Hepatic-associated vascular morphological assessment to predict overt hepatic encephalopathy before TIPS: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: To provide patients the chance of accepting curative transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) rather than palliative treatments for portal hypertension-related variceal bleeding and ascites, we aimed to assess hepatic-associated vascular morphological change to improve the predictive accuracy of overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) risks. METHODS: In this multicenter study, 621 patients undergoing TIPS were subdivided into training (413 cases from 3 hospitals) and external validation datasets (208 cases from another 3 hospitals). In addition to traditional clinical factors, we assessed hepatic-associated vascular morphological changes using maximum diameter (including absolute and ratio values). Three predictive models (clinical, hepatic-associated vascular, and combined) were constructed using logistic regression. Their discrimination and calibration were compared to test the necessity of hepatic-associated vascular assessment and identify the optimal model. Furthermore, to verify the improved performance of ModelC-V, we compared it with four previous models, both in discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: The combined model outperformed the clinical and hepatic-associated vascular models (training: 0.814, 0.754, 0.727; validation: 0.781, 0.679, 0.776; p < 0.050) and had the best calibration. Compared to previous models, ModelC-V showed superior performance in discrimination. The high-, middle-, and low-risk populations displayed significantly different overt HE incidence (p < 0.001). Despite the limited ability of pre-TIPS ammonia to predict overt HE risks, the combined model displayed a satisfactory ability to predict overt HE risks, both in the low- and high-ammonia subgroups. CONCLUSION: Hepatic-associated vascular assessment improved the predictive accuracy of overt HE, ensuring curative chances by TIPS for suitable patients and providing insights for cirrhosis-related studies.

3D automatic liver and spleen assessment in predicting overt hepatic encephalopathy before TIPS: a multi-center study.

BACKGROUND: Overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) should be predicted preoperatively to identify suitable candidates for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) instead of first-line treatment. This study aimed to construct a 3D assessment-based model to predict post-TIPS overt HE. METHODS: In this multi-center cohort study, 487 patients who underwent TIPS were subdivided into a training dataset (390 cases from three hospitals) and an external validation dataset (97 cases from another two hospitals). Candidate factors included clinical, vascular, and 2D and 3D data. Combining the least absolute shrinkage and operator method, support vector machine, and probability calibration by isotonic regression, we constructed four predictive models: clinical, 2D, 3D, and combined models. Their discrimination and calibration were compared to identify the optimal model, with subgroup analysis performed. RESULTS: The 3D model showed better discrimination than did the 2D model (training: 0.719 vs. 0.691; validation: 0.730 vs. 0.622). The model combining clinical and 3D factors outperformed the clinical and 3D models (training: 0.802 vs. 0.735 vs. 0.719; validation: 0.816 vs. 0.723 vs. 0.730; all p < 0.050). Moreover, the combined model had the best calibration. The performance of the best model was not affected by the total bilirubin level, Child-Pugh score, ammonia level, or the indication for TIPS. CONCLUSION: 3D assessment of the liver and the spleen provided additional information to predict overt HE, improving the chance of TIPS for suitable patients. 3D assessment could also be used in similar studies related to cirrhosis.

Disparities in economic burden for children with leukemia insured by resident basic medical insurance: evidence from real-world data 2015-2019 in Guangdong, China.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric leukemia is the most prevalent childhood cancer in China and incurs heavy economic burden to patients without sufficient insurance protection. Although all Chinese children are obliged to enroll in the national insurance scheme, "Resident Basic Medical Insurance (RBMI)", the protection may vary among patient subgroups. This study is designed to measure the disparities in economic burden for patients with leukemia under RBMI protection and explore the influencing factors. METHODS: The included patients were aged ≤ 15 and diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML, with/without transplantation). They all completed treatment course consecutively in Nanfang Hospital and Zhujiang Hospital from Jan.1, 2015, to Dec.30, 2019, in Guangzhou, China. Their inpatient treatment and insurance settlement data were drawn from the Hospital Information System (HIS) and Insurance Settlement System (ISS). A total of 765 consecutive patients and 14,477 inpatient medical records were included and analyzed. Their insurance status (6 subtypes), economic burden [total cost, out-of-pocket cost (OOP), reimbursement, reimbursement rate (RR)], and cost structures (operation/procedure, blood products, drug, simple treatment) were calculated respectively. Non-normally distributed costs were reported as the median and interquartile range (IQR). Wilcoxon test was used for univariate tests and generalized linear model with log link was used to explore the influencing factors. RESULTS: The insured patients who were treated in the location of insurance with instant reimbursement reported the highest total cost and reimbursement, while those who seek medical care cross-province with no instant reimbursement reported the lowest total cost and highest OOP payment. In terms of annual change, the total cost of children with leukemia decreased from 2015-2019 with stably increasing reimbursement rate. Blood products and drugs were the major components of total cost, but they decreased annually. Patients who received transplantation and treated across provinces were with a higher economic burden. CONCLUSION: The economic burden for children with leukemia decreased overtime under the protection of RBMI, but disparities exist among subtypes. The payer-provider contract on instant reimbursement and drug cost control are effective measures for insurance administrators to curb the economic burdens of pediatric leukemia treatment.

Effectiveness of Levoamlodipine Maleate for Hypertension Compared with Amlodipine Besylate: a Pragmatic Comparative Effectiveness Study.

PURPOSE: Antihypertensive treatment is the most important method to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients. However, there is scant evidence of the benefits of levoamlodipine maleate for antihypertensive treatment using a head-to-head comparison in the real-world. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of levoamlodipine maleate used to treat outpatients with primary hypertension compared with amlodipine besylate in a real-world setting. METHODS: This was a pragmatic comparative effectiveness study carried out at 110 centers across China in outpatients with primary hypertension treated with levoamlodipine maleate or amlodipine besylate, with 24 months of follow-up. The primary outcomes used for evaluating the effectiveness were composite major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), adverse reactions, and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: Among the included 10,031 patients, there were 482 MACCE, 223 (4.4%) in the levoamlodipine maleate group (n = 5018) and 259 (5.2%) in the amlodipine besylate group (n = 5013) (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.90, 95%CI: 0.75-1.08, P = 0.252). The levoamlodipine maleate group had lower overall incidences of any adverse reactions (6.0% vs. 8.4%, P < 0.001), lower extremity edema (1.1% vs. 3.0%, P < 0.001) and headache (0.7% vs. 1.1%, P = 0.045). There was a nearly 100% chance of the levoamlodipine maleate being cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of 150,000 Yuan per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, resulting in more QALYs (incremental QALYs: 0.00392) and cost savings (saving 2725 Yuan or 28.8% reduction in overall costs) per patient. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, levoamlodipine maleate could reduce cost by 29% with a similar MACCE incidence rate and lower occurrence of adverse reactions (especially edema and headache) compared with amlodipine besylate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01844570 registered at May 1, 2013.