RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome is a symptom complex affecting 12-14% of the UK adult female population. Symptoms include urinary urgency, with or without urgency incontinence, increased daytime urinary frequency and nocturia. OAB has a negative impact on women's social, physical, and psychological wellbeing. Initial treatment includes lifestyle modifications, bladder retraining, pelvic floor exercises and pharmacological therapy. However, these measures are unsuccessful in 25-40% of women (refractory OAB). Before considering invasive treatments, such as Botulinum toxin injection or sacral neuromodulation, most guidelines recommend urodynamics to confirm diagnosis of detrusor overactivity (DO). However, urodynamics may fail to show evidence of DO in up to 45% of cases, hence the need to evaluate its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. FUTURE (Female Urgency, Trial of Urodynamics as Routine Evaluation) aims to test the hypothesis that, in women with refractory OAB, urodynamics and comprehensive clinical assessment is associated with superior patient-reported outcomes following treatment and is more cost-effective, compared to comprehensive clinical assessment only. METHODS: FUTURE is a pragmatic, multi-centre, superiority randomised controlled trial. Women aged ≥ 18 years with refractory OAB or urgency predominant mixed urinary incontinence, and who have failed/not tolerated conservative and medical treatment, are considered for trial entry. We aim to recruit 1096 women from approximately 60 secondary/tertiary care hospitals across the UK. All consenting women will complete questionnaires at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 15 months post-randomisation. The primary outcome is participant-reported success at 15 months post-randomisation measured using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement. The primary economic outcome is incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained at 15 months. The secondary outcomes include adverse events, impact on other urinary symptoms and health-related quality of life. Qualitative interviews with participants and clinicians and a health economic evaluation will also be conducted. The statistical analysis of the primary outcome will be by intention-to-treat. Results will be presented as estimates and 95% CIs. DISCUSSION: The FUTURE study will inform patients, clinicians and policy makers whether routine urodynamics improves treatment outcomes in women with refractory OAB and whether it is cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN63268739 . Registered on 14 September 2017.
Assuntos
Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa , Urodinâmica , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/diagnóstico , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/terapia , Incontinência Urinária de Urgência/diagnóstico , Incontinência Urinária de Urgência/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) comprise storage symptoms, voiding symptoms and post-voiding symptoms. Prevalence and severity of LUTS increase with age and the progressive increase in the aged population group has emphasised the importance to our society of appropriate and effective management of male LUTS. Identification of causal mechanisms is needed to optimise treatment and uroflowmetry is the simplest non-invasive test of voiding function. Invasive urodynamics can evaluate storage function and voiding function; however, there is currently insufficient evidence to support urodynamics becoming part of routine practice in the clinical evaluation of male LUTS. DESIGN: A 2-arm trial, set in urology departments of at least 26 National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in the United Kingdom (UK), randomising men with bothersome LUTS for whom surgeons would consider offering surgery, between a care pathway based on urodynamic tests with invasive multichannel cystometry and a care pathway based on non-invasive routine tests. The aim of the trial is to determine whether a care pathway not including invasive urodynamics is no worse for men in terms of symptom outcome than one in which it is included, at 18 months after randomisation. This primary clinical outcome will be measured with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). We will also establish whether inclusion of invasive urodynamics reduces rates of bladder outlet surgery as a main secondary outcome. DISCUSSION: The general population has an increased life-expectancy and, as men get older, their prostates enlarge and potentially cause benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) which often requires surgery. Furthermore, voiding symptoms become increasingly prevalent, some of which may not be due to BPO. Therefore, as the population ages, more operations will be considered to relieve BPO, some of which may not actually be appropriate. Hence, there is sustained interest in the diagnostic pathway and this trial could improve the chances of an accurate diagnosis and reduce overall numbers of surgical interventions for BPO in the NHS. The morbidity, and therapy costs, of testing must be weighed against the cost saving of surgery reduction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-trials.com - ISRCTN56164274 (confirmed registration: 8 April 2014).
Assuntos
Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/diagnóstico , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico , Urodinâmica , Protocolos Clínicos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/fisiopatologia , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/cirurgia , Masculino , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Prostatectomia , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Hiperplasia Prostática/fisiopatologia , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Reino Unido , Procedimentos Desnecessários , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/etiologia , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/fisiopatologia , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgiaRESUMO
The bladder is vulnerable to the adverse effects of drugs because of its complex control and the frequent excretion of drug metabolites in the urine. Incontinence results when bladder pressure exceeds sphincter resistance. Stress incontinence because of sphincter weakness occurs with antipsychotics and alpha-blockers, especially in women. Urge incontinence and irritative symptoms may be caused by drugs. Anticholinergics, anaesthetics and analgesics cause urinary retention because of failure of bladder contraction. They are more likely to cause retention in men because of prostatic enlargement. Cyclophosphamide and tiaprofenic acid can cause chemical cystitis, and should be withdrawn if a patient develops irritative symptoms or haematuria. Cyclophosphamide may also induce bladder tumours. Adverse effects of cyclophosphamide can be reduced with prophylactic administration of mesna and adequate hydration. Mitomycin, doxorubicin or bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) instilled locally to treat bladder tumours can cause cystitis, contracture and calcification. Their administration should be limited to 1 hour per week for a maximum of 8 weeks. Retroperitoneal fibrosis and urine discolouration may be caused by drugs. Ureteric calculi may result from any drug causing nephrolithiasis.