Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Healthc (Amst) ; 8(1): 100364, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31155480

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Older adults with cardiometabolic conditions are typically seen by multiple providers. Management by multiple providers may compromise care continuity and increase health expenditures for older adults, which may partly explain the inverse association between continuity and Medicare expenditures found in prior studies. This study sought to examine whether all-cause admission, outpatient expenditures or total expenditures were associated with the number of prescribers of cardiometabolic medications. METHODS: Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with diabetes (n = 100,191), hypertension (n = 299,949) or dyslipidemia (n = 243,598) living in 10 states were identified from claims data. The probability of an all-cause hospital admission in 2011 was estimated via logistic regression and Medicare (outpatient, total) expenditures in 2011 were estimated using generalized linear models, both as a function of the number of prescribers in 2010. Regressions were adjusted for demographic characteristics, Medicaid status, number of prescriptions, and 17 chronic conditions. RESULTS: In all three cohorts, older adults with more prescribers in 2010 had modestly higher adjusted odds of all-cause inpatient admission than older adults with a single prescriber. Compared to a single prescriber, outpatient and total expenditures in 2011 were 3-10% higher for older adults with diabetes and multiple prescribers, 2-6% higher for older adults with hypertension and multiple prescribers, and 2-5% higher for older adults with dyslipidemia and multiple prescribers. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These results provide some evidence that older adults with multiple prescribers also have modestly higher Medicare utilization than those with a single prescriber; thus care continuity may impact patient utilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (retrospective cohort analysis).


Assuntos
Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/normas , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Dislipidemias/economia , Dislipidemias/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/economia , Hipertensão/terapia , Masculino , Medicare/economia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
2.
Med Care ; 55(4): 405-410, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27755393

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Medicare beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions are typically seen by multiple providers, particularly specialists. Clinically appropriate referrals to multiple specialists may compromise the continuity of care for multiple chronic condition beneficiaries and create care plans that patients may find challenging to reconcile, which may impact patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to examine whether glycemic control or lipid control was associated with the number of prescribers of cardiometabolic medications. RESEARCH DESIGN, SUBJECTS, AND MEASURES: A retrospective cross-sectional cohort analysis of 51,879 elderly Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with diabetes and 129,762 beneficiaries with dyslipidemia living in 10 east coast states. Glycemic control was defined as having an HbA1c<7.5. Lipid control was defined as an low-density lipoprotein<100 for beneficiaries with heart disease or diabetes or an low-density lipoprotein<130 for all other beneficiaries. We examined the association between the number of prescribers of cardiometabolic medications and disease or lipid control in 2011 through logistic regression, controlling for age, sex, race, Medicaid enrollment, 17 chronic conditions and state-fixed effects. RESULTS: Among beneficiaries with diabetes, 76% with one prescriber had well-controlled diabetes in 2011, which decreased to 65% for beneficiaries with 5+ prescribers. In adjusted analyses, Medicare beneficiaries with 3 or more prescribers were less likely to have glycemic control than beneficiaries with a single prescriber. Among those with dyslipidemia, nearly all (91%-92%) beneficiaries had lipid control. After adjustment for demographics and comorbidity burden, beneficiaries with 3 prescribers were less likely to have lipid control than beneficiaries with a single prescriber. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple prescribers were associated with worse disease control, possibly because patients with more severe diabetes or dyslipidemia have multiple prescribers or because care fragmentation is associated with worse disease control.


Assuntos
Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Dislipidemias/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapêutico , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Gerenciamento Clínico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Polimedicação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Veteranos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA