Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acad Emerg Med ; 25(3): 301-309, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29150972

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Quality of care delivered to adult patients in the emergency department (ED) is often associated with demographic and clinical factors such as a patient's race/ethnicity and insurance status. We sought to determine whether the quality of care delivered to children in the ED was associated with a variety of patient-level factors. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study. Pediatric patients (<18 years) who received care between January 2011 and December 2011 at one of 12 EDs participating in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) were included. We analyzed demographic factors (including age, sex, and payment source) and clinical factors (including triage, chief complaint, and severity of illness). We measured quality of care using a previously validated implicit review instrument using chart review with a summary score that ranged from 5 to 35. We examined associations between demographic and clinical factors and quality of care using a hierarchical multivariable linear regression model with hospital site as a random effect. RESULTS: In the multivariable model, among the 620 ED encounters reviewed, we did not find any association between patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, and payment source and the quality of care delivered. However, we did find that some chief complaint categories were significantly associated with lower than average quality of care, including fever (-0.65 points in quality, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.24 to -0.06) and upper respiratory symptoms (-0.68 points in quality, 95% CI = -1.30 to -0.07). CONCLUSION: We found that quality of ED care delivered to children among a cohort of 12 EDs participating in the PECARN was high and did not differ by patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, and payment source, but did vary by the presenting chief complaint.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
2.
Health Serv Res ; 53(3): 1316-1334, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29143331

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the consistency, reliability, and validity of an implicit review instrument that measures the quality of care provided to children in the emergency department (ED). DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Medical records of randomly selected children from 12 EDs in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). STUDY DESIGN: Eight pediatric emergency medicine physicians applied the instrument to 620 medical records. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We determined internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha and inter-rater reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). We evaluated the validity of the instrument by correlating scores with four condition-specific explicit review instruments. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Individual reviewers' Cronbach's alpha had a mean of 0.85 with a range of 0.76-0.97; overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.90. The ICC was 0.49 for the summary score with a range from 0.40 to 0.46. Correlations between the quality of care score and the four condition-specific explicit review scores ranged from 0.24 to 0.38. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of care instrument demonstrated good internal consistency, moderate inter-rater reliability, high inter-rater agreement, and evidence supporting validity. The instrument could be useful for systems' assessment and research in evaluating the care delivered to children in the ED.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Pediatria/organização & administração , Doença Aguda/terapia , Adolescente , Criança , Saúde da Criança , Pré-Escolar , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pediatria/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia
3.
Value Health ; 20(4): 542-546, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28407995

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate travel-related and environmental savings resulting from the use of telemedicine for outpatient specialty consultations with a university telemedicine program. METHODS: The study was designed to retrospectively analyze the telemedicine consultation database at the University of California Davis Health System (UCDHS) between July 1996 and December 2013. Travel distances and travel times were calculated between the patient home, the telemedicine clinic, and the UCDHS in-person clinic. Travel cost savings and environmental impact were calculated by determining differences in mileage reimbursement rate and emissions between those incurred in attending telemedicine appointments and those that would have been incurred if a visit to the hub site had been necessary. RESULTS: There were 19,246 consultations identified among 11,281 unique patients. Telemedicine visits resulted in a total travel distance savings of 5,345,602 miles, a total travel time savings of 4,708,891 minutes or 8.96 years, and a total direct travel cost savings of $2,882,056. The mean per-consultation round-trip distance savings were 278 miles, average travel time savings were 245 minutes, and average cost savings were $156. Telemedicine consultations resulted in a total emissions savings of 1969 metric tons of CO2, 50 metric tons of CO, 3.7 metric tons of NOx, and 5.5 metric tons of volatile organic compounds. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the positive impact of a health system's outpatient telemedicine program on patient travel time, patient travel costs, and environmental pollutants.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Eficiência , Poluentes Ambientais/efeitos adversos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitais Universitários , Consulta Remota/métodos , Meios de Transporte/economia , Emissões de Veículos/prevenção & controle , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , California , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Monitoramento Ambiental , Humanos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Consulta Remota/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Estudos de Tempo e Movimento
4.
Med Decis Making ; 35(6): 773-83, 2015 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25952744

