Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surgery ; 175(2): 457-462, 2024 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38016898

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The effect of social health determinants on hernia surgery receipt is unclear. We aimed to assess the association of the social vulnerability index with the likelihood of undergoing elective and emergency hernia repair in Texas. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of the Texas Hospital Inpatient Discharge Public Use Data File and Texas Outpatient Surgical and Radiological Procedure Public Use Data File from 2016 to 2019. Patients ≥18 years old with inguinal or umbilical hernia were included. Social vulnerability index and urban/rural status were merged with the database at the county level. Patients were stratified based on social vulnerability index quartiles, with the lowest quartile (Q1) designated as low vulnerability, Q2 and Q3 as average, and Q4 as high vulnerability. Wilcoxon rank sum, t test, and χ2 analysis were used, as appropriate. The relative risk of undergoing surgery was calculated with subgroup sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Of 234,843 patients assessed, 148,139 (63.1%) underwent surgery. Compared to patients with an average social vulnerability index, the low social vulnerability index group was 36% more likely to receive surgery (relative risk: 1.36, 95% CI 1.34-1.37), whereas the high social vulnerability index group was 14% less likely to receive surgery (relative risk: 0.86, 95% CI 0.85-0.86). This remained significant after stratifying for age, sex, insurance status, ethnicity, and urban/rural status (P < .05). For emergency admissions, there was no difference in receipt of surgery by social vulnerability index. CONCLUSION: Vulnerable patients are less likely to undergo elective surgical hernia repair, even after adjusting for demographics, insurance, and urbanicity. The social vulnerability index may be a useful indicator of social determinants of health barriers to hernia repair.


Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal , Herniorrafia , Humanos , Adolescente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Texas/epidemiologia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Vulnerabilidade Social , Estudos de Coortes , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia
2.
J Vasc Surg ; 75(3): 962-967, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34601048

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is most often referred to vascular surgeons. However, there is a lack of understanding of the malpractice cases involving TOS. The goal of this study is to better understand the medicolegal landscape related to the care of TOS. METHODS: The Westlaw Edge AI-powered proprietary system was retrospectively reviewed for malpractice cases involving TOS. A Boolean search strategy was used to identify target cases under the case category of "Jury Verdicts & Settlements" for all state and federal jurisdictions from 1970 to September 2020. The settled case was described but not included in the statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to report our findings, and when appropriate. The P ≤ .05 decision rule was established a priori as the null hypothesis rejection criterion to determine associations between jury verdicts outcomes and state's tort reform status. RESULTS: In this study, 39 cases were identified and met the study's inclusion criteria from the entire Westlaw Edge database. Among plaintiffs who disclosed age and/or gender, median age was 35.0 years with a female majority (67.6%). Cases involving TOS were noted to be steadily decreasing since the mid-1990s. The cases were unevenly spread across 18 states, with the highest number of cases (14, 35.9%) from California and the second highest (4, 10.3%) from Pennsylvania. A similar uneven distribution was seen among U.S. census regions, in which the West had the highest cases (39.5%). The study revealed that more cases were brought to trials in tort reform states (26, 68.4%) than in non-tort reform states (12, 31.6%). A total of 24 of 39 (61.5%) plaintiffs had one specific claim, which resulted in their economic and noneconomic damages. Negligent operation and treatment complication represented an overwhelming majority of claims brought by 38 of 39 plaintiffs (97.4%). Misdiagnosis and lack of informed consent were both brought nine times (23.1%) by the group. Intraoperative nerve injury (20 patients, 51.3%) was the most commonly reported complication. Excluding one case with a settlement of $965,000, 30 of 38 (78.9%) cases went to trials and received defense verdicts. Eight cases (20.5%) were found in favor of plaintiffs with a median payout of $725,581. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted higher than average payouts to plaintiffs and risk factors that may result in malpractice lawsuits for surgeons undertaking TOS treatment. Future studies are needed to further clarify the relationships between tort reform and outcomes of malpractice cases involving TOS.


Assuntos
Compensação e Reparação , Descompressão Cirúrgica/economia , Seguro de Responsabilidade Civil/economia , Responsabilidade Legal/economia , Imperícia/economia , Erros Médicos/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Síndrome do Desfiladeiro Torácico/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/economia , Adulto , Compensação e Reparação/legislação & jurisprudência , Bases de Dados Factuais , Descompressão Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Descompressão Cirúrgica/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro de Responsabilidade Civil/legislação & jurisprudência , Masculino , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Formulação de Políticas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Síndrome do Desfiladeiro Torácico/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/legislação & jurisprudência
3.
Surgery ; 170(6): 1718-1726, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34362585

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Frequency, microbiology, and outcomes of necrotizing soft tissue infections vary based on locoregional and environmental factors; however, there has been no global survey of these patterns. We performed a systematic review/meta-analysis on published reports of necrotizing soft tissue infections from across the globe. METHODS: Peer-reviewed empirical studies examining rates of polymicrobial and monomicrobial necrotizing soft tissue infections with microbial isolation and overall mortality rate were extracted along with geographic location using PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, and Web of Science. Random-effects meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed, adjusting for publication bias. Meta-regression analyses examined moderator effects of risk factors. RESULTS: One hundred and five studies (8,718 total patients) were included. Pooled prevalence of polymicrobial and monomicrobial infections were 53% and 37.9%, respectively. Truncal necrotizing soft tissue infections were commonly polymicrobial (P < .001), whereas monomicrobial infections prevailed in extremities (P = .008). Global prevalence of monomicrobial necrotizing soft tissue infections was observed to increase by 1.1% annually (P = .003). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism globally and in North America, Asia, the Middle East, and Africa, followed by Streptococcus pyogenes and Escherichia coli. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus accounted for 16% of necrotizing soft tissue infections globally. Overall mortality was 23.1%, observed to decline globally over the last decade (P = .020). No regional differences were noted for mortality. CONCLUSION: Although polymicrobial infections remain predominant worldwide, the incidence of monomicrobial infections is increasing. The observed decline in necrotizing soft tissue infection-related mortality is encouraging and may reflect advances in management, despite major variations in available healthcare resources globally.


Assuntos
Coinfecção/epidemiologia , Infecções por Escherichia coli/epidemiologia , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/epidemiologia , Coinfecção/diagnóstico , Coinfecção/microbiologia , Coinfecção/terapia , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Escherichia coli/diagnóstico , Infecções por Escherichia coli/microbiologia , Infecções por Escherichia coli/terapia , Carga Global da Doença/tendências , Humanos , Incidência , Mortalidade/tendências , Necrose/epidemiologia , Necrose/microbiologia , Necrose/terapia , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/diagnóstico , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/microbiologia , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/terapia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/terapia , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estreptocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/terapia , Streptococcus pyogenes/isolamento & purificação , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
J Vasc Surg ; 74(2S): 2S-5S, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34303457

RESUMO

Healthcare disparities are a serious problem that shorten the lives of many Americans, even after accounting for social, cultural, and economic factors and correcting for confounders such as the lack of medical insurance and access to healthcare, black Americans and other minority groups receive worse medical care and experience worse outcomes as a result. Healthcare does not occur in a vacuum; surgeons cannot serve our patients' needs isolated in a bubble and cocooned from larger societal concerns. Although disparities rooted in race likely have the greatest negative effects on our patients' health, plenty of groups exist that have not historically received equal opportunities and acceptance within the surgical world. Despite now accounting for more than one half of all medical graduates, women remain underrepresented in leadership positions, and the gender pay gap has remained significant in all branches of medicine. It will require active, multifaceted, and sustained effort to increase diversity, equity, and inclusion in academic surgery. We have described the steps that can be taken within surgical departments and in national surgical societies to recruit, retain, and foster a diverse surgical workforce and to develop a more inclusive culture within surgery and surgical training.


Assuntos
Diversidade Cultural , Equidade de Gênero , Princípios Morais , Seleção de Pessoal , Médicas , Racismo , Sexismo , Cirurgiões , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares , Assistência à Saúde Culturalmente Competente/etnologia , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Direitos Humanos , Humanos , Liderança , Masculino , Mentores , Fatores Raciais , Fatores Sexuais , Sociedades Médicas , Cirurgiões/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/educação
5.
J Surg Res ; 262: 240-243, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33549329

RESUMO

As the SARS-COV-2 pandemic created the need for social distancing and the implementation of nonessential travel bans, residency and fellowship programs have moved toward a web-based virtual process for applicant interviews. As part of the Society of Asian Academic Surgeons 5th Annual Meeting, an expert panel was convened to provide guidance for prospective applicants who are new to the process. This article provides perspectives from applicants who have successfully navigated the surgical subspecialty fellowship process, as well as program leadership who have held virtual interviews.


Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Internato e Residência/organização & administração , Seleção de Pessoal/métodos , Comunicação por Videoconferência/organização & administração , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/transmissão , Certificação/organização & administração , Certificação/normas , Docentes/psicologia , Docentes/normas , Bolsas de Estudo/organização & administração , Bolsas de Estudo/normas , Humanos , Internato e Residência/normas , Liderança , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Seleção de Pessoal/organização & administração , Seleção de Pessoal/normas , Distanciamento Físico , Interação Social , Conselhos de Especialidade Profissional , Cirurgiões/psicologia , Cirurgiões/normas
6.
Am J Surg ; 219(2): 295-298, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31629464

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Surgical cost is astronomical in the US and instrument standardization is one potential mechanism for cost savings. This study describes a core competency based, multidisciplinary curriculum and evaluates resident attitudes towards operating room equipment standardization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As part of a quality improvement initiative, surgery residents participated in an hour-long mixed curriculum consisting of brief didactics and small group exercises. Participants developed an equipment standardization plan for laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy. Participants also completed surveys to assess their attitudes towards 11 potential barriers to implementation as "improves, no change, or worsens". RESULTS: Fifteen general surgery residents participated. In general, participants felt that standardization improves or does not change metrics including surgeon autonomy, resident training experience, and patient safety. CONCLUSION: Our pilot curriculum addresses a gap in resident education about surgical cost. Residents generally regard equipment standardization as either improving or not changing hospital metrics.


Assuntos
Redução de Custos , Currículo , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos/economia , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos/normas , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Internato e Residência , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estados Unidos
7.
J Burn Care Res ; 37(1): e56-62, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26594862

RESUMO

The objective of this article is to explore the impact of socioeconomic status on outcome metrics in post-burn injury patients. Retrospective review of patients with TBSA >15% between 2005 and 2012. Demographics and clinical course were recorded. Socioeconomics were approximated using census data of percent below poverty level at patient zip code, which was also used for calculating distance to regional burn center. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Analysis Software. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated followed by regression models for factors associated with graft loss and readmission. Two hundred and fifty subjects survived to discharge: 33% were of upper socioeconomic status, 32% were of middle status, and 35% were of lower status. Fourteen percentage of patients lived <99 miles from the burn center, 60% 100 to 249 miles away, and 26% >240 miles away. Eighty readmissions occurred among 39 patients; 43% were unplanned. Each percent increase in TBSA was associated with a 5% increase in likelihood of being readmitted. Thirty six percentage of readmission patients were covered under worker's compensation. Patients with worker's compensation were four times more likely to be readmitted than private insurance. Only worker's compensation had a majority of unplanned readmissions (58%). Graft loss occurred in 12% of patients. Those in the low socioeconomic group had five times the odds of having graft loss than those in the high socioeconomics. There was no correlation between graft loss and insurance status or distance. Findings indicate strong and statistically significant correlations between type of insurance and likelihood of readmission and between graft loss and poverty.


Assuntos
Queimaduras/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Queimaduras/diagnóstico , Queimaduras/terapia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
8.
Am J Surg ; 204(6): 988-94; discussion 994-5, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23103293

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue infections have historically been diagnosed on the basis of clinical signs and symptoms. A trend toward the increased use of computed tomographic (CT) imaging in their evaluation has been noted. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of soft tissue infection admissions in 2003 and 2004 and in 2009 and 2010. Intracavitary abscesses (eg, intra-abdominal, pelvic) that would not be evident on physical examination were excluded. Demographic and outcome variables, number of CT scans by body region, and total effective radiation dose were recorded. Radiation exposure was stratified into low, moderate, high, and very high categories. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the number of patients receiving ≥1 CT scan for initial diagnosis, from 36.7% in the early cohort to 50% in the later cohort (P < .001). The mean cumulative effective dose increased from 5.46 to 7.82 mSv (P = .007). Greater proportions of patients fell into the moderate (32.9% vs 24.5%) and high (6.8% vs 10.6%) radiation exposure categories. CONCLUSIONS: CT scans are increasingly used in the evaluation of soft tissue infections, with resultant increase in radiation exposure.


Assuntos
Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Desnecessários/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doses de Radiação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/economia , Texas , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/efeitos adversos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/tendências , Procedimentos Desnecessários/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Desnecessários/economia , Procedimentos Desnecessários/tendências , Adulto Jovem
9.
Am J Surg ; 198(6): 787-91, 2009 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19969130

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is widely accepted that mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with irradiation yield similar results, yet many women continue to receive mastectomy. This study evaluates factors contributing to surgical decision-making in breast cancer. Registry data were obtained on all patients treated at the Southwest Cancer Treatment and Research Center (SWCTRC) between 2002 and 2006. Patient demographics, including age and race, and insurance type, tumor characteristics, surgical procedure performed, lymph node status, stage, adjuvant therapy, and outcome were analyzed against mastectomy versus BCS using bivariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: There was a higher proportion of uninsured patients in the mastectomy cohort, which also included more patients with later stage disease, larger tumor size, and a higher number of lymph node metastases. The only independent predictors of BCS were fewer lymph node metastases and having insurance. Patients with private insurance were almost 4 times more likely to receive BCS (odds ratio 3.90, 95% confidence interval 1.20-12.67). CONCLUSIONS: Insurance status is an important predictor determining whether a patient receives BCS or mastectomy for breast cancer.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Mastectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Setor Privado
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA