Point-of-care COVID-19 antigen testing in German emergency rooms - a cost-benefit analysis.

BACKGROUND: The current COVID-19 pandemic is causing significant morbidity and death worldwide and produces significant socio-economic losses. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-benefit relation of implementing point-of-care COVID-19 antigen testing (POCT) in emergency rooms (ER) of German hospitals. METHODS: A deterministic decision-analytic model simulated the incremental costs of using the Sofia® SARS Antigen FIA test compared to those of using clinical judgement alone to confirm or exclude COVID-19 in adult patients in German ER, prior to hospitalization. Direct and indirect costs, with and without subsequent RT-PCR confirmation, were evaluated from the hospital perspective. RESULTS: With respect to ER patients, in base-case analysis, considering a COVID-19 prevalence of 15.6% and a hospitalization rate among COVID-19 suspects of 10.1%, POCT testing reduces average costs of hospitalized patients by €213 per tested patient if nasopharyngeal swabs of patients suspected to have COVID-19 are also sent to external labs for RT-PCR testing. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, under all reasonable assumptions, implementing the Sofia® SARS Antigen FIA saves on average about €210 as compared to applying the clinical-judgement-only strategy. The major part of cost savings, €159 or 75.9%, is due to the POC test´s high specificity resulting in a 21-fold lower proportion of unnecessary bed blocking at the first day of hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Using highly specific rapid COVID-19 tests in COVID-19 suspects at German ER, despite of their sub-optimal sensitivity, may significantly reduce hospital expenditure.

Cost of multidrug resistant tuberculosis in Germany-An update.

BACKGROUND: In 2019, new therapeutic recommendations for multidrug-resistant (MDR-) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis (TB) were published by the WHO, advocating the use of oral drugs and stepwise composition of antibiotic regimens. To date, the economic consequences of those recommendations in low incidence settings have not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the costs of applying the new recommendations against a set of 86 MDR-TB/XDR-TB strains, each with individual phenotypic drug resistance patterns, identified in 2018/2019 by the German National Reference Center for Mycobacteria. METHODS: Hospitalization costs as covered by German statutory health insurance and the loss of productivity due to illness were calculated using the most recent 2018 statistical data. Costs due to combining five agents in the intensive phase and costs of outpatient monitoring were determined by Monte-Carlo simulation covering all treatment options over an 18-month period. Drug costs were compared to those arising under the approach recommended by the WHO in 2016. RESULTS: Hospitalization costs per MDR-TB patient were €30,152 and the mean costs of antimicrobials over a period of 18 months were €66,854 (range €20,671 to €187,444). Total treatment costs, including outpatient monitoring, were €73,551.56 per patient (range €30,114 to €145.878). In addition, we determined an average cost of €11,410.20 due to productivity loss over a period of 6 months sick leave. Despite a shortened minimum recommended treatment duration (18 versus 20 months), the estimated costs were 24.5% higher based on the 2019 recommendations as compared to the 2016 guideline version. CONCLUSION: Higher costs for treating MDR-TB/XDR-TB in Germany are to be expected under the new WHO regimens. However, it must be determined whether treatment duration and costs associated with sick leave may be further reduced in the future through shorter hospital stays and earlier culture conversion.

The cost of Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease in Canada, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom: a nationally representative observational study.

BACKGROUND: Management of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease (NTMLD) consists of a long-term multi-drug antibiotic regimen, yet many patients do not achieve culture conversion. We estimated the NTMLD-related direct medical costs in Canada, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom (UK) among refractory patients who were infected with Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), without concomitant cystic fibrosis, tuberculosis, or HIV. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational physician survey of nationally representative samples. The survey captured anonymized information about patients' treatment histories for NTMLD-related health care resource utilization over a 24-month period. We summarized NTMLD-related resource use and estimated the total economic burden, from each country's health care payer perspective. RESULTS: In total, 59 physicians provided data on 157 patients. The average person time observed during the 24-month period was 1.7 years (SD: 0.4); 17% of patients died by the end of the study period. The major components of NTMLD-related direct medical costs among refractory patients were hospitalizations (varying from 29% of total annual costs in the UK to 69% in France), outpatient visits (8% in Canada to 51% in the UK), and outpatient testing such as post-diagnostic sputum testing, bronchial wash/lavage, spirometry, biopsies, imaging, and electrocardiograms (5% in France to 35% in Canada). In this patient cohort, the average direct medical costs per person-year, in local currencies, were approximately $16,200 (Canada), €11,600 (Germany), €17,900 (France) and £9,700 (UK). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study's findings, we conclude that managing patients with refractory NTMLD caused by MAC is associated with a substantial economic burden.

Cost of multi drug resistance tuberculosis in Germany.

OBJECTIVES: 4220 new cases of tuberculosis (TB) were reported in Germany in 2012; of those, 65 cases were multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) or extensively multidrug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) cases. However, there is only limited information on the economic consequences of drug resistance patterns on the treatment costs of MDR-and XDR-TB patients. METHODS: On the basis of drug susceptibility of the single MDR-TB/XDR-TB strains the direct medical costs of suitable therapies were calculated according to the current guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO) and those of the German Central Committee against Tuberculosis. These costs were combined with hospital and outpatients monitoring costs and followed the most recent German invoicing system and health statistics. Total drug and monitoring costs and were determined by Monte-Carlo simulation comprising all different options. RESULTS: According to this, the mean drug costs were €51,113.22 (range €19,586.14 to €94,767.90). The weighted costs for hospitalization were €26,000.76 per patient compared to only €2,192.13 for primary outpatients; the total treatment costs of MDR-TB amounted to €64,429.23. These are joined by the costs due to loss of productivity, varying between €17,721.60 and €44,304. From a societal perspective, the total cost per MDR-TB/XDR-TB case reach an amount between €82,150 and €108,733 per case, respectively. CONCLUSION: Cost analyses based on strain resistance patterns allow more reliable estimates of the real costs of treating MDR-TB/XDR-TB than do methods that ignore this factor. Advantageously, they demonstrate the economic impact of drug-resistant TB in low-incidence countries. Costs of productivity loss is of new importance because of the length of MDR-XDR therapy, but its true share of total costs has still to be determined.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of interventions for tuberculosis control: DALYs versus QALYs.

The emergence of multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in the European region and the high costs (nearly 536 million) generated by the nearly 72,000 notified TB cases in the EU are the factors driving the need for development and implementation of new tools against TB. In this context, cost-effectiveness analyses applying quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) or disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) as outcome measures for economic evaluation of improved approaches to TB control are increasingly important. While the methodology applied to derive the effectiveness data is commonly reported, less information is given regarding the derivation of utility weights in the calculation of QALYs for TB treatment. To date, despite the particular complexities of the disease, TB health effects have not been fully measured and there is no agreement on how disutility of TB disease should be accounted for. Consequently, disutility values in published studies vary considerably, and often appear to lack empirical evidence. As the need for a solid heath-economics rationale for investment in new tools against TB grows, adequate and comprehensive methods for assessing the impairments caused by different types of TB must be developed. Focusing on the assessment of DALYs as a measure of outcome in economic evaluation, we have built an exemplary model calculation applying the original TB data for Germany as reported to the Robert Koch Institute. Our work demonstrates that the use of standard equations provided in the scientific literature probably results in an underestimation of lost DALYs compared with probabilistic techniques. Providing distributions around epidemiological averages, coupled with Monte Carlo simulation to address uncertainty, may result in more realistic values. In line with a previous recommendation by the World Health Organization, it appears worthwhile to consider this more intricate approach to providing healthcare resource allocation decisions, particularly for TB.

[Costs of the influenza pandemic for the public health services - calculations based on the model of the metropolitan region Frankfurt am Main]. / Inkrementelle Kosten der A/H1N1-Pandemie für den Öffentlichen Gesundheitsdienst - Berechnungen am Beispiel der Metropole Frankfurt am Main.

