Unsedated transnasal EGD: an alternative approach to conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy for documenting Helicobacter pylori eradication.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the yield of antral biopsies performed via unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy, a technique that does not require conscious sedation with its concomitant costs and complications, for documentation of Helicobacter pylori eradication. METHODS: Nineteen patients who were previously CLO test positive on conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy and subsequently treated for H pylori infection were enrolled. The subjects had not received antibiotic therapy in the prior month and had no prior gastric surgery. By using a GIF-N30 fiberoptic endoscope and a tiny cup biopsy forceps (1.8 mm diameter), unsedated transnasal endoscopy was performed and antral biopsy specimens were taken for a CLO test, histologic analysis (Dieterle stain), and tissue culture. On the same day, the subjects underwent a carbon 13-labeled area urea breath test. All subjects completed a visual analog scale, rating the acceptability of the unsedated transnasal examination and the previous sedated conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the results of the CLO tests (5/19 positive) versus the 13C-urea breath test (4/19 positive) (p = 0.96), the CLO tests versus histologic findings (5/19 positive) (p = 0.71), or the 13C-urea breath test versus histologic findings (p = 0.96). All tissue culture results were negative. The overall acceptability of unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy was similar to that of sedated conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy. CONCLUSION: Unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy, a technique that eliminates the costs and complications associated with conscious sedation, is a feasible and accurate alternative to conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy when documentation of H pylori eradication and confirmation of gastric ulcer healing are both indicated.

A comparative study of unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy and conventional EGD.

BACKGROUND: A significant portion of the cost and complications associated with conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is attributed to conscious intravenous sedation, which usually results in loss of work on the day of the endoscopy. Earlier studies have described the feasibility and safety of unsedated transnasal EGD in normal volunteers. METHODS: We compared the diagnostic yield and patient acceptability of this new technique performed first, with conventional EGD performed second in 24 outpatients. RESULTS: The sensitivity of transnasal EGD was 89% and its specificity was 97%. Transnasal EGD was more acceptable and less stressful to the patients than conventional EGD (p < 0.05). Oxygen saturation and blood pressure did not change during transnasal EGD. CONCLUSION: Transnasal EGD is feasible, safe, and well tolerated by patients. Specificity of transnasal EGD is similar to, but its sensitivity is lower than, conventional EGD. By eliminating the need for sedation-related work loss and postprocedural monitoring, transnasal EGD potentially is more cost-effective than conventional EGD.

A simple method of assessment of gestational age in newborn infants.

A simple method of assessment of gestational age based on only four characteristics, namely, the anterior vascular capsule of the lens, plantar creases, breast nodule, and ear firmness, is presented. Critical evaluation by appropriate statistical analyses has shown this to be a useful method of practical value with 95% confidence limits of 11 days. It is applicable to newborn infants, including sick babies, at any time within the first 2 days of life.