Applicability assessment for in-silico patient-specific TEVAR procedures.

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) is a minimally invasive technique to treat thoracic aorta pathologies and consists of placing a self-expandable stent-graft into the pathological region to restore the vessel lumen and recreate a more physiological condition. Exhaustive computational models, namely the finite element analysis, can be implemented to reproduce the clinical procedure. In this context, numerical models, if used for clinical applications, must be reliable and the simulation credibility should be proved to predict clinical procedure outcomes or to build in-silico clinical trials. This work aims first at applying a previously validated TEVAR methodology to a patient-specific case. Then, defining the TEVAR procedure performed on a patient population as the context of use, the overall applicability of the TEVAR modeling is assessed to demonstrate the reliability of the model itself following a step-by-step method based on the ASME V&V40 protocol. Validation evidence sources are identified for the specific context of use and adopted to demonstrate the applicability of the numerical procedure, thereby answering a question of interest that evaluates the deployed stent-graft configuration in the vessel.

Quality-of-life assessment in patients treated with radiofrequency ablation with or without great saphenous vein recanalization.

Quality of life (QoL) in patients with chronic venous disorders has a central role to decide the correct treatment approach. In particular, in case of mini-invasive therapy, such as endovenous radiofrequency ablation (RFA), the postoperative QoL improvement remains one of the most important outcome to be reached. Despite this, very few data are published on the long-term QoL modifications after RFA. The aim of this brief report is to describe and analyze the role of QoL scales in a population of patients treated with RFA of the great saphenous vein and phlebectomies, highlighting results in short- and long-term follow-up period, and differences between recanalized and non-recanalized patients.