Computed tomography versus invasive coronary angiography: design and methods of the pragmatic randomised multicentre DISCHARGE trial.

OBJECTIVES: More than 3.5 million invasive coronary angiographies (ICA) are performed in Europe annually. Approximately 2 million of these invasive procedures might be reduced by noninvasive tests because no coronary intervention is performed. Computed tomography (CT) is the most accurate noninvasive test for detection and exclusion of coronary artery disease (CAD). To investigate the comparative effectiveness of CT and ICA, we designed the European pragmatic multicentre DISCHARGE trial funded by the 7th Framework Programme of the European Union (EC-GA 603266). METHODS: In this trial, patients with a low-to-intermediate pretest probability (10-60 %) of suspected CAD and a clinical indication for ICA because of stable chest pain will be randomised in a 1-to-1 ratio to CT or ICA. CT and ICA findings guide subsequent management decisions by the local heart teams according to current evidence and European guidelines. RESULTS: Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke as a composite endpoint will be the primary outcome measure. Secondary and other outcomes include cost-effectiveness, radiation exposure, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), socioeconomic status, lifestyle, adverse events related to CT/ICA, and gender differences. CONCLUSIONS: The DISCHARGE trial will assess the comparative effectiveness of CT and ICA. KEY POINTS: • Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. • Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the reference standard for detection of CAD. • Noninvasive computed tomography angiography excludes CAD with high sensitivity. • CT may effectively reduce the approximately 2 million negative ICAs in Europe. • DISCHARGE addresses this hypothesis in patients with low-to-intermediate pretest probability for CAD.

Semi-automatic assessment of global left ventricular function and left ventricular parameters with dual-source computed tomography: comparison with invasive angiography.

This study assesses the global left ventricular function and volumes using dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) with improved temporal resolution (83 ms) by use of a semi-automatic software tool in comparison to invasive angiography (IVA). One hundred patients scheduled for invasive coronary angiography because of suspected or known coronary artery disease (80 men; 20 women, mean age 62 +/- 10 years) were additionally examined by DSCT. Global left ventricular function (LVF), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), end-systolic volume (LVESV), and stroke volume (SV) were calculated by the use of semi-automatic post-processing software and results compared with those of IVA. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a good concordance between DSCT and IVA in terms of LVF: Pearson's r 0.78, confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.86, P < 0.0001, bias 7.1% +/- 9.1%. The same was true for LVESV (Pearson's r 0.78, CI 0.67-0.85, P < 0.0001, bias 15.0 +/- 21.0 ml), whereas the agreement for LVEDV and SV was only moderate (LVEDV: Pearson's r 0.59, CI 0.43-0.72, P < 0.0001, bias 13.0 +/- 18.1 ml; SV: Pearson's r 0.47, CI 0.28-0.62, P < 0.0001, bias -1.4 +/- 28.4 ml). Semi-automatic evaluation of left ventricular parameters with DSCT revealed good correlation for LVF and LVESV, whereas LVEDV and SV showed only a moderate correlation. Moreover, LVF is systematically underestimated by DSCT.

Coronary artery bypass grafts: assessment of graft patency and native coronary artery lesions using 16-slice MDCT.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of electrocardiography (ECG)-gated 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in detection of stenosis of bypass grafts and native coronary arteries in patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). ECG-gated contrast-enhanced MDCT using 12 x 0.75-mm collimation was performed in 20 patients with recurrent angina 4.75 years after undergoing CABG. A total of 50 grafts, 16 arterial and 34 venous, were examined. All graft and coronary segments were evaluated for stenosis in comparison with conventional coronary angiography (CCA). Among the 80 arterial graft segments, 62 could be assessed (77.5%). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for stenosis were 96.2%, 97.2%, 96.2%, and 97.2%, respectively. In a total of 180 venous graft segments, 167 could be assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for stenosis were 98.5%, 93.9%, 91.8%, and 98.9%, respectively. MDCT could assess 179 of 260 native coronary artery segments (68.8%). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for stenosis were 92.1%, 76.9%, 87.5%, and 84.7%, respectively. Sixteen-slice MDCT provides excellent image quality and diagnostic accuracy in detection of graft and coronary artery lesions in patients with suspected graft dysfunction.