The influenza pandemic of 2009 has been the biggest challenge to the public health services in post-war Germany. This study investigates the impact on the overall costs for the public health authorities of the metropolitan region Frankfurt am Main which arose in the context of the pandemic as well as the specific costs of the implementation and realisation of the vaccination campaign during the pandemic. In 2009 the incremental costs for the Health Protection Authority of the City of Frankfurt am Main for the prevention and logistics caused by this pandemic amounted to € 223,537.91, whereas costs which could be directly attributed to the vaccination campaign (vaccine not included amounted to only a fraction thereof (€â€Š45,401.48). The per-capita costs for vaccinated citizens were €â€Š10.66.  These results clearly demonstrate the importance of adequate financial resources for the public health authorities to cope with infectious disease outbreaks and future pandemics.

Enhanced cost-benefit analysis of strategies for LTBI screening and INH chemoprevention in Germany.

OBJECTIVES: There is only limited economic data in head-to head comparison between a whole blood QuantiFERON TB Gold in tube (QFT) and the tuberculin skin test (TST) when screening and treating for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), and no published study to date that takes into account the predictive value of the two tests. METHODS: Health and economic outcomes of isoniazid preventive treatment (IPT) of close contacts were compared in a decision tree model to perform a cost-benefit analysis with respect to isoniazid related hepatotoxicity and early post-exposure TB over a 2-y period, using the QFT or TST alone or QFT as a confirmatory test for TST results. RESULTS: Cost of screening and treating for using the QFT alone amounted to euro215.79 per close contact, less than that of dual step-testing (euro227.89) or using TST alone (euro232.58). Savings amounted to euro12,200 or euro16,791 per 1000 close contacts, respectively. QFT based procedures were most sensitive to low compliance with IPT or increasing price. Costs of dual step screening was mostly influenced by cost of treating TB disease. When the progression rate for QFT was lowered to that for the TST in a sensitivity analysis, the relationship between the strategies remained robust. In addition, costs of the QFT strategy decreased to euro165.1, and those of the dual step strategy to euro218.4. CONCLUSION: IPT on the basis of using the QFT assay alone produces less cost and reduces more TB cases than other strategies in a low-incidence setting. These data have implications for the rational implementation of screening strategies in contact investigation.

Cost-effectiveness of interferon-gamma release assay testing for the treatment of latent tuberculosis.

The aim of the present study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of the new T-SPOT.TB assay versus the tuberculin skin test (TST) for screening contacts for latent tuberculosis (TB) infection in Switzerland. Health and economic outcomes of isoniazid treatment of 20- and 40-yr-old close contacts were compared in a Markov model over a 20-yr period following screening with TST only (at three cut-off values) and T-SPOT.TB alone or in combination with the TST. T-SPOT.TB-based treatment was cost-effective at (Euro)11,621 and (Euro)23,692 per life-year-gained (LYG) in the younger and older age group, respectively. No TST-based programmes were cost-effective, except at a 15-mm cut-off in the younger group only, where the cost-effectiveness ((Euro)26,451.LYG(-1)) fell just below the willingness-to-pay threshold. Combination of the TST with T-SPOT.TB slightly reduced the total cost compared with the T-SPOT.TB alone by 4.4 and 5.0% in the younger and older groups respectively. The number of contacts treated to avoid one case of TB decreased from 50 (95% confidence interval 32-106) with the TST (10-mm cut-off) to 18 (95%CI 11-43) if T-SPOT.TB was used. Using T-SPOT.TB alone or in combination with the tuberculin skin test for screening of close contacts before latent tuberculosis infection treatment is highly cost-effective in reducing the disease burden of tuberculosis.

Cost-optimisation of screening for latent tuberculosis in close contacts.

