Can ultrasound help to overcome uncertainty in clinical joint assessment in juvenile idiopathic arthritis?

OBJECTIVES: Assessment of active synovitis is crucial for the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). We aimed to investigate the correlation of musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) and clinical examination results and relate them to arthritis relapse rate. METHODS: JIA patients with questionable presence of active arthritis (Q-joints) and controls (JIA and healthy children) were recruited. MSUS of Q-joints, active joints and their inactive counterparts was performed at study entry. Standard disease activity parameters were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: Of 481 joints of 138 JIA patients, 99 joints (20.6%) of 58 patients had one or more Q-joints with 54/99 (54.5%) having MSUS features of active disease. Clinically inactive joints had lower proportion of MSUS synovitis (78/253, 30.8%) while MSUS activity was present in 114/129 (88.4%) of clinically active joints and in 2/105 (1.9%) joints of 36 healthy controls. Within the 15-month follow-up 23/99 (22%) Q-joints and 31/253 (12%) clinically inactive joints relapsed. Joints with subclinical synovitis relapsed more frequently than MSUS inactive ones (p<0.001). The relapse rate was higher in MSUS-active Q-joints (19/23, 82%) than in clinically inactive ones (16/31, 52%) with MSUS synovial hypertrophy as the main relapse predictor in multivariate analysis. Ankle and knee joints relapsed most frequently. CONCLUSIONS: Acknowledgement of joints with questionable synovitis may contribute to the assessment of disease activity in JIA. Presence of MSUS synovitis carries a clinically meaningful risk of disease recurrence in these joints. In clinical practice, our findings encourage timely MSUS assessment of the joints in question, especially in patients without any other features of active disease.

The European network for care of children with paediatric rheumatic diseases: care across borders.

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of the paediatric rheumatology (PR) services in Europe, describe current delivery of care and training, set standards for care, identify unmet needs and inform future specialist service provision. METHODS: An online survey was developed and presented to national coordinating centres of the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) (country survey) and to individual PR centres (centre and disease surveys) as a part of the European Union (EU) Single Hub and Access point for paediatric Rheumatology in Europe project. The survey contained components covering the organization of PR care, composition of teams, education, health care and research facilities and assessment of needs. RESULTS: Response rates were 29/35 (83%) for country surveys and 164/288 (57%) for centre surveys. Across the EU, approximately one paediatric rheumatologist is available per million population. In all EU member states there is good access to specialist care and medications, although biologic drug availability is worse in Eastern European countries. PR education is widely available for physicians but is insufficient for allied health professionals. The ability to participate in clinical trials is generally high. Important gaps were identified, including lack of standardized clinical guidelines/recommendations and insufficient adolescent transition management planning. CONCLUSION: This study provides a comprehensive description of current specialist PR service provision across Europe and did not reveal any major differences between EU member states. Rarity, chronicity and complexity of diseases are major challenges to PR care. Future work should facilitate the development, dissemination and implementation of standards of care, treatment and service recommendations to further improve patient-centred health care across Europe.

The Czech version of the Juvenile Arthritis Multidimensional Assessment Report (JAMAR).

The Juvenile Arthritis Multidimensional Assessment Report (JAMAR) is a new parent/patient-reported outcome measure that enables a thorough assessment of the disease status in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). We report results of the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the parent and patient versions of the JAMAR in the Czech language. The reading comprehension of the questionnaire was tested in ten JIA parents and patients. The participating centre was asked to collect demographic and clinical data along the JAMAR questionnaire in 100 consecutive JIA patients or all consecutive patients seen in a 6-month period and to administer the JAMAR to 100 healthy children and their parents. The statistical validation phase explored descriptive statistics and the psychometric issues of the JAMAR: the three Likert assumptions, floor/ceiling effects, internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha, interscale correlations, test-retest reliability, and construct validity (convergent and discriminant validity). A total of 103 JIA patients (5.8% systemic, 35.9% oligoarticular, 37.9% RF-negative polyarthritis, 20.4% other categories) and 100 healthy children, were enrolled. The JAMAR components discriminated well healthy subjects from JIA patients. Notably, there was no significant difference between healthy subjects and their affected peers in the school-related problems variable and in the Psychosocial Health of the Paediatric Rheumatology Quality of Life scale. All JAMAR components revealed good psychometric performances. In conclusion, the Czech version of the JAMAR is a valid tool for the assessment of children with JIA and is suitable for use both in routine clinical practice and clinical research.

Disease activity assessment in childhood vasculitis: development and preliminary validation of the Paediatric Vasculitis Activity Score (PVAS).

BACKGROUND: Rare chronic childhood vasculitides lack a reliable disease activity assessment tool. With emerging new treatment modalities such a tool has become increasingly essential for both clinical practice and therapeutic trials to reproducibly quantify change in disease state. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a paediatric vasculitis activity assessment tool based on modification of the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVASv.3). METHODS: A paediatric vasculitis registry was reviewed to identify clinical features missing in the BVASv.3. A modified nominal group technique was used to develop a working version of the Paediatric Vasculitis Activity Score (PVAS). Prospective validation provided tool reliability, reproducibility and responsiveness to change. Training of assessors was done according to the BVAS principles. RESULTS: BVAS items were redefined (n=22) and eight paediatric items added in Cutaneous (n=4), Cardiovascular (n=3) and Abdominal (n=1) sections. The final PVAS has 64 active items in nine categories. The principles of new/worse and persistently active disease were retained as were the overall score and weighting of categories. The median PVAS in 63 children with systemic vasculitis was 4/63 (0-38/63). There was a high interobserver agreement for the overall as well as for subsystem scores (linear-weighted-κ ≥0.87). PVAS correlated with physician's global assessment (p<0.01); treatment decision (p=<0.01) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (p=0.01). In response to treatment, 15/19 patients assessed demonstrated a significant fall in PVAS (p=0.002), with good agreement among assessors for this change. CONCLUSIONS: The PVAS validity in children with systemic vasculitis was demonstrated. Like the BVAS, we anticipate that the PVAS will provide a robust tool to objectively define disease activity for clinical trials and future research.

Performance of Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score and disease extent index in childhood vasculitides.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) v3 and the Disease Extent Index (DEI) for the assessment of disease activity in 4 primary childhood (c-) systemic vasculitides. METHODS: Patients fulfilling the EULAR/PRINTO/PRES (Ankara) c-vasculitis classification criteria for Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP), childhood (c) polyarteritis nodosa (c-PAN), c-Wegener's granulomatosis (c-WG) and c-Takayasu arteritis (c-TA) with disease duration at the time of diagnosis ≤3 months were extracted from the PRINTO database. The performance of the BVAS and DEI were examined by assessing convergent validity, the pattern of disease involvement, and responsiveness. We also evaluated alternative unweighted scoring methods for both tools. RESULTS: The analysis set included 796 patients with 669 HSP, 80 c-PAN, 25 c-WG and 22 c-TA. The median age at diagnosis was 6.9 years (6.6-12) and median delay in making the diagnosis from the onset of signs/symptoms was 0.01 (0.003-0.027) years. A strong correlation was found between the BVAS and DEI (rs=0.78) while correlation with the physician global assessment was moderate (rs=0.48) with BVAS and poor with DEI (rs=0.25). Both the BVAS and DEI sub-scores and total scores were able to descrive the disease involvement in the 4 childhood vasculitides. Responsiveness was large (>1.5) for both tools. The performance characteristics of the BVAS and DEI with the unweighted methods were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that both the BVAS and DEI are valid tools for the assessment of the level of disease activity in a large cohort of childhood acute and chronic vasculitides.

Development and initial validation of composite parent- and child-centered disease assessment indices for juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a parent-centered and a child-centered composite disease assessment index for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA): the Juvenile Arthritis Parent Assessment Index (JAPAI) and the Juvenile Arthritis Child Assessment Index (JACAI), respectively. METHODS: The JAPAI and the JACAI include 4 measures: parent/child rating of overall well-being, pain, physical function, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Validation analyses were conducted on nearly 5,000 patients and included assessment of construct validity, discriminant validity, responsiveness to change, and reliability. Besides the 4-item version, a 3-item version of both indices, which did not include HRQOL, was tested. RESULTS: The JAPAI and the JACAI demonstrated good construct validity, yielding high correlations with the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score and moderate correlations with physician global rating and joint counts. Correlations obtained for the JAPAI and the JACAI and for the 4-item and the 3-item versions were comparable. Factorial analysis by principal component analysis showed that both indices are monodimensional. Both the JAPAI and JACAI discriminated well between different disease states and courses and between different levels of American College of Rheumatology Pediatric criteria in a clinical trial, and revealed fair responsiveness to clinical change. Internal consistency was satisfactory, with a Cronbach's alpha of >0.80 in all but 1 of the patient samples tested. CONCLUSION: The JAPAI and the JACAI were found to be valid instruments for assessment of disease status in JIA and suitable surrogates of physicians' evaluations. Both indices are potentially applicable in clinical practice, observational studies, and therapeutic trials.