Drug Susceptibility Assessment in Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia Strains Isolated From the Blood of Organ Transplantation Recipients in a Warsaw Teaching Hospital During 2011 to 2014.

BACKGROUND: Blood infections with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative carbapenem-resistant bacilli are particularly dangerous and challenging to treat in organ transplant recipients. Resistance to carbapenems may be acquired, for example, in Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas, or Acinetobacter spp. or innate, for example, in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. The purpose of this study was to analyze blood infections caused by S maltophilia in organ transplant recipients and to compare drug susceptibility of these bacteria and the same species isolated from the blood of other inpatients. METHODS: A total of 26 S maltophilia strains isolated from blood samples of 26 patients (including 14 liver or kidney transplant recipients) hospitalized during 2011 to 2014 were evaluated in this study. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined via E-test and disk diffusion methods. RESULTS: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains isolated from blood exhibited sensitivity to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (100%), levofloxacin (96.2%), ciprofloxacin (92.3%), ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (80.8%), and ceftazidime (53.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Because appropriate antibiotic therapy in the case of S maltophilia differs from the standard empirical therapy administered in the case of most other Gram-negative bacilli, early identification of this pathogen is of particular significance. The use of antibiotics to which this pathogen is sensitive eliminates the infection and helps avoid graft loss.

Assessment of the Hemostatic Parameters and Platelet Function on Thromboelastometry and Impedance Aggregometry in Hemodialysis Patients Qualified for Kidney Transplantation: Preliminary Report.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease is one of the medical conditions that affect hemostasis. Patients undergoing hemodialysis present both hemorrhagic and prothrombotic tendencies. Platelet adhesion to the artificial surface of the dialyzer's membrane, blood vessel endothelial wall disruption, and quantitative and qualitative changes in clothing factors are thought to be causative agents of the above-mentioned conditions. Thromboelastometry and impedance aggregometry enable precise assessment of clot formation and platelet function abnormalities, including changes related to chronic renal failure in patients undergoing renal replacement therapy. METHODS: A prospective study with control group was designed. The study group consisted of 17 adults with diagnosed chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis. The control group consisted of 13 healthy volunteers. EXTEM and FIBTEM tests in rotational thromboelastometry and TRAPtest in impedance aggregometry analyzer were performed. RESULTS: EXTEM parameter test results were comparable between analyzed groups, whereas FIBTEM test results were significantly increased in the study group. Platelet aggregation as measured by the TRAPtests was significantly decreased in patients undergoing hemodialysis. CONCLUSIONS: In end-stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis, whole-blood clot formation is not disturbed, even though platelet dysfunction occurs. Increased fibrin clot formation reflected by FIBTEM results may compensate the observed platelet disorders. The compilation of ROTEM and Multiplate may support appropriate hemostatic control and decision-making during kidney transplantation.

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) assessment in the first year after renal transplantation and its relationship with graft function and left ventricular hypertrophy.

BACKGROUND: NT-proBNP is a natriuretic neurohormone released mainly from ventricular cardiomyocytes in conditions of volumetric or pressure overload; it is suitable for use as a marker of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), a common disorder in renal transplant recipients. The study objective here was to assess NT-proBNP levels in the 1st year after renal transplantation (RT) and its relationship with graft function and LVH. METHODS: Sixty patients (age, 49 ± 16.9 y; male, 58%) were subjected to prospective 1-year follow-up. Basic blood tests and NT-proBNP level measurements were performed twice (in the early period and at 1 year after transplantation). Cardiac echography was performed in 40 patients. LVH was diagnosed when left ventricular mass index was >95 g/m(2) in women and >115 g/m(2) in men. Statistical analyses were performed with the use of the R Package. RESULTS: At 1 year after RT, the NT-proBNP level decreased >2-fold compared with the early period (median 171 pg/mL [interquartile range (IQR), 104.5-283] vs 368 pg/mL[IQR, 170-629]; P = .00008). In the early post-transplantation period, NT-proBNP correlated with the patient's age, body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, and at 1 year after transplantation its correlation with the eGFR range (patients with eGFR ≥60 mL min(-1) 1.73 m(-2) had significantly lower NT-proBNP levels than those with eGFR <60 mL min(-1) 1.73 m(-2)), with age,and with ejection fraction was found. Patients with LVH had higher NT-proBNP levels than those without LVH in the early period (median 511 pg/mL [IQR, 190-736] vs 380 pg/mL [IQR, 217-511]; P = .09), and at 1 year (median 269 pg/mL [IQR, 155-474] vs 133 pg/mL [IQR, 99-134]; P = .057). At NT-proBNP >480 pg/mL in the early period and >280 pg/mL at 1 year, LVH occurred with a 68% probability (P = .05 and P = .03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: During the 1st year after RT, NT-proBNP levels decrease ≥2-fold and are primarily related to eGFR. NT-proBNP measurements are useful in identifying patients with LVH.

