Characterizing the lack of diversity in musculoskeletal urgent care website content.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal urgent care centers (MUCCs) are becoming an alternative to emergency departments for non-emergent orthopedic injuries as they can provide direct access to orthopedic specialty care. However, they tend to be located in more affluent geographies and are less likely to accept Medicaid insurance than general urgent care centers. MUCCs utilize websites to drive patients to their centers, and the content may influence patients' consumer behaviors and perceptions of the quality and accessibility of the MUCCs. Given that some MUCCs target insured patient populations, we evaluated the racial, gender, and body type diversity of website content for MUCCs. METHODS: Our group conducted an online search to create a list of MUCCs in the United States. For each MUCC, we analyzed the content featured prominently on the website (above the fold). For each website, we analyzed the race, gender, and body type of the featured model(s). MUCCs were classified according to their affiliation (i.e. academic versus private) and region (i.e. Northeast versus South). We performed chi-squared and univariate logistic regression to investigate trends in MUCC website content. RESULTS: We found that 14% (32/235) of website graphics featured individuals from multiple racial groups, 57% (135/235) of graphics featured women, and 2% (5/235) of graphics featured overweight or obese individuals. Multiracial presence in website graphics was associated with the presence of women on the websites and Medicaid acceptance. CONCLUSION: MUCC website content has the potential to impact patients' perceptions of medical providers and the medical care they receive. Most MUCC websites lack diversity based on race and body type. The lack of diversity in website content at MUCCs may introduce further disparities in access to orthopedic care.

Preoperative Risk Management Programs at the Top 50 Orthopaedic Institutions Frequently Enforce Strict Cutoffs for BMI and Hemoglobin A1c Which May Limit Access to Total Joint Arthroplasty and Provide Limited Resources for Smoking Cessation and Dental Care.

BACKGROUND: Performing elective orthopaedic surgery on patients with high BMI, poorly controlled hyperglycemia, and who use tobacco can lead to serious complications. Some surgeons use cutoffs for BMI, hemoglobin A1c, and cigarette smoking to limit surgery to patients with lower risk profiles rather than engaging in shared decision-making with patients about those factors. Other studies have suggested this practice may discriminate against people of lower income levels and women. However, the extent to which this practice approach is used by orthopaedic surgeons at leading hospitals is unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How often are preoperative cutoffs for hemoglobin A1c and BMI used at the top US orthopaedic institutions? (2) What services are available at the top orthopaedic institutions for weight loss, smoking cessation, and dental care? (3) What proportion of hospital-provided weight loss clinics, smoking cessation programs, and dental care clinics accept Medicaid insurance? METHODS: To investigate preoperative cutoffs for hemoglobin A1c and BMI and patient access to nonorthopaedic specialists at the top orthopaedic hospitals in the United States, we collected data on the top 50 orthopaedic hospitals in the United States as ranked by the 2020 US News and World Report 's "Best Hospitals for Orthopedics" list. We used a surgeon-targeted email survey to ascertain information regarding the use of preoperative cutoffs for hemoglobin A1c and BMI and availability and insurance acceptance policies of weight loss and dental clinics. Surgeons were informed that the survey was designed to assess how their institution manages preoperative risk management. The survey was sent to one practicing arthroplasty surgeon, the chair of the arthroplasty service, or department chair, whenever possible, at the top 50 orthopaedic institutions. Reminder emails were sent periodically to encourage participation from nonresponding institutions. We received survey responses from 70% (35 of 50) of hospitals regarding the use of preoperative hemoglobin A1c and BMI cutoffs. There was no difference in the response rate based on hospital ranking or hospital region. Fewer responses were received regarding the availability and Medicaid acceptance of weight loss and dental clinics. We used a "secret shopper" methodology (defined as when a researcher calls a facility pretending to be a patient seeking care) to gather information from hospitals directly. The use of deception in this study was approved by our institution's institutional review board. We called the main telephone line at each institution and spoke with the telephone operator at each hospital asking standardized questions regarding the availability of medical or surgical weight loss clinics, smoking cessation programs, and dental clinics. When possible, researchers were referred directly to the relevant departments and asked phone receptionists if the clinic accepted Medicaid. We were able to contact every hospital using the main telephone number. Our first research question was answered using solely the surgeon survey responses. Our second and third research questions were addressed using a combination of the responses to the surgeon surveys and specific hospital telephone calls. RESULTS: Preoperative hemoglobin A1c cutoffs were used at 77% (27 of 35) of responding institutions and preoperative BMI cutoffs were used at 54% (19 of 35) of responding institutions. In the secret shopper portion of our study, we found that almost all the institutions (98% [49 of 50]) had a medical weight loss clinic, surgical weight loss clinic, or combined program. Regarding smoking cessation, 52% (26 of 50) referred patients to a specific department in their institution and 18% (9 of 50) referred to a state-run smoking cessation hotline. Thirty percent (15 of 50) did not offer any internal resource or external referral for smoking cessation. Regarding dental care, 48% (24 of 50) of institutions had a dental clinic that performed presurgical check-ups and 46% (23 of 50) did not offer any internal resource or external referral for dental care. In the secret shopper portion of our study, for institutions that had internal resources, we found that 86% (42 of 49) of weight loss clinics, 88% (23 of 26) of smoking cessation programs, and 58% (14 of 24) of dental clinics accepted Medicaid insurance. CONCLUSION: Proceeding with TJA may not be the best option for all patients; however, surgeons and patients should come to this consensus together after a thoughtful discussion of the risks and benefits for that particular patient. Future research should focus on how shared decision-making may influence patient satisfaction and a patient's ability to meet preoperative goals related to weight loss, glycemic control, smoking cessation, and dental care. Decision analyses or time trade-off analyses could be implemented in these studies to assess patients' tolerance for risk. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Orthopaedic surgeons should engage in shared decision-making with patients to develop realistic goals for weight loss, glycemic control, smoking cessation, and dental care that consider patient access to these services as well as the difficulties patients experience in losing weight, controlling blood glucose, and stopping smoking.

Establishing Sustainable Arthroscopy Capacity in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) through High-Income Country/LMIC Partnerships: A Qualitative Analysis.

Disparities exist in treatment modalities, including arthroscopic surgery, for orthopaedic injuries between high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Arthroscopy training is a self-identified goal of LMIC surgeons to meet the burden of musculoskeletal injury. The aim of this study was to determine the necessary "key ingredients" for establishing arthroscopy centers in LMICs in order to build capacity and expand training in arthroscopy in lower-resource settings. Methods: This study utilized semi-structured interviews with orthopaedic surgeons from both HICs and LMICs who had prior experience establishing arthroscopy efforts in LMICs. Participants were recruited via referral sampling. Interviews were qualitatively analyzed in duplicate via a coding schema based on repeated themes from preliminary interview review. Subgroup analysis was conducted between HIC and LMIC respondents. Results: We identified perspectives shared between HIC and LMIC stakeholders and perspectives unique to 1 group. Both groups were motivated by opportunities to improve patients' lives; the LMIC respondents were also motivated by access to skills and equipment, and the HIC respondents were motivated by teaching opportunities. Key ingredients identified by both groups included an emphasis on teaching and the need for high-cost equipment, such as arthroscopy towers. The LMIC respondents reported single-use materials as a key ingredient, while the HIC respondents reported local champions as crucial. The LMIC respondents cited the scarcity of implants and shaver blades as a barrier to the continuity of arthroscopy efforts. Conclusions: Incorporation of the identified key ingredients, along with leveraging the motivations of the host and the visiting participant, will allow future international arthroscopy partnerships to better match proposed interventions with the host-identified needs. Clinical Relevance: Arthroscopy is an important tool for treatment of musculoskeletal injury. Increasing access to arthroscopy is an important goal to achieve greater equity in musculoskeletal care globally. Developing successful partnerships between HICs and LMICs to support arthroscopic surgery requires sustained relationships that address local needs.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of prosthesis provision for patients with transfemoral amputation in Tanzania.

BACKGROUND: Limb loss leads to significant disability. Prostheses may mitigate this disability but are not readily accessible in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Cost-effectiveness data related to prosthesis provision in resource-constrained environments such as Tanzania is greatly limited. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of a prosthesis intervention compared with that of no prosthesis for persons with transfemoral amputations in an LMIC. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients were prospectively followed up. Clinical improvement with prosthesis provision was measured using EuroQuol-5D, represented as quality-adjusted life years gained. Direct and indirect costs were measured. The primary outcome was incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year, measured at 1 year and projected over a lifetime using a Markov model. Reference case was set as a single prosthesis provided without replacement from a payer perspective. Additional scenarios included the societal perspective and replacement of the prosthesis. Uncertainty was measured with one-way probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: From the payer perspective, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $242 for those without prosthetic replacement over a lifetime, and the ICER was $390 for those with prosthetic replacement over a lifeime. From the societal perspective, prosthesis provision was both less expensive and more effective. One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated the ICER remained below the willingness to pay threshold up to prosthesis costs of $763. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest prosthesis provision in an LMIC may be cost-effective, but further studies with long-term follow up are needed to validate the results.