The aim of the present study was to perform cost-minimisation analysis of contact investigation from a public health perspective using the tuberculin skin test (TST) and a new blood assay, QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-G). A decision-analysis model simulated the costs of investigating a cohort of adult close tuberculosis contacts by the public health service following the current German guidelines over a period of 2 yrs. The economic outcomes were compared with alternative screening strategies. These were: 1) QFT-G instead of TST; 2) TST followed by QFT-G; and 3) TST followed by QFT-G in vaccinated (bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG)) subjects. In a base-case analysis, the costs of TST-based screening were 91.06 Euros (EUR).contact(-1), assuming a 1% tuberculosis-case-finding incidence. The least expensive strategy was TST screening plus subsequent QFT-G testing (52.05 EUR), resulting in a 43% cost reduction. Using QFT-G alone in BCG-vaccinated subjects who tested positive in the TST led to a 39% cost reduction. The savings using QFT-G alone instead of TST amounted to 29.77 EUR.contact(-1). The results depended on the acquisition costs assumed and the proportion of positive results in TST-based screening. Screening for tuberculosis by combining tuberculin skin testing and QuantiFERON-TB Gold markedly reduces public health costs compared with tuberculin skin test screening alone.

[Contribution of the Public Health Service to cost of illness studies]. / Der Beitrag des öffentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes zur Krankheitskostenrechnung in Deutschland.

This paper reflects on the different approach-es of top-down and bottom-up analysis when calculating sickness costs. Following an analysis of the standard procedures to be followed in tuberculosis contact tracing performed by public health bureaux in Hamburg, a top-down estimate is presented de-spite some accounting limitations. The val-ue of epidemiologic data on infectious dis-eases held by the Public Health Service for bottom-up-modelling is shown by a cost-of-illness study on hepatitis A in Germany.However, broader efforts may be required by local service providers to justify their existence from an economic perspective. This could also contribute to improving cooperation between public health authorities and schools of public health in this rapidly developing scientific field.

Cost-effectiveness of isoniazid chemoprevention in close contacts.

The aim of the present study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis in young and middle-aged adults with latent tuberculosis (TB) infection in Germany. A Markov model simulated the progression of 20- and 40-yr-old close contacts of active TB cases over 20 yrs. Health and economic outcomes of isoniazid (INH) chemoprevention versus no intervention were compared. The analysis determined the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life year and the difference between numbers of TB cases and of TB-related deaths. INH chemoprevention prevented 79% of expected TB cases in both age groups, and saved 9,482 and 9,142 in the lower and higher age groups, respectively, per case prevented. Quality-adjusted life expectancy was slightly extended by 8 days in the lower age group and 7 days in the higher age group, at a cost saving of 417 and 375, respectively, per person. Annual savings were 20,862 and 18,742 per 1,000 contacts, respectively. The number needed to be treated to prevent one TB case in the lower age group was 23 and 25 in the higher age group. The programme also prevented three TB-related deaths in the younger and two in the older cohort. The results are highly sensitive to treatment-cost assumptions. In conclusion, isoniazid chemoprevention in Germany is a highly cost-effective approach for reducing the burden of tuberculosis in recently converted young and middle-aged adults.

[Disability payments in diabetes mellitus in social security: what is necessary?]. / Krankenkostzulage bei Diabetes mellitus im Sozialhilferecht: Was ist erforderlich?

Since their publication in 1974 the recommendations of the "German Society for Public and Private Welfare" are regarded as competent guideline for the allocation of grants concerning the diet for diabetic subjects according to section 23 part 4, position 2 BSHG (Federal German Law for Social Security). The former nutrition concepts are compared to the current international conceptions regarding the diet of diabetic individuals. Possible variations concerning food plans are shown in model plans considering realistic habits of consumption. Our analysis justifies additional expenses limited to about 20 to 30% for insulin-dependent diabetic subjects compared to an isocaloric regular diet. Additional expenses for obese non-insulin-dependent diabetic subjects are not necessary. There is an extremely slim portion allocated for food within the social security benefit according to section 22 BSHG. That will require an comprehensive supply of education for the realisation of the current recommendations for nutrition. The education programmes for compiling suitable food plans to remain within the scheduled cost limits need to be organized by regional carriers of social welfare, whereby public Health offices could make an important contribution.