Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Microsc ; 284(1): 56-73, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34214188

RESUMO

A modern day light microscope has evolved from a tool devoted to making primarily empirical observations to what is now a sophisticated , quantitative device that is an integral part of both physical and life science research. Nowadays, microscopes are found in nearly every experimental laboratory. However, despite their prevalent use in capturing and quantifying scientific phenomena, neither a thorough understanding of the principles underlying quantitative imaging techniques nor appropriate knowledge of how to calibrate, operate and maintain microscopes can be taken for granted. This is clearly demonstrated by the well-documented and widespread difficulties that are routinely encountered in evaluating acquired data and reproducing scientific experiments. Indeed, studies have shown that more than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to repeat another scientist's experiments, while more than half have even failed to reproduce their own experiments. One factor behind the reproducibility crisis of experiments published in scientific journals is the frequent underreporting of imaging methods caused by a lack of awareness and/or a lack of knowledge of the applied technique. Whereas quality control procedures for some methods used in biomedical research, such as genomics (e.g. DNA sequencing, RNA-seq) or cytometry, have been introduced (e.g. ENCODE), this issue has not been tackled for optical microscopy instrumentation and images. Although many calibration standards and protocols have been published, there is a lack of awareness and agreement on common standards and guidelines for quality assessment and reproducibility. In April 2020, the QUality Assessment and REProducibility for instruments and images in Light Microscopy (QUAREP-LiMi) initiative was formed. This initiative comprises imaging scientists from academia and industry who share a common interest in achieving a better understanding of the performance and limitations of microscopes and improved quality control (QC) in light microscopy. The ultimate goal of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative is to establish a set of common QC standards, guidelines, metadata models and tools, including detailed protocols, with the ultimate aim of improving reproducible advances in scientific research. This White Paper (1) summarizes the major obstacles identified in the field that motivated the launch of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative; (2) identifies the urgent need to address these obstacles in a grassroots manner, through a community of stakeholders including, researchers, imaging scientists, bioimage analysts, bioimage informatics developers, corporate partners, funding agencies, standards organizations, scientific publishers and observers of such; (3) outlines the current actions of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative and (4) proposes future steps that can be taken to improve the dissemination and acceptance of the proposed guidelines to manage QC. To summarize, the principal goal of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative is to improve the overall quality and reproducibility of light microscope image data by introducing broadly accepted standard practices and accurately captured image data metrics.


Assuntos
Microscopia , Padrões de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
4.
Science ; 300(5616): 142-5, 2003 Apr 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12677069

RESUMO

Transformed rat fibroblasts expressing two variants of green fluorescent protein, each fused to beta-actin, were used to study actin dynamics during cell protrusion. The recently developed FLAP (fluorescence localization after photobleaching) method permits the tracking of one fluorophore after localized photobleaching by using the other as a colocalized reference. Here, by visualizing the ratio of bleached to total molecules, we found that actin was delivered to protruding zones of the leading edge of the cell at speeds that exceeded 5 micrometers per second. Monte Carlo modeling confirmed that this flow cannot be explained by diffusion and may involve active transport.


Assuntos
Actinas/metabolismo , Depsipeptídeos , Pseudópodes/fisiologia , Pseudópodes/ultraestrutura , Amidas/farmacologia , Animais , Azepinas/farmacologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/metabolismo , Transporte Biológico Ativo , Biopolímeros , Linhagem Celular Transformada , Movimento Celular , Difusão , Inibidores Enzimáticos/farmacologia , Fluorescência , Recuperação de Fluorescência Após Fotodegradação , Fluorometria , Proteínas de Fluorescência Verde , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Peptídeos e Proteínas de Sinalização Intracelular , Proteínas Luminescentes/metabolismo , Microscopia Confocal , Método de Monte Carlo , Quinase de Cadeia Leve de Miosina/antagonistas & inibidores , Quinase de Cadeia Leve de Miosina/metabolismo , Naftalenos/farmacologia , Nocodazol/farmacologia , Peptídeos Cíclicos/farmacologia , Fotodegradação , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinases/antagonistas & inibidores , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinases/metabolismo , Transporte Proteico/efeitos dos fármacos , Pseudópodes/efeitos dos fármacos , Piridinas/farmacologia , Ratos , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/metabolismo , Células Tumorais Cultivadas , Quinases Associadas a rho
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA