Is Formal Research Training Associated With Academic Success in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery?

PURPOSE: Pursuing promotion in academic rank and seeking funded research opportunities are core elements of academic practice. Our purpose was to assess whether formal research training influences academic rank or National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding among full-time academic oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of full-time academic OMSs in the United States. The primary predictor variable was completion of formal research training, defined as a research fellowship or advanced non-clinical doctoral research degree (PhD, DMSc, DPH, DPhil, ScD). The outcomes measures were current academic rank and successful acquisition of NIH funding (yes vs no). Other study variables included MD degree, clinical fellowship training, years since training completion, and Hirsch index (H-index), a measure of academic productivity. We computed the descriptive, bivariate, and multiple regression models and set P ≤ .05 as significant. RESULTS: A total of 299 full-time academic OMSs were included in the study sample. Of the 299 OMSs, 41 (13.7%) had had formal research training. Surgeons with formal research training had a greater mean interval since completion of training (P = 0.01) and had a greater mean H-index (P = 0.02). Formal research training was not associated with academic rank (P = .10) but was associated with an increased likelihood of receiving NIH funding (P < .001). In a multiple logistic regression model, after adjusting for years since completing training and H-index, formal research training was associated with an increased likelihood of obtaining NIH funding (odds ratio, 3.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.15 to 9.00; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Among academic OMSs, those with formal research training had greater success with obtaining NIH funding. However, formal research training did not appear to influence an OMS's current academic rank.

Do Quantitative Measures of Research Productivity Correlate with Academic Rank in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery?

Academic promotion is linked to research productivity. The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation between quantitative measures of academic productivity and academic rank among academic oral and maxillofacial surgeons. This was a cross-sectional study of full-time academic oral and maxillofacial surgeons in the United States. The predictor variables were categorized as demographic (gender, medical degree, research doctorate, other advanced degree) and quantitative measures of academic productivity (total number of publications, total number of citations, maximum number of citations for a single article, I-10 index [number of publications with ≥ 10 citations], and h-index [number of publications h with ≥ h citations each]). The outcome variable was current academic rank (instructor, assistant professor, associate professor, professor, or endowed professor). Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple regression statistics were computed to evaluate associations between the predictors and academic rank. Receiver-operator characteristic curves were computed to identify thresholds for academic promotion. The sample consisted of 324 academic oral and maxillofacial surgeons, of whom 11.7% were female, 40% had medical degrees, and 8% had research doctorates. The h-index was the most strongly correlated with academic rank (ρ = 0.62, p < 0.001). H-indexes of ≥ 4, ≥ 8, and ≥ 13 were identified as thresholds for promotion to associate professor, professor, and endowed professor, respectively (p < 0.001). This study found that the h-index was strongly correlated with academic rank among oral and maxillofacial surgery faculty members and thus suggests that promotions committees should consider using the h-index as an additional method to assess research activity.

Nine-year trend analysis of hospitalizations attributed to oral and oropharyngeal cancers in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: This study examines 9-year discharge patterns and changes in outcomes in oral cancer hospitalizations in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: All hospitalizations with primary diagnosis of oral and oropharyngeal cancers were selected from 2000 to 2008 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Association between outcomes (in-hospital mortality, length of stay [LOS], hospital charges, and discharge status) and independent variables was examined using multivariable regression analyses. RESULTS: Of 146,928 hospitalizations, 5310 died in hospitals. Mean LOS was 6.7 days. Mean hospitalization charges ranged from $47,331 to $62,885. After adjusting for confounders, in-hospital morality and charges did not vary while LOS decreased. Hospitalizations occurring in 2004-2008 were more likely to be discharged to long-term facilities (odds ratio = 1.24-1.59, P < .05) compared with those in 2000. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates changes in longitudinal trends in socio-demographic and hospital-related factors. Our results do not provide compelling evidence on whether hospitals are saving cost or shifting cost to another type of facility.

Effect of occurrence of infection-related never events on length of stay and hospital charges in patients undergoing radical neck dissection for head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact of infection-related never events (postoperative pneumonia, Clostridium difficile infection, infection with microorganisms resistant to penicillin, postoperative infections, and decubitus ulcers) following radical neck dissections for head and neck cancers. STUDY DESIGN: The 2008 Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to select hospitalizations with HNC that underwent radical neck dissections. Predictor variables were occurrence of never events and other patient- and hospital-level factors. Outcome variables were hospitalization charges and length of stay (LOS). Regression analyses were used to measure the association between predictors and outcomes. RESULTS: Among 10,660 hospitalizations, prevalence of never events ranged from 0.2% to 5.0%. Mean hospitalization charge and LOS were $75,654 and 6.8 days, respectively. Never events were associated with 5.6-10.0 longer LOS and $49,153-$124,057 excess charges. CONCLUSION: Occurrence of never events was associated with at least 5.6 longer hospital days and $49,153 charge compared with hospitalizations without a never event.

Surveillance as a management strategy for retained third molars: is it desirable?

The purpose of the present report was to define and advocate active surveillance compared with follow-up as needed (prn follow-up), as the preferred management strategy for patients who elect to retain their third molars (M3s). Active surveillance, a nonoperative management strategy for retained M3s, is characterized as a prescribed, regularly scheduled set of follow-up visits that include both clinical and radiographic examinations. Given that the risk of complications with M3 removal are age related, the rationale for recommending active surveillance instead of "prn follow-up" is that the frequency of future disease among retained M3s is sufficiently high to warrant routine scheduled follow-up visits to detect and treat disease before it becomes symptomatic. Symptomatic disease is a late finding. Patients electing active surveillance as their preferred management strategy might not avoid operative treatment in the future, but it should increase their chances of being diagnosed at the youngest age possible, thus minimizing the age-related operative complications. The author recommends that the frequency of follow-up visits be approximately every 24 months and the examination be completed by a specialist or general dentist. Active surveillance as a management strategy is based on level 5 evidence (ie, expert opinion).

Does computed tomographic assessment of inferior alveolar canal cortical integrity predict nerve exposure during third molar surgery?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between computed tomographic (CT) assessment of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) canal cortical integrity and intraoperative IAN exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. The study sample included patients considered at high risk for IAN injury based on panoramic findings. The primary predictor variable was IAN canal integrity (intact or interrupted) assessed on coronal CT images. The secondary predictor variable was length of the cortical defect, in millimeters. The primary outcome variable was intraoperative visualization of the IAN. Other variables were demographic and operative parameters. Bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the unadjusted and adjusted associations between the cortical integrity and IAN exposure. Diagnostic test characteristics were computed for cortical integrity and threshold cortical defect size. A P value < or = 0.05 was statistically significant. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 51 subjects (57% female) with a mean age of 35.2 +/- 12.8 years. Of the 80 third molars available for evaluation, 52 third molars (64.1%) had evidence of loss of cortical integrity. The mean cortical defect length was 2.9 +/- 2.6 mm. Loss of cortical integrity had a high sensitivity (> or = 0.88) but low specificity (< or = 0.49) as a diagnostic test for IAN visualization. A cortical defect size > or = 3 mm was associated with an increased risk for intraoperative IAN visualization with a high sensitivity and specificity (> or = 0.82). CONCLUSION: Cortical defect size on a maxillofacial CT has a high sensitivity and specificity for predicting intraoperative IAN exposure during third molar removal.

A comparison of patient satisfaction and objective assessment of neurosensory function after trigeminal nerve repair.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare objective and subjective assessments of neurosensory function after trigeminal nerve repair. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using a sample of patients who underwent surgical repair of trigeminal nerve injuries. The primary study variables were categorized as objective or subjective. The objective variable was the change in neurosensory examination between preoperative and 1-year postoperative visits. Neurosensory status was measured using an ordinal scale ranging from anesthetic (0) to normal (4). Subjective variables included patient satisfaction with the nerve repair and patient assessment of injury-related oral dysfunction. Demographic, anatomic, and operative variables were also collected. Appropriate univariate and bivariate statistics were computed. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 19 patients (14 female, 17 Caucasian) who had trigeminal nerve repair (17 lingual, 2 inferior alveolar). The mean duration between injury and repair was 4.5 +/- 2.3 months; between repair and postoperative assessment was 11.9 +/- 0.9 months. The mean change in neurosensory status was 1.3 +/- 1.0 levels. The majority of patients (63.1%) rated their satisfaction with the outcome of treatment as "good" to "excellent." There was a statistically significant correlation between change in neurosensory status and patient satisfaction (rho = 0.86; P < .01). CONCLUSION: There is evidence of a strong correlation between improvement in the neurosensory examination following trigeminal nerve repair and patient satisfaction with the surgical outcome 1-year postoperatively. Patients who experience greater neurosensory improvement also report lower frequencies of related oral dysfunction.