Evaluating musculoskeletal urgent care center triage and transfer of emergency conditions for emergency surgical assessment and intervention.

Musculoskeletal urgent care centers (MUCCs) are an alternative to emergency departments (EDs) for patients to seek care for low acuity orthopedic injuries such as ankle sprains or joint pain, but are not equipped to manage orthopedic emergencies that require a higher level of care provided in the ED. This study aims to evaluate telephone and online triage practices as well as ED transfer procedures for MUCCs for patients presenting with an orthopedic condition requiring urgent surgical intervention. We called 595 MUCCs using a standardized script presenting as a critical patient with symptoms of lower extremity compartment syndrome. We compared direct ED referral frequency and triage frequency for MUCCs for patients insured by either Medicaid or by private insurance. We found that patients presenting with an apparent compartment syndrome were directly referred to the ED by < 1 in 5 MUCCs. Additionally, < 5% of patients were asked additional triage questions that would increase clinician suspicion for compartment syndrome and allow MUCCs to appropriately direct patients to the ED. MUCCs provide limited telephone and online triage for patients, which may result in delays of care for life or limb threatening injuries that require ED resources such as sedation, reductions, and emergency surgery. However, when MUCCs did conduct triage, it significantly increased the likelihood that patients were appropriately referred to the ED. Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study.

Assessment of clinical and radiographic outcomes following retrograde versus antegrade nailing of infraisthmic femoral shaft fractures without the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy in Tanzania.

To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes following antegrade versus retrograde intramedullary nailing of infraisthmic femoral shaft fractures. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary hospital in Tanzania. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients with infraisthmic diaphyseal femur fractures. INTERVENTION: Antegrade or retrograde SIGN intramedullary nail. OUTCOMES: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL), radiographic healing, knee range of motion, pain, and alignment (defined as less than or equal to 5 degrees of angular deformity in both coronal and sagittal planes) assessed at 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Of 160 included patients, 141 (88.1%) had 1-year follow-up and were included in analyses: 42 (29.8%) antegrade, 99 (70.2%) retrograde. Antegrade-nailed patients had more loss of coronal alignment (P = .026), but less knee pain at 6 months (P = .017) and increased knee flexion at 6 weeks (P = .021). There were no significant differences in reoperations, HRQOL, hip pain, knee extension, radiographic healing, or sagittal alignment. CONCLUSIONS: Antegrade nailing of infraisthmic femur fractures had higher incidence of alignment loss, but no detectable differences in HRQOL, pain, radiographic healing, or reoperation. Retrograde nailing was associated with increased knee pain and decreased knee range of motion at early time points, but this dissipated by 1 year. To our knowledge, this is the first study to prospectively compare outcomes over 1 year in patients treated with antegrade versus retrograde SIGN intramedullary nailing of infraisthmic femur fractures.Level of Evidence: III.

Intramedullary nailing versus external fixation for open tibia fractures in Tanzania: a cost analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Open tibia fractures pose a clinical and economic burden that is disproportionately borne by low-income countries. A randomized trial conducted by our group showed no difference in infection and nonunion comparing 2 treatments: external fixation (EF) and intramedullary nailing (IMN). Secondary outcomes favored IMN. In the absence of clear clinical superiority, we sought to compare costs between EF and IMN. DESIGN: Secondary cost analysis. SETTING: Single institution in Tanzania. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients with acute diaphyseal open tibia fractures who participated in a previous randomized controlled trial. INTERVENTION: SIGN IMN versus monoplanar EF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Direct costs of initial surgery and hospitalization and subsequent reoperation: implant, instrumentation, medications, disposable supplies, and personnel costs.Indirect costs from lost productivity of patient and caregiver.Societal (total) costs: sum of direct and indirect costs.All costs were reported in 2018 USD. RESULTS: Two hundred eighteen patients were included (110 IMN, 108 EF). From a payer perspective, costs were $365.83 (95% CI: $332.75-405.76) for IMN compared with $331.25 ($301.01-363.14) for EF, whereas from a societal perspective, costs were $2664.59 ($1711.22-3955.25) for IMN and $2560.81 ($1700.54-3715.09) for EF. The largest drivers of cost were reoperation and lost productivity. Accounting for uncertainty in multiple variables, probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that EF was less costly than IMN from the societal perspective in only 55% of simulations. CONCLUSIONS: Intramedullary nail fixation compared with external fixation of open tibia fractures in a resource-constrained setting is not associated with increased cost from a societal perspective.

The Initial Economic Burden of Femur Fractures on Informal Caregivers in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Background: Femur fracture patients require significant in-hospital care. The burden incurred by caregivers of such patients amplifies the direct costs of these injuries and remains unquantified. Aim: Here we aim to establish the in-hospital economic burden faced by informal caregivers of femur fracture patients. Methods: 70 unique caregivers for 46 femoral shaft fracture patients were interviewed. Incurred economic burden was determined by the Human Capital Approach, using standardized income data to quantify productivity loss (in $USD). Linear regression assessed the relationship between caregiver burden and patient time-in-hospital. Results: The average economic burden incurred was $149, 9% of a caregiver's annual income and positively correlated with patient time in hospital (p<0.01). Conclusion: Caregivers of patients treated operatively for femur fractures lost a large portion of their annual income, and this loss increased with patient time in hospital. These indirect costs of femur fracture treatment constitute an important component of the total injury burden.

Cost utility analysis of intramedullary nailing and skeletal traction treatment for patients with femoral shaft fractures in Malawi.

Background and purpose - In Malawi, both skeletal traction (ST) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) are used in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures, ST being the mainstay treatment. Previous studies have found that IMN has improved outcomes and is less expensive than ST. However, no cost-effectiveness analyses have yet compared IMN and ST in Malawi. We report the results of a cost-utility analysis (CUA) comparing treatment using either IMN or ST.Patients and methods - This was an economic evaluation study, where a CUA was done using a decision-tree model from the government healthcare payer and societal perspectives with an 1-year time horizon. We obtained EQ-5D-3L utility scores and probabilities from a prospective observational study assessing quality of life and function in 187 adult patients with femoral shaft fractures treated with either IMN or ST. The patients were followed up at 6 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months post-injury. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated from utility scores using the area under the curve method. Direct treatment costs were obtained from a prospective micro costing study. Indirect costs included patient lost productivity, patient transportation, meals, and childcare costs associated with hospital stay and follow-up visits. Multiple sensitivity analyses assessed model uncertainty.Results - Total treatment costs were higher for ST ($1,349) compared with IMN ($1,122). QALYs were lower for ST than IMN, 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.76) and 0.77 (CI 0.71-0.82) respectively. Based on lower cost and higher utility, IMN was the dominant strategy. IMN remained dominant in 94% of simulations. IMN would be less cost-effective than ST at a total procedure cost exceeding $880 from the payer's perspective, or $1,035 from the societal perspective.Interpretation - IMN was cost saving and more effective than ST in the treatment of adult femoral shaft fractures in Malawi, and may be an efficient use of limited healthcare resources.

Cost Analyses of Prosthetic Devices: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To synthesize extant literature on the cost-effectiveness of prosthetic interventions and explore applicability to low- and middle-income country (LMIC) settings. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature review using subject headings including "prosthetics," "amputation," and "cost analysis" was performed with PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science search engines, yielding 1194 articles. An additional 22 articles were identified via backward citation searching for 1144 total after duplicate removal. The search was last run in May of 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they conducted an economic analysis of an upper or lower extremity prosthetic device. Studies were excluded if (1) full text was unavailable in English; (2) study was a systematic review or meta-analysis; or (3) study did not have a prosthetic comparison group. Using DistillerSR software, 2 authors independently conducted title and abstract screening. One author conducted full-text screening. The proportion of initially identified studies that met final inclusion criteria was 1% (12 of 1144). DATA EXTRACTION: Data were dually extracted by 2 authors and reviewed by 3 additional authors. DATA SYNTHESIS: All included studies (N=12) examined lower extremity amputations comparing advanced technology. No studies were conducted in LMICs. Comparable data between studies demonstrated (1) the cost-effectiveness of microprocessor- over nonmicroprocessor-controlled knees for transfemoral amputation in high-income settings; (2) equivocal findings regarding osseointegrated vs socket-suspended prostheses; and (3) increased cost for ICEX and modular socket systems over patellar tendon-bearing socket systems with no functional improvement. CONCLUSIONS: There are few prosthetic cost analyses in the literature. Additional analyses are needed to determine the direct and indirect costs associated with prosthetic acquisition, fitting, and maintenance; the costs of amputee rehabilitation; and long-term economic and quality-of-life benefits. Such studies may guide future prosthetic and rehabilitative care, especially in resource-austere settings where prosthetic needs are greatest.