Assessment of Pretreatment and Posttreatment Evolution of Neurofilament Light Chain Levels in Patients Who Develop Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome.

Importance: Determining whether neurofilament light chain (NfL) elevations in patients who develop immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occur before or after infusion of cellular product is important to identify high-risk patients and inform whether neuroaxonal injury is latent or a consequence of treatment. Objective: To quantify serial NfL levels in patients undergoing cellular therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective 2-center study examined plasma NfL levels in 30 patients with detailed medical and treatment history, including all major pretreatment and posttreatment risk factors. Exclusion criteria included dementia and severe, symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) involvement. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients' NfL levels were measured at 7 time points: baseline (prelymphodepletion), during lymphodepletion, postinfusion day (D) 1, D3, D7, D14, and D30. Prediction accuracy for the development of ICANS was next modeled using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) classification. Finally, univariate and multivariate modeling examined the association between NfL levels, ICANS, and potential risk factors including demographic (age, sex), oncologic (tumor burden, history of CNS involvement), neurologic (history of nononcologic CNS disease or neuropathy), and neurotoxic exposure histories (vincristine, cytarabine, methotrexate, or CNS radiotherapy). Results: A total of 30 patients (median [range] age, 64 [22-80] years; 12 women [40%] and 18 men [60%]) were included. Individuals who developed ICANS had elevations in NfL prior to lymphodepletion and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell infusion compared with those who did not develop ICANS (no ICANS: 29.4 pg/mL, vs any ICANS: 87.6 pg/mL; P < .001). Baseline NfL levels further predicted ICANS development with high accuracy (area under the ROC curve, 0.96), sensitivity (0.91), and specificity (0.95). Levels of NfL remained elevated across all time points, up to 30 days postinfusion. Baseline NfL levels correlated with ICANS severity but not demographic factors, oncologic history, nononcologic neurologic history, or history of exposure to neurotoxic therapies. Conclusions and Relevance: In a subset of patients in this cross-sectional study, the risk of developing ICANS was associated with preexisting neuroaxonal injury that was quantifiable with plasma NfL level. This latent neuroaxonal injury was present prior to drug administration but was not associated with historic neurotoxic therapies or nononcologic neurologic disease. Preinfusion NfL may further permit early screening and identification of patients most at risk for ICANS. Additional studies are needed to determine NfL's utility as a predictive biomarker for early (preemptive or prophylactic) intervention and to delineate the origin of this underlying neural injury.

Role of reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in older patients with de novo myelodysplastic syndromes: an international collaborative decision analysis.

PURPOSE: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal hematopoietic disorders that are more common in patients aged ≥ 60 years and are incurable with conventional therapies. Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is potentially curative but has additional mortality risk. We evaluated RIC transplantation versus nontransplantation therapies in older patients with MDS stratified by International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A Markov decision model with quality-of-life utility estimates for different MDS and transplantation states was assessed. Outcomes were life expectancy (LE) and quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE). A total of 514 patients with de novo MDS aged 60 to 70 years were evaluated. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, isolated 5q- syndrome, unclassifiable, and therapy-related MDS were excluded. Transplantation using T-cell depletion or HLA-mismatched or umbilical cord donors was also excluded. RIC transplantation (n = 132) stratified by IPSS risk was compared with best supportive care for patients with nonanemic low/intermediate-1 IPSS (n = 123), hematopoietic growth factors for patients with anemic low/intermediate-1 IPSS (n = 94), and hypomethylating agents for patients with intermediate-2/high IPSS (n = 165). RESULTS: For patients with low/intermediate-1 IPSS MDS, RIC transplantation LE was 38 months versus 77 months with nontransplantation approaches. QALE and sensitivity analysis did not favor RIC transplantation across plausible utility estimates. For intermediate-2/high IPSS MDS, RIC transplantation LE was 36 months versus 28 months for nontransplantation therapies. QALE and sensitivity analysis favored RIC transplantation across plausible utility estimates. CONCLUSION: For patients with de novo MDS aged 60 to 70 years, favored treatments vary with IPSS risk. For low/intermediate-1 IPSS, nontransplantation approaches are preferred. For intermediate-2/high IPSS, RIC transplantation offers overall and quality-adjusted survival benefit.

Economic evaluation of plerixafor for stem cell mobilization.

INTRODUCTION: Autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation (ASCT) with high-dose chemotherapy is a preferred treatment for relapsed non- Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients. Estimated failure rates with current stem cell mobilization (SCM) regimens are 5% to 30%. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with plerixafor (G P) is superior to G-CSF alone for SCM in heavily pretreated NHL patients. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a cost-utility evaluation of G P versus G-CSF as a method for SCM in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common subtype of NHL. METHODS: A Markov model simulated the care process of DLBCL patients undergoing ASCT using data from the Washington University site of the plerixafor phase III study. Other data and utilities were taken from the literature. Costs were Medicare allowable. Using microsimulation we estimated the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) over the patient's remaining lifetime. RESULTS: The expected lifetime cost of providing care for DLBCL patients using G P was $25,567 more than G-CSF, but they accumulated 1.74 more quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for an ICUR of $14,735 per QALY. In sensitivity analyses this result was robust to clinically relevant changes in assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: Using G P for SCM in ASCT of patients with DLBCL meets accepted standards of cost-effectiveness, primarily because of its effectiveness in SCM.