Weight status and nonadherence to asthma maintenance therapy among children enrolled in a public drug insurance plan.

Objective: The pediatric obese-asthma phenotype is associated with poor control, perhaps because of medication nonadherence. This study aimed to assess whether weight status is associated with nonadherence in children prescribed new asthma maintenance therapies.Methods: A historical cohort was constructed from a clinical database linking individual patient and prescription data to Quebec's prescription claims registry. Children aged 2-18 years with specialist-diagnosed asthma who were newly prescribed one of the following maintenance controllers: leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA); low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS); medium/high-dose ICS; or combination therapy (ICS with long-acting beta-2 agonists and/or LTRA), at the Asthma Center of the Montreal Children's Hospital from 2000-2007 were included. Primary nonadherence was defined as not claiming any prescriptions, whereas secondary nonadherence was measured with the proportion of prescribed days covered (PPDC ≤ 50%) among primary adherers over a 6-month follow-up period. A modified Poisson regression model served to estimate the effect of excess weight (BMI > 85th percentile) on primary and secondary nonadherence.Results: Approximately one third of patients were primary nonadherers and 60% took less than 50% of prescribed therapy. Excess weight was associated with a trend toward increased risk of primary nonadherence in children newly prescribed low-dose ICS (RR 1.53, 95%CI 0.94-2.49), and of secondary nonadherence in children initiating medium/high-dose ICS (RR 1.24; 95%CI 0.98-1.59).Conclusions: Excess weight status is a possible determinant of primary nonadherence in children initiating low-dose ICS and secondary nonadherence to higher-dose ICS regimens. This hypothesis-generating study suggests that nonadherence may be a potential contributor to higher morbidity in children with obese-asthma.

Accuracy of the days' supply and the number of refills allowed recorded in Québec prescription claims databases for inhaled corticosteroids.

OBJECTIVES AND HYPOTHESES: Adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is a major issue in asthma. This study aimed to estimate the accuracy of the days' supply and number of refills allowed, variables recorded in Québec claims databases and used to estimate adherence, and to develop correction factors, if required. We hypothesised that the accuracy of the days' supply for ICS would be low whereas the accuracy of the number of refills allowed would be high. SETTING: 40 community pharmacies in Québec (Canada) and a medication registry. PARTICIPANTS: We collected data for 1108 ICS original prescriptions stored in the 40 pharmacies (sample 1), and we obtained a second sample of 2676 ICS prescriptions selected from reMed, a medication registry (sample 2). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: We estimated the concordance of the days' supply and number of refills between Québec claims databases and the original prescription from sample 1. We developed a correction factor for the days' supply in sample 1 and validated it in sample 2. Analyses were stratified by age: 0-11 and 12-64 years. RESULTS: In sample 1, the concordance for the days' supply was 39.6% (95% CI 37.6% to 41.6%) in those aged 0-11 years and 56% (54.9% to 57.2%) in those aged 12-64 years. The concordance increased to 59.4% (58.2% to 60.5%) in those aged 0-11 years and 74.2% (73.5% to 74.9%) in those aged 12-64 years after applying the correction factors in sample 2. The concordance for the refills allowed was 92.1% (91% to 93.1%) in those aged 0-11 years and 93.1% (92.5% to 93.7%) in those aged 12-64 years in sample 1. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of the days' supply was moderate among those aged 0-11 years and substantial among those aged 12-64 years after applying the correction factors. The accuracy of the number of refills was almost perfect in both groups.

Diagnosis, management, and prognosis of preschool wheeze.

Preschool children (ie, those aged 5 years or younger) with wheeze consume a disproportionately high amount of health-care resources compared with older children and adults with wheeze or asthma, representing a diagnostic challenge. Although several phenotype classifications have been described, none have been validated to identify individuals responding to specific therapeutic approaches. Several risk factors related to genetic, prenatal, and postnatal environment are associated with preschool wheezing. Findings from several cohort studies have shown that preschool children with wheeze have deficits in lung function at 6 years of age that persisted until early and middle adulthood, suggesting increased susceptibility in the first years of life that might lead to persistent sequelae. Daily inhaled corticosteroids seem to be the most effective therapy for recurrent wheezing in trials of children with interim symptoms or atopy; intermittent high-dose inhaled corticosteroids are effective in moderate-to-severe viral-induced wheezing without interim symptoms. The role of leukotriene receptor antagonist is less clear. Interventions to modify the short-term and long-term outcomes of preschool wheeze should be a research priority.

Development and pretesting of an electronic learning module to train health care professionals on the use of the Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure to assess acute asthma severity.

BACKGROUND: Severity-specific guidelines based on the Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM), a validated clinical score, reduce pediatric asthma hospitalization rates. OBJECTIVE: To develop, pretest the educational value of and revise an electronic learning module to train health care professionals on the use of the PRAM. METHODS: The respiratory efforts of 32 children with acute asthma were videotaped and pulmonary auscultation was recorded. A pilot module, composed of a tutorial and 18 clinical cases, was developed in French and English. Health care professionals completed the module and provided feedback. The performance of participants, case quality and difficulty, and learning curve were assessed using the Rasch test; quantitative and qualitative feedback served to revise the module. RESULTS: Seventy-two participants (19 physicians, 22 nurses, four respiratory therapists and 27 health care trainees) with a balanced distribution across self-declared expertise (26% beginner, 35% competent and 39% expert) were included. The accuracy of experts was superior to beginners (OR 1.79, 1.15 and 2.79, respectively). Overall performance significantly improved between the first and latter half of cases (P<0.001). Participants assessed the module to be clear (96%), relevant (98%), realistic (94%) and useful (99%) to learn the PRAM. The qualitative/quantitative analysis led to the deletion of three cases, modification of remaining cases to further enhance quality and reordering within three levels of difficulty. DISCUSSION: Using rigorous educational methods, an electronic module was developed to teach health care professionals on use of the PRAM score. Using the back-translation technique, both French and English versions were developed and validated simultaneously. The pilot module comprised a tutorial and three case-scenario sections, and was tested on a target audience of physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists and medical trainees. CONCLUSION: The final electronic learning module met the clarity and quality requirements of a good teaching tool, with a demonstrated learning effect and high appreciation by health care professionals. Available in French and English, it is offered to facilitate implementation of PRAM-based acute pediatric asthma guidelines.

Best strategies to implement clinical pathways in an emergency department setting: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The clinical pathway is a tool that operationalizes best evidence recommendations and clinical practice guidelines in an accessible format for 'point of care' management by multidisciplinary health teams in hospital settings. While high-quality, expert-developed clinical pathways have many potential benefits, their impact has been limited by variable implementation strategies and suboptimal research designs. Best strategies for implementing pathways into hospital settings remain unknown. This study will seek to develop and comprehensively evaluate best strategies for effective local implementation of externally developed expert clinical pathways. DESIGN/METHODS: We will develop a theory-based and knowledge user-informed intervention strategy to implement two pediatric clinical pathways: asthma and gastroenteritis. Using a balanced incomplete block design, we will randomize 16 community emergency departments to receive the intervention for one clinical pathway and serve as control for the alternate clinical pathway, thus conducting two cluster randomized controlled trials to evaluate this implementation intervention. A minimization procedure will be used to randomize sites. Intervention sites will receive a tailored strategy to support full clinical pathway implementation. We will evaluate implementation strategy effectiveness through measurement of relevant process and clinical outcomes. The primary process outcome will be the presence of an appropriately completed clinical pathway on the chart for relevant patients. Primary clinical outcomes for each clinical pathway include the following: Asthma--the proportion of asthmatic patients treated appropriately with corticosteroids in the emergency department and at discharge; and Gastroenteritis--the proportion of relevant patients appropriately treated with oral rehydration therapy. Data sources include chart audits, administrative databases, environmental scans, and qualitative interviews. We will also conduct an overall process evaluation to assess the implementation strategy and an economic analysis to evaluate implementation costs and benefits. DISCUSSION: This study will contribute to the body of evidence supporting effective strategies for clinical pathway implementation, and ultimately reducing the research to practice gaps by operationalizing best evidence care recommendations through effective use of clinical pathways. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01815710.

High physician adherence to phenotype-specific asthma guidelines, but large variability in phenotype assessment in children.

BACKGROUND: The implementation of international pediatric asthma guidelines hinges on the distinction between intermittent and persistent phenotypes and the prescription of recommended phenotype-specific pharmacotherapy. OBJECTIVES: To ascertain key factors associated with specialist-confirmed phenotype and document physicians' adherence to practice recommendations in an academic pediatric asthma center. DESIGN/METHODS: Using electronic health records, we identified a cohort of children aged 1-17 years who presented to a tertiary-care asthma center between 2002 and 2007 and received a diagnosis of asthma from a pediatric specialist. Outcomes included: determinants of phenotypes and conformity with phenotype-specific treatment recommendations. RESULTS: Of the 3490 eligible children (11,119 visits), most (47%) were preschoolers, 35% were 6-11 years and 18%, 13-17 years. Of children with confirmed asthma, 59% were classified on presentation as having intermittent, 41% as persistent, asthma. The within-patient phenotype varied over time with a consistency index of 0.76 (best=1); the latter was significantly lower in preschoolers than older children (p<0.0001). The persistent phenotype was highly physician-dependent; it was also positively associated with child's age, asthma severity, multiple triggers, calendar year, and duration of follow-up. Compared to 33% of children with intermittent asthma, 82% of those with persistent asthma were prescribed a maintenance controller, most as monotherapy; combination therapy was usually prescribed after a trial of monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Pediatric asthma specialists were highly adherent to phenotype-specific pharmacotherapy. However, even in an academic center, the notable degree of intra-patient and between-physician variation in phenotype, particularly in preschoolers, was an important impediment to prescribing a maintenance controller. The findings underline the importance of developing validated and standardized means of assessing phenotypes, applicable to the whole pediatric age spectrum.

Interventions for educating children who are at risk of asthma-related emergency department attendance.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is the most common chronic childhood illness and is a leading cause for paediatric admission to hospital. Asthma management for children results in substantial costs. There is evidence to suggest that hospital admissions could be reduced with effective education for parents and children about asthma and its management. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review of the literature and update the previous review as to whether asthma education leads to improved health outcomes in children who have attended the emergency room for asthma. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Trials Register, including the MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases, and reference lists of trials and review articles (last search May 2008). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials of asthma education for children who had attended the emergency department for asthma, with or without hospitalisation, within the previous 12 months. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. We pooled dichotomous data with a fixed-effect risk ratio. We used a random-effects risk ratio for sensitivity analysis of heterogenous data. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 38 studies involving 7843 children were included. Following educational intervention delivered to children, their parents or both, there was a significantly reduced risk of subsequent emergency department visits (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.81, N = 3008) and hospital admissions (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.92, N = 4019) compared with control. There were also fewer unscheduled doctor visits (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.81, N = 1009). Very few data were available for other outcomes (FEV1, PEF, rescue medication use, quality of life or symptoms) and there was no statistically significant difference between education and control. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Asthma education aimed at children and their carers who present to the emergency department for acute exacerbations can result in lower risk of future emergency department presentation and hospital admission. There remains uncertainty as to the long-term effect of education on other markers of asthma morbidity such as quality of life, symptoms and lung function. It remains unclear as to what type, duration and intensity of educational packages are the most effective in reducing acute care utilisation.

Two for one: a self-management plan coupled with a prescription sheet for children with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Despite strong recommendations in the asthma guidelines, the use of written self-management plans remains low among asthmatic patients. OBJECTIVES: To develop a written self-management plan, based on scientific evidence and expert opinions, in a format intended to facilitate its dispensing by health care professionals, and to test the perception of its relevance and clarity by asthmatic children, adolescents and adults. METHODS: Inspired by previously tested self-management plans, surveys of asthma educators, expert opinions and the 2004 Canadian Asthma Guidelines, the authors simultaneously developed French and English versions of a written self-management plan that coupled with a prescription. The self-management plan was tested in parents and their asthmatic children (aged one to 17 years), and it was revised until 85% clarity and perceived relevance was achieved. RESULTS: Ninety-seven children and their parents were interviewed. Twenty per cent had a self-management plan. On the final revision, nearly all items were clear and perceived relevant by 85% or more of the interviewees. Two self-management plans were designed for clinics and acute care settings, respectively. The plans are divided into three control zones identified by symptoms with optional peak flow values and symbolized by traffic light colours. They are designed in triplicate format with a prescription slip, a medical chart copy and a patient copy. CONCLUSION: The written self-management plans, based on available scientific evidence and expert opinions, are clear and perceived to be relevant by children, adolescents and their parents. By incorporating the prescription and chart copies, they were designed to facilitate dispensing by physicians in both clinics and acute care settings.

The Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure: a valid clinical score for assessing acute asthma severity from toddlers to teenagers.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the performance characteristics of the Preschool Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) in preschool and school-aged children with acute asthma. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective cohort study, we examined the validity, responsiveness, and reliability of the PRAM in children aged 2 to 17 years with acute asthma. The study involved more than 100 nurses and physicians who recorded the PRAM on triage, after initial bronchodilation, and at disposition. Predictive validity and responsiveness were examined using disposition as outcome. RESULTS: The PRAM was recorded in 81% (n = 782) of patients at triage. The PRAM at triage and after initial bronchodilation showed a strong association with admission (r = 0.4 and 0.5, respectively; P < .0001), thus supporting its ability to distinguish across severity levels. The responsiveness coefficient of 0.7 indicated good ability to identify change after bronchodilation. The PRAM showed good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.71) and inter-rater reliability (r = 0.78) for all patients and across all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Good performance characteristics were observed in all age groups, making the PRAM an attractive score for assessing asthma severity and response to treatment.

The Asthma Quiz for Kidz: a validated tool to appreciate the level of asthma control in children.

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need to bridge the large gap between optimal and observed asthma control among Canadian children. OBJECTIVES: To adapt the criteria of asthma control proposed in the 1999 Asthma Consensus Statement for children and validate the proposed cut-offs in children with asthma. METHODS: Six clinical criteria of asthma control were phrased as questions and response options, and pretested for clarity. A cross-sectional study was conducted in children one to 17 years of age presenting to the hospital's asthma clinics. Children nine years of age or older and their parents were asked to complete The Asthma Quiz for Kidz separately, and then together, before the medical visit. Parents of younger children completed the questionnaire with their child. Physicians were not informed of the results of the quiz. RESULTS: The mean age of the 343 participants was 8.0+/-4.4 (SD) years with a mean baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 s of 96+/-15% of predicted values. Asthma severity was rated as mild (67%), moderate (29%) or severe (4%). Overall, 57% of subjects endorsed at least two of the six criteria of poor control. The median (interquartile range) Asthma Quiz score was significantly higher when the physician's assessment of asthma control was poor than when the physician's assessment of asthma control was good (3 [1, 5] versus 1 [0, 2], P<0.001), but it did not correlate with the spirometry. A score of at least 2 out of 6 had 73% sensitivity and 59% specificity for identifying poor control. INTERPRETATION: The Asthma Quiz score provides complementary information to, but does not replace, lung function testing. A score of 2 or more out of 6 suggests poor asthma control and should prompt patients to consult their physician for reassessment.