Prevalence and Determinants of Fatigue in Patients with IBD: A Cross-Sectional Survey from the GETAID.

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is commonly reported by patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], but the determinants of IBD-related fatigue have yet to be determined. AIMS: To identify the factors associated with fatigue in a large population of patients with IBD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fatigue and nine other IBD-related disability dimensions were assessed in a cohort of 1704 consecutive patients with IBD using the IBD-disk questionnaire in a cross-sectional survey of 42 French and Belgian centres. Fatigue and severe fatigue were defined as energy subscores >5 and >7, respectively. Determinants of fatigue were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses (odds ratios [ORs] are provided with 95% confidence intervals). RESULTS: The prevalence rates of fatigue and severe fatigue were 54.1% and 37.1%, respectively. Both fatigue and severe fatigue were significantly higher in patients with active disease than in patients with inactive disease [64.9% vs 44.7% and 47.4% vs 28.6%, respectively; p < 0.001 for both comparisons]. In the multivariate analysis stratified by age, sex, type of IBD and IBD activity, fatigue was associated with age >40 years (OR = 0.71 [0.54-0.93]), female sex (OR = 1.48 [1.13-1.93]) and IBD-related sick leave (OR = 1.61 [1.19-2.16]), and joint pain (OR = 1.60 [1.17-2.18]), abdominal pain (OR = 1.78 [1.29-2.45]), regulating defecation (OR = 1.67 [1.20-2.32]), education and work (OR = 1.96 [1.40-2.75]), body image (OR = 1.38 [1.02-1.86]), sleep (OR = 3.60 [2.66-4.88]) and emotions (OR = 3.60 [2.66-4.88]) subscores >5. CONCLUSION: Determinants of fatigue are not restricted to IBD-related factors but also include social factors, sleep and emotional disturbances, thus supporting a holistic approach to IBD patient care.

VALIDation of the IBD-Disk Instrument for Assessing Disability in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in a French Cohort: The VALIDate Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD] are disabling disorders. The IBD-Disability Index [IBD-DI] was developed for quantifying disability in IBD patients but is difficult to use. The IBD-Disk is a visual adaptation of the IBD-DI. It has not been validated yet. The main objectives were to validate the IBD-Disk and to assess the clinical factors associated with a change in the score and its variability over time. METHODS: From May 2018 to July 2019, IBD patients from three university-affiliated hospitals responded twice to both IBD-Disk and IBD-DI at 3-12 month intervals. Validation included concurrent validity, reproducibility, and internal consistency. Mean IBD-Disk scores were compared according to clinical factors. Variability was assessed by comparing scores between baseline and follow-up visits. RESULTS: A total of 447 patients [71% Crohn's disease, 28% ulcerative colitis] were included in the analysis at baseline and 265 at follow-up. There was a good correlation between IBD-Disk and IBD-DI [r = 0.75, p <0.001]. Reproducibility was excellent [intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.90], as well as internal consistency [Cronbach's α = 0.89]. The IBD-Disk was not influenced by IBD type but was associated with female gender and physician global assessment. Extra-intestinal manifestations, history of resection, elevated C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin also tended to be associated with higher disability. The IBD-Disk score decreased in patients becoming inactive over time. CONCLUSIONS: This study validated the IBD-Disk in a large cohort of IBD patients, demonstrating that it is a valid and reliable tool for quantifying disability for both CD and UC.

Assessment of new hyaluronic acid assays and their impact on FibroMeter scores.

BACKGROUND: We compared three hyaluronic acid (HA) assays and analyzed the impact of their variations on FibroMeter scores. METHODS: In a test group of 165 patients, HA levels were assessed with the commonly used ELISA assay from Corgenix, a new ELISA assay from Teco and an immunoturbidimetry assay from Wako, this latter tested across three different instruments. Five different FibroMeter scores were calculated. RESULTS: Correlation across the three assays (r(s) between 0.969 and 0.995) was very good. Means of differences (d) were lower when the immunoturbidimetry assay was compared on different instruments: d between -3.4 and 2.0 µg/L. However, a higher value for HA measurement was observed with Corgenix assay, compared to the other two assays (Teco and Wako): d between 27.1 and 36.4 µg/L. The assessment also demonstrated that HA variations had very little impact on FibroMeter scores: 0.0117 for virus and 0.0416 for alcoholic fibrosis scores, and between 0.58 and 1.71 for the area of fibrosis (expressed in percentage). CONCLUSIONS: The two new assays found lower values of HA, as compared to the Corgenix assay. However, these differences had very little impact on FibroMeter scores and had no impact on clinical evaluation of liver fibrosis.