[Ukrainians Refugees: how to address their health needs in times of migration crisis?] / Réfugiés d'Ukraine : comment répondre à leurs besoins de santé en période de crise migratoire ?

February 2022: Russia attacks Ukraine. Anticipating the wave of refugees generated by this war, the Geneva University Hospitals create a Ukraine Task Force. In this context, the Programme Santé Migrants (PSM), a reference consultation for refugees, realises that it will not be able to cope with the number of those coming from Ukraine in addition to the others, and creates a parallel structure: the PSM bis. The article describes how it was set up and the challenges that were faced, in particular: express training of staff in ambulatory medicine in a context of migratory crisis, focus on early identification of mental health problems and their management. This experience highlights the importance of a coordinated, interdisciplinary, and culturally adapted approach to responding to a crisis situation.

Février 2022 : la Russie attaque l'Ukraine. Anticipant la vague de réfugiés générée par cette guerre, les Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève créent une Task Force Ukraine. Dans ce contexte, le Programme santé migrants (PSM), consultation de référence pour les réfugiés, réalise qu'il ne pourra pas faire face au nombre de ceux venant d'Ukraine en plus des autres et créé une structure parallèle : le PSM bis. L'article relate comment elle s'est mise en place et les défis qui ont été affrontés, notamment : formation express du personnel à la médecine ambulatoire dans un contexte de crise migratoire et focus sur l'identification précoce des problèmes de santé mentale et leur prise en charge. Cette expérience souligne l'importance d'une approche coordonnée, interprofessionnelle et culturellement adaptée, pour répondre à une situation de crise.

[Migrants in a vulnerable situation†: does their access to healthcare match their health needs†?] / Migrants en situation vulnérable†: leur accès aux soins correspond-il à leurs besoins de santé†?

At the beginning of the twenty-first century, migratory movements have never been so large and complex. After describing the risk factors influencing the health of migrants in vulnerable situations (asylum seekers, undocumented migrants), this article attempts to describe a holistic model of access to care for this type of population. It also develops a plea for equitable treatment of migrants in their host country, while respecting basic human rights and the independence of the medical profession.

En ce début de XXIe siècle, les mouvements migratoires n'ont jamais été aussi nombreux et complexes. Après avoir décrits les facteurs de risque influençant la santé des migrants en situation de vulnérabilité (demandeurs d'asile, sans-papiers), cet article s'attache à décrire un modèle holistique d'accès aux soins pour ce type de population. Il développe également un plaidoyer pour une prise en charge équitable des migrants dans leur pays d'accueil, dans le respect des droits humains fondamentaux et de l'indépendance de la profession médicale.

Migrant and refugee populations: a public health and policy perspective on a continuing global crisis.

The 2015-2017 global migratory crisis saw unprecedented numbers of people on the move and tremendous diversity in terms of age, gender and medical requirements. This article focuses on key emerging public health issues around migrant populations and their interactions with host populations. Basic needs and rights of migrants and refugees are not always respected in regard to article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and article 23 of the Refugee Convention. These are populations with varying degrees of vulnerability and needs in terms of protection, security, rights, and access to healthcare. Their health status, initially conditioned by the situation at the point of origin, is often jeopardised by adverse conditions along migratory paths and in intermediate and final destination countries. Due to their condition, forcibly displaced migrants and refugees face a triple burden of non-communicable diseases, infectious diseases, and mental health issues. There are specific challenges regarding chronic infectious and neglected tropical diseases, for which awareness in host countries is imperative. Health risks in terms of susceptibility to, and dissemination of, infectious diseases are not unidirectional. The response, including the humanitarian effort, whose aim is to guarantee access to basic needs (food, water and sanitation, healthcare), is gripped with numerous challenges. Evaluation of current policy shows insufficiency regarding the provision of basic needs to migrant populations, even in the countries that do the most. Governments around the world need to rise to the occasion and adopt policies that guarantee universal health coverage, for migrants and refugees, as well as host populations, in accordance with the UN Sustainable Development Goals. An expert consultation was carried out in the form of a pre-conference workshop during the 4th International Conference on Prevention and Infection Control (ICPIC) in Geneva, Switzerland, on 20 June 2017, the United Nations World Refugee Day.

Fleshing out vulnerability.

In the literature on medical ethics, it is generally admitted that vulnerable persons or groups deserve special attention, care or protection. One can define vulnerable persons as those having a greater likelihood of being wronged - that is, of being denied adequate satisfaction of certain legitimate claims. The conjunction of these two points entails what we call the Special Protection Thesis. It asserts that persons with a greater likelihood of being denied adequate satisfaction of their legitimate claims deserve special attention, care or protection. Such a thesis remains vague, however, as long as we do not know what legitimate claims are. This article aims at dispelling this vagueness by exploring what claims we have in relation to health care - thus fleshing out a claim-based conception of vulnerability. We argue that the Special Protection Thesis must be enriched as follows: If individual or group X has a greater likelihood of being denied adequate satisfaction of some of their legitimate claims to (i) physical integrity, (ii) autonomy, (iii) freedom, (iv) social provision, (v) impartial quality of government, (vi) social bases of self-respect or (vii) communal belonging, then X deserves special attention, care or protection. With this improved understanding of vulnerability, vulnerability talk in healthcare ethics can escape vagueness and serve as an adequate basis for practice.

Suboptimal access to primary healthcare among street-based sex workers in southwest Switzerland.

OBJECTIVES: Street-based sex workers (SSWs) in Lausanne, Switzerland, are poorly characterised. We set out to quantify potential vulnerability factors in this population and to examine SSW healthcare use and unmet healthcare requirements. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey among SSWs working in Lausanne's red light district between 1 February and 31 July 2010, examining SSW socio-demographic characteristics and factors related to their healthcare. RESULTS: We interviewed 50 SSWs (76% of those approached). A fifth conducted their interviews in French, the official language in Lausanne. 48 participants (96%) were migrants, of whom 33/48 (69%) held no residence permit. 22/50 (44%) had been educated beyond obligatory schooling. 28/50 (56%) had no health insurance. 18/50 (36%) had been victims of physical violence. While 36/50 (72%) had seen a doctor during the preceding 12 months, only 15/50 (30%) were aware of a free clinic for individuals without health insurance. Those unaware of free services consulted emergency departments or doctors outside Switzerland. Gynaecology, primary healthcare and dental services were most often listed as needed. Two individuals (of 50, 4%) disclosed positive HIV status; of the others, 24/48 (50%) had never had an HIV test. CONCLUSIONS: This vulnerable population comprises SSWs who, whether through mobility, insufficient education or language barriers, are unaware of services they are entitled to. With half the participants reporting no HIV testing, there is a need to enhance awareness of available facilities as well as to increase provision and uptake of HIV testing.