Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(10): e2022927, 2020 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33119107

RESUMO

Importance: Children with birth defects have a greater risk of developing cancer, but this association has not yet been evaluated in children conceived with in vitro fertilization (IVF). Objective: To assess whether the association between birth defects and cancer is greater in children conceived via IVF compared with children conceived naturally. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study of live births, birth defects, and cancer from Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, and Texas included 1 000 639 children born to fertile women and 52 776 children conceived via IVF (using autologous oocytes and fresh embryos) during 2004-2016 in Massachusetts and North Carolina, 2004-2015 in New York, and 2004-2013 in Texas. Children were followed up for an average of 5.7 years (6 008 985 total person-years of exposure). Data analysis was conducted from April 1 to August 31, 2020. Exposures: Conception by IVF for state residents who gave birth to liveborn singletons during the study period. Birth defect diagnoses recorded by statewide registries. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cancer diagnosis as recorded by state cancer registries. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for birth defect-cancer associations separately in fertile and IVF groups. Results: A total of 1 000 639 children (51.3% boys; 69.7% White; and 38.3% born between 2009-2012) were in the fertile group and 52 776 were in the IVF group (51.3% boys; 81.3% White; and 39.6% born between 2009-2012). Compared with children without birth defects, cancer risks were higher among children with a major birth defect in the fertile group (hazard ratio [HR], 3.15; 95% CI, 2.40-4.14) and IVF group (HR, 6.90; 95% CI, 3.73-12.74). The HR of cancer among children with a major nonchromosomal defect was 2.07 (95% CI, 1.47-2.91) among children in the fertile group and 4.04 (95% CI, 1.86-8.77) among children in the IVF group. The HR of cancer among children with a chromosomal defect was 15.45 (95% CI, 10.00-23.86) in the fertile group and 38.91 (95% CI, 15.56-97.33) in the IVF group. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that among children with birth defects, those conceived via IVF were at greater risk of developing cancer compared with children conceived naturally.


Assuntos
Anormalidades Congênitas/diagnóstico , Fertilização in vitro/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Medição de Risco/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Anormalidades Congênitas/epidemiologia , Feminino , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Fertilização in vitro/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , New York/epidemiologia , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População/métodos , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Texas/epidemiologia
3.
Fertil Steril ; 113(6): 1242-1250.e4, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32409098

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if there are differences in standardized testing results at the end of third grade between children conceived with the use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and those conceived spontaneously. DESIGN: Retrospective population-based cohort. SETTING: Texas public school system. PATIENT(S): Singleton and twin children 8-9 years of age who took the third-grade public school standardized testing in Texas from 2012 to 2018. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Standardized testing in reading and mathematics. RESULT(S): After exclusions, there were 6,970 IVF and 12,690 non-IVF children with reading scores and 6,973 IVF and 12,729 non-IVF children with mathematics scores. IVF children scored significantly higher in reading (singletons: 1,543 ± 2 vs. 1,525 ± 1; twins: 1,534 ± 2 vs. 1,504 ± 5 [mean ± SE]), and mathematics (singletons: 1,566 ± 2 vs. 1,550 ± 1; twins: 1,557 ± 2 vs. 1,529 ± 5). Children of mothers ≥30 years of age scored consistently higher than children of mothers 18-29 years of age. The differences were of similar magnitude between IVF and control children for older ages, but not significant for IVF. Within the IVF group, there were no significant differences between children born from fresh versus froze-thawed embryos. CONCLUSION(S): Children of ages 8-9 years who were conceived with the use of IVF performed as well on third-grade reading and math assessments as their counterparts who were conceived spontaneously. We also found consistent racial and ethnic differences, gender differences, and beneficial effects of older maternal age. Because we were not able to adjust adequately for socioeconomic status and other confounding factors, which may explain some of the observed differences, we conclude that there is no negative effect of IVF conception on academic achievement in third grade.


Assuntos
Sucesso Acadêmico , Desenvolvimento Infantil , Fertilização in vitro , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Criança , Bases de Dados Factuais , Avaliação Educacional , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Idade Materna , Conceitos Matemáticos , Gravidez , Gravidez de Gêmeos , Fatores Raciais , Leitura , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Texas , Adulto Jovem
4.
Fertil Steril ; 110(6): 1081-1088.e1, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30396552

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the attitudes of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) members regarding expanding insurance coverage for patients seeking assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and identify some of the factors that may influence such attitudes. DESIGN: An anonymous online 14-question survey of SART membership; 1,556 surveys were sent through the SART Research Portal from June to December 2017. Questions were incremental in scope, beginning with expanding insurance coverage for ART for vulnerable populations (e.g., fertility preservation for cancer, couples with same recessive gene, fertility preservation for transgender individuals) to extending coverage to include patients who were uninsured for ART. Additional questions assessed attitudes about assuming some fiscal responsibility if mandated insurance were contingent on elective single-embryo transfer (eSET) and lower charges in anticipation of increased number of cases. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Not applicable. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Specific response to 14 survey questions. RESULT(S): The overall response rate was 43.4% (675/1,556). A large majority (>95%) favored insurance for fertility preservation for cancer patients and for avoidance of genetic disorders; 62.3% were supportive of infertility insurance coverage for transgender patients; 78% supported expanding insurance for the broadest segment of the general uninsured population; 76.7% supported expanding insurance contingent on eSET; and 51.3% would consider expanding insurance contingent on lowering charge per cycle in general, but only 23% responded as to what lower charge would be acceptable. Three of four factors were shown by multivariable logistic regression to be predictive of attitudes willing to expand insurance: practice setting (academic > hybrid > private), practicing in a mandated state, and higher annual volume of cases (>500 cycles); these had significant increased adjusted odds ratios ranging from 1.7 to 2.9. A fourth factor, the professional role one had in the practice, was not found to be of significant predictive value. CONCLUSION(S): The great majority of respondents were supportive of expanding insurance for specific segments of vulnerable populations with special needs and for the population who are presently uninsured. Furthermore, the majority of respondents would consider expanding insurance coverage contingent on age-appropriate eSET but have concerns about reduced reimbursement. Those most likely to be willing to expand insurance are those who practice in an academic setting or a mandated state and/or have a high annual volume of cases.


Assuntos
Cobertura do Seguro/tendências , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/tendências , Sociedades Médicas/tendências , Inquéritos e Questionários , Feminino , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Masculino , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/economia , Sociedades Médicas/economia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
Ir J Med Sci ; 187(4): 947-951, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29450691

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: A study in 2011 by (Doody et al. Ir Med J 106(10):300-302, 2013) looked at comparing inpatient adverse events recorded prospectively at the point of care, with adverse events recorded by the national Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE) System. METHODS: In the study, a single-centre University Hospital in Ireland treating acute hip fractures in an orthopaedic unit recorded 39 patients over a 2-month (August-September 2011) period, with 55 adverse events recorded prospectively in contrast to the HIPE record of 13 (23.6%) adverse events. With the recent change in the Irish hospital funding model from block grant to an 'activity-based funding' on the basis of case load and case complexity, the hospital financial allocation is dependent on accurate case complexity coding. A retrospective assessment of the financial implications of the two methods of adverse incident recording was carried out. RESULTS: A total of €39,899 in 'missed funding' for 2 months was calculated when the ward-based, prospectively collected data was compared to the national HIPE data. Accurate data collection is paramount in facilitating activity-based funding, to improve patient care and ensure the appropriate allocation of resources.


Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais/economia , Fraturas do Quadril/economia , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA