Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(4): e238592, 2023 04 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37067802

RESUMO

This cross-sectional study assesses the prevalence of conflicts of interest (COI) associated with guideline-recommended drugs among Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline authors and compliance with the Council on Medical Specialty Societies and Institute of Medicine guidelines.


Assuntos
Conflito de Interesses , Medicina , Humanos , Indústria Farmacêutica
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 48(11): 1322-1328, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32437753

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prior to implementing an antibiotic stewardship intervention for asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB), we assessed institutional barriers to change using the Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment. METHODS: Surveys were self-administered on paper in inpatient medicine and long-term care units at 4 Veterans Affairs facilities. Participants included providers, nurses, and pharmacists. The survey included 7 subscales: evidence (perceived strength of evidence) and six context subscales (favorability of organizational context). Responses were scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale. RESULTS: One hundred four surveys were completed (response rate = 69.3%). Overall, the evidence subscale had the highest score; the resources subscale (mean 2.8) was significantly lower than other subscales (P < .001). Scores for budget and staffing resources were lower than scores for training and facility resources (P < .001 for both). Pharmacists had lower scores than providers for the staff culture subscale (P = .04). The site with the lowest scores for resources (mean 2.4) also had lower scores for leadership and lower pharmacist effort devoted to stewardship. CONCLUSIONS: Although healthcare professionals endorsed the evidence about nontreatment of ASB, perceived barriers to antibiotic stewardship included inadequate resources and leadership support. These findings provide targets for tailoring the stewardship intervention to maximize success.


Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Bacteriúria , Bacteriúria/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Liderança , Assistência de Longa Duração , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Value Health ; 21(3): 310-317, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29566838

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine the optimal antibiotic prophylaxis strategy for transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB) as a function of the local antibiotic resistance profile. METHODS: We developed a decision-analytic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of four antibiotic prophylaxis strategies: ciprofloxacin alone, ceftriaxone alone, ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone in combination, and directed prophylaxis selection based on susceptibility testing. We used a payer's perspective and estimated the health care costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) associated with each strategy for a cohort of 66-year-old men undergoing TRPB. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3% annually. Base-case resistance prevalence was 29% to ciprofloxacin and 7% to ceftriaxone, reflecting susceptibility patterns observed at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Resistance levels were varied in sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: In the base case, single-agent prophylaxis strategies were dominated. Directed prophylaxis strategy was the optimal strategy at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY gained. Relative to the directed prophylaxis strategy, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the combination strategy was $123,333/QALY gained over the lifetime time horizon. In sensitivity analysis, single-agent prophylaxis strategies were preferred only at extreme levels of resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Directed or combination prophylaxis strategies were optimal for a wide range of resistance levels. Facilities using single-agent antibiotic prophylaxis strategies before TRPB should re-evaluate their strategies unless extremely low levels of antimicrobial resistance are documented.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/economia , Antibioticoprofilaxia/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos/efeitos dos fármacos , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/economia , Idoso , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Biópsia/economia , Biópsia/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos/fisiologia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Próstata/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico
4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 36(2): 142-52, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25632996

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effect of outpatient antimicrobial stewardship programs on prescribing, patient, microbial outcomes, and costs. DESIGN: Systematic review METHODS: Search of MEDLINE (2000 through November 2013), Cochrane Library, and reference lists of relevant studies. We included English language studies with patient populations relevant to the United States (eg, infectious conditions, prescription services) evaluating stewardship programs in outpatient settings and reporting outcomes of interest. Data regarding study characteristics and outcomes were extracted and organized by intervention type. RESULTS: We identified 50 studies eligible for inclusion, with most (29 of 50; 58%) reporting on respiratory tract infections, followed by multiple/unspecified infections (17 of 50; 34%). We found medium-strength evidence that stewardship programs incorporating communication skills training and laboratory testing are associated with reductions in antimicrobial use, and low-strength evidence that other stewardship interventions are associated with improved prescribing. Patient-centered outcomes, which were infrequently reported, were not adversely affected. Medication costs were generally lower with stewardship interventions, but overall program costs were rarely reported. No studies reported microbial outcomes, and data regarding outpatient settings other than primary care clinics are limited. CONCLUSIONS: Low- to moderate-strength evidence suggests that antimicrobial stewardship programs in outpatient settings improve antimicrobial prescribing without adversely effecting patient outcomes. Effectiveness depends on program type. Most studies were not designed to measure patient or resistance outcomes. Data regarding sustainability and scalability of interventions are limited.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica , Tomada de Decisões Assistida por Computador , Custos de Medicamentos , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Educação Médica Continuada , Retroalimentação , Humanos , Política Organizacional , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Relações Médico-Paciente , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
5.
J Comp Eff Res ; 3(5): 547-57, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25350805

RESUMO

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has increased in incidence and severity, and is now among the most common nosocomial infections. Several agents are available for the initial treatment of CDI, some of which are rarely used, and none of which is clearly superior for initial clinical cure. Fidaxomicin appears to offer a benefit in terms of preventing recurrent disease, although the cost-benefit ratio is debated. Recurrent CDI is a major challenge, occurring after 15-30% of initial episodes. The treatment of recurrent CDI is difficult, with sparse evidence available to support any particular agent. Fecal microbiota therapy, also known as 'stool transplantation', appears to be highly effective, although availability is currently limited, and the regulatory environment is in flux. Synthetic stool products and an orally available fecal microbiota therapy product are both under investigation, which may address the problem of availability. As with most infectious diseases, an effective vaccine would be a welcome addition to our armamentarium, but none is currently available.


Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Antibacterianos/economia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Clostridium/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Clostridium/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/terapia , Fezes/microbiologia , Humanos , Microbiota , Vacinação/métodos
7.
JAMA Intern Med ; 173(1): 62-8, 2013 Jan 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23212273

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lengthier antimicrobial therapy is associated with increased costs, antimicrobial resistance, and adverse drug events. Therefore, establishing minimum effective antimicrobial treatment durations is an important public health goal. The optimal treatment duration and current treatment patterns for urinary tract infection (UTI) in men are unknown. We used Veterans Affairs administrative data to study male UTI treatment and outcomes. METHODS: Male UTI episodes in the Veterans Affairs system (fiscal year 2009) were identified by combining International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes with UTI-relevant antimicrobial prescriptions. Episodes were categorized as index, early recurrence (<30 days), or late recurrence (≥30 days) cases. Drug name, treatment duration, and outcomes (recurrence and Clostridium difficile infection during 12 months) were recorded for index cases. Demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics were assessed for associations with outcomes in univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Among 4 854 765 outpatient male veterans, 39 149 UTI episodes involving 33 336 unique patients were identified, including 33 336 index cases (85.2%), 1772 early recurrences (4.5%), and 4041 late recurrences (10.3%). Highest-use antimicrobial agents were ciprofloxacin (62.7%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (26.8%); 35.0% of patients received shorter-duration treatment (≤7 days), and 65.0% of patients received longer-duration treatment (>7 days). Of the index cases, 4.1% were followed by early recurrence and 9.9% by late recurrence. Longer-duration treatment was not associated with a reduction in early or late recurrence but was associated with increased late recurrence compared with shorter-duration treatment (10.8% vs 8.4%, P < .001), including in multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.10-1.30). In addition, C difficile infection risk was significantly higher with longer-duration vs shorter-duration treatment (0.5% vs 0.3%, P = .02) and exhibited a similar suggestive trend in multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.97-2.07). CONCLUSION: Longer-duration treatment (>7 days) for male UTI in the outpatient setting was associated with no reduction in early or late recurrence.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Infecções por Clostridium , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso , Infecções Urinárias , Idoso , Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos/efeitos adversos , Ciprofloxacina/administração & dosagem , Ciprofloxacina/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Clostridium/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Esquema de Medicação , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Cuidado Periódico , Humanos , Masculino , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/normas , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Prevenção Secundária , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/administração & dosagem , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Veteranos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA