Pharmacy hydroxyurea education materials for patients with sickle cell disease: An environmental scan and assessment of accuracy.

BACKGROUND: Hydroxyurea (HU) remains a cornerstone of sickle cell disease (SCD) therapy; however, its use is limited by poor patient adherence owing to concerns about side effects. Pharmacies routinely provide patients with handouts about HU, which, we hypothesized, contain inaccuracies that may contribute to negative patient perceptions of HU. METHODS: We used a systematic approach to collect and review patient information handouts (PIHs) on HU from pharmacies in Ontario, Canada. PIHs were evaluated according to: i. Number of inaccurate statements, ii. Percentage of essential statements based on comparison with a reference standard PIH developed by the Canadian Haemoglobinopathy Association (CanHaem), and iii. Reading level. RESULTS: PIHs were collected from 98% of chain and community pharmacies registered in Ontario. All PIHs contained inaccurate statements, most frequently relating to the risk of developing cancer. Only 33% of PIHs identified SCD as an indication for HU use. Pharmacy PIHs contained 45% of the essential statements present within the CanHaem HU PIH, neglecting to mention use of HU for management of SCD and benefits of HU in preventing SCD complications. Moreover, the reading level across pharmacy PIHs was 1.8 grades higher than that advised for written patient education materials. CONCLUSION: Patients who are prescribed HU are likely to be provided with PIHs that contain inaccuracies that are weighted toward the risks of HU therapy and run contrary to published literature. This study identifies a gap in the care of patients with SCD and an opportunity to improve the quality of HU PIHs to help patients make well-informed decisions about their health.

Reducing the hospital burden of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: impact of an avoid-heparin program.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse drug reaction occurring in up to 5% of patients exposed to unfractionated heparin (UFH). We examined the impact of a hospital-wide strategy for avoiding heparin on the incidence of HIT, HIT with thrombosis (HITT), and HIT-related costs. The Avoid-Heparin Initiative, implemented at a tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, since 2006, involved replacing UFH with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Consecutive cases with suspected HIT from 2003 through 2012 were reviewed. Rates of suspected HIT, adjudicated HIT, and HITT, along with HIT-related expenditures were compared in the pre-intervention (2003-2005) and the avoid-heparin (2007-2012) phases. The annual rate of suspected HIT decreased 42%, from 85.5 per 10 000 admissions in the pre-intervention phase to 49.0 per 10 000 admissions in the avoid-heparin phase ( ITALIC! P< .001). The annual rate of patients with a positive HIT assay decreased 63% from 16.5 to 6.1 per 10 000 admissions ( ITALIC! P< .001), adjudicated HIT decreased 79% from 10.7 to 2.2 per 10 000 admissions ( ITALIC! P< .001), and HITT decreased 91% from 4.6 to 0.4 per 10 000 admissions ( ITALIC! P< .001). Hospital HIT-related expenditures decreased by $266 938 per year in the avoid-heparin phase. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating the success and feasibility of a hospital-wide HIT prevention strategy.