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive economic evaluations have not been conducted on telemedicine consultations to children in rural emergency departments (EDs). OBJECTIVE: We conducted an economic evaluation to estimate the cost, effectiveness, and return on investment (ROI) of telemedicine consultations provided to health care providers of acutely ill and injured children in rural EDs compared with telephone consultations from a health care payer prospective. METHODS: We built a decision model with parameters from primary programmatic data, national data, and the literature. We performed a base-case cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), a probabilistic CEA with Monte Carlo simulation, and ROI estimation when CEA suggested cost-saving. The CEA was based on program effectiveness, derived from transfer decisions following telemedicine and telephone consultations. RESULTS: The average cost for a telemedicine consultation was $3641 per child/ED/year in 2013 US dollars. Telemedicine consultations resulted in 31% fewer patient transfers compared with telephone consultations and a cost reduction of $4662 per child/ED/year. Our probabilistic CEA demonstrated telemedicine consultations were less costly than telephone consultations in 57% of simulation iterations. The ROI was calculated to be 1.28 ($4662/$3641) from the base-case analysis and estimated to be 1.96 from the probabilistic analysis, suggesting a $1.96 return for each dollar invested in telemedicine. Treating 10 acutely ill and injured children at each rural ED with telemedicine resulted in an annual cost-savings of $46,620 per ED. LIMITATIONS: Telephone and telemedicine consultations were not randomly assigned, potentially resulting in biased results. CONCLUSIONS: From a health care payer perspective, telemedicine consultations to health care providers of acutely ill and injured children presenting to rural EDs are cost-saving (base-case and more than half of Monte Carlo simulation iterations) or cost-effective compared with telephone consultations.


Assuntos
Doença Aguda/economia , Doença Aguda/terapia , Análise Custo-Benefício/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Pediatria/economia , Consulta Remota/economia , Serviços de Saúde Rural/economia , Ferimentos e Lesões/economia , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Criança , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Método de Monte Carlo , Telefone/economia
5.
Telemed J E Health ; 19(7): 502-8, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23837516

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluates the financial impact of telemedicine outreach in a competitive healthcare market from a tertiary children's hospital's perspective. We compared the number of transfers, average hospital revenue, and average professional billing revenue before and after the deployment of telemedicine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of hospital and physician billing records for patients transferred from 16 hospitals where telemedicine services were implemented between July 2003 and December 2010. Hospital revenue was defined as total revenue minus operating costs. Professional billing revenue was defined as total payment received as the result of physician billing of patients' insurance. We compared the number of transfers, average net hospital revenue per year, and average professional billing revenue per year before and after the deployment of telemedicine at these hospitals. RESULTS: There were 2,029 children transferred to the children's hospital from the 16 hospitals with telemedicine during the study period. The average number of patients transferred per year to the children's hospital increased from 143 pre-telemedicine to 285 post-telemedicine. From these patients, the average hospital revenue increased from $2.4 million to $4.0 million per year, and the average professional billing revenue increased from $313,977 to $688,443 per year. On average, per hospital, following the deployment of telemedicine, hospital revenue increased by $101,744 per year, and professional billing revenue increased by $23,404 per year. CONCLUSIONS: In a competitive healthcare region with more than one children's hospital, deploying pediatric telemedicine services to referring hospitals resulted in an increased market share and an increased number of transfers, hospital revenue, and professional billing revenue.


Assuntos
Hospitais Pediátricos/economia , Transferência de Pacientes/economia , Telemedicina/economia , California , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Eficiência Organizacional/economia , Auditoria Financeira , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estudos de Casos Organizacionais , Transferência de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA