Gender, BMI, Patient Comorbidities, and Hospital Characteristics Influence 30-Day Readmission Following Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy.

PURPOSE: Obesity impacts 300 million people worldwide and the number continues to increase. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of several bariatric procedures offered to help these individuals achieve a healthier life. Here, we report 30-day readmission rates and risk factors for readmission after gastrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the US Healthcare Utilization Project's Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) from 2016 to 2019 for patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy and evaluated 30-day readmission rates, comparing readmitted patients to non-readmitted patients. Confounder adjusted and unadjusted analysis were proceeded to the potential factors. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 235,563 patients, with a 3.0% readmission rate. Factors associated with a higher readmission rate included older age, male gender, higher BMI, Medicare as the primary payer, longer length of stay, higher total charge, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, higher Elixhauser-Comorbidity Index, lower household income, non-elective admission type, and non-routine disposition. Additionally, larger hospital bed size, and private, invest-own hospital ownership were associated with higher readmission rates. After adjusting for confounders, several comorbidities and complications were found to be significantly associated with readmission, including ileus, abnormal weight loss, postprocedural complications of digestive system, acute posthemorrhagic anemia, and history of pulmonary embolism (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patient characteristics including age, BMI, and payment source, as well as hospital characteristics, can impact the 30-day readmission after LSG. Such factors should be considered by CMS when deciding on penalties related to readmission.

Changes in the Utilization of the BI-RADS Category 3 Assessment in Recalled Patients Before and After the Implementation of Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the utilization of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3 assessment in patients recalled from screening before and after the implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 11,478 digital mammography (DM) screening exams and 9350 DM+DBT screening exams. Lesions assigned a BI-RADS category 3 at diagnostic exam were classified as architectural distortions, asymmetries, calcifications, masses, and "other" and followed for a minimum of 2 years. RESULTS: The addition of DBT to screening DM resulted in a 30.4% relative reduction (10.3 women per 1000) in the utilization of BI-RADS category 3 compared to screening DM alone (3.4% for DM versus 2.4% for DM+DBT; p < 0.0001). There was a statistically significant change in the distribution of category 3 findings with DM+DBT characterized by an increase in calcifications and architectural distortions and a decrease in asymmetries. There was no change in category 3 assessment for masses. Although both cohorts had delayed cancer detection rates that exceeded the recommended 2% benchmark (2.3% for DM and 3.6% for DM+DBT), when limited to invasive malignancies, the delayed cancer detection rates were below the 2% benchmark (1.5% for DM and 0.9% for DM+DBT). Screening DM+DBT resulted in a 9.2% relative reduction in recall rate compared to DM (13.0% for DM versus 11.8% for DM+ DBT, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Implementation of DBT in the screening population decreased the overall number of patients assigned to short-term follow-up by 10.3 per 1000 women while maintaining comparable rates of delayed cancer detection.