Assessment of kidneys procured from expanded criteria donors before transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Using expanded criteria donor (ECD) organs is 1 strategy to make more organs available for transplant. To reduce the number of posttransplant complications and failures, there is a need to create a comprehensive system of evaluation before transplantation, especially for kidneys harvested from ECD. The aim of this study was to assess the results of kidneys procured from ECD seeking to discover the most useful factors for kidney evaluation before transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-two patients received cadaveric renal transplants between January 1, 2006, and August 31, 2008. We collected data on donors, recipients, and perfusion parameters. We analyzed patient and graft survivals, as well as immediate, delayed, and slow graft function. Kidney recipient function was assessed by serum creatinine concentrations and by creatinine clearance calculated according to the Cockroft-Gault formula. Renal biopsy specimens were obtained in the perioperative periods 147 cases. RESULTS: The overall 1-year graft survival was 86.9%. More than 25% of transplanted kidneys were harvested from ECD. There were no significant differences in patient survival between recipients of standard criteria donor kidneys (RSCDK) versus of expanded criteria donor kidneys (RECDK). One-year graft survival was higher among the RSCDK group than the RECDK group, namely, 94.4% versus 62.5%, (P = .004). There were no differences in the incidence of primary nonfunction or in delayed graft function between the groups. RECDK were more likely to show slow graft function (69.2% vs 37.8%; P = .033). A lower graft survival at 6 months after transplantation was observed among organs harvested from ECD compared with standard criteria donor (SCD) kidneys who showed histologic lesions or a flow at the fourth hour of machine perfusion below 0.4 mL/g. Using a logistic regression model, chronic histologic changes were shown to influence kidney survival at 6 months after transplantation. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in patient survival between recipients of kidneys harvested from expanded versus standard criteria donors. ECD kidneys displayed lower graft survival rates. There was no significant difference in the incidence of delayed graft function between recipients of kidneys harvested from expanded versus standard criteria donors. Pretransplant evaluation of ECD kidneys should include 3 variables: donor parameters, histologic findings, and machine perfusion parameters.

The assessment of residual kidney function after living donor nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients on the waiting list for kidney transplantation is increasing as a result of the cadaveric donor shortage. One way to expand the pool is living donor transplantation. However, only 2% of kidney transplants in Poland come from living-related donors. AIM: We sought to assess residual renal function, incidence of hypertension, and proteinuria among living kidney donors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2004 and 2007, we performed 46 living donor open nephrectomies. The mean age of the kidney donor was 39 years (range, 25-57). The donors were predominantly females (61%). Mean hospitalization time was 8 days (range, 4-22). Nine donors did not report for follow-up visits. The observation periods ranged from 1 to 24 months. Physical examination, blood and urine tests, as well as ultrasound scans were performed before nephrectomy and at every follow-up visit (1, 3, 12, and 24 months post operatively). RESULTS: Mean creatinine concentration was higher at 3 months after nephrectomy than preoperatively (P < .05). Mean creatinine clearance according to Cockroft-Gault formula and mean creatinine clearance according to abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease equation (aMDRD) decreased after donation by 30% (P < .05). No cases of proteinuria were observed. Hypertension occurred in 1 donor (2.7%). CONCLUSION: Living kidney donation resulted in a reduced creatinine clearance in the donor. Follow-up of living kidney donors is essential to determine risk factors for deterioration of residual kidney function.

Laser-Doppler versus fluorometry in the postoperative assessment of a cutaneous free flap.

To find the optimal means for monitoring the vascularity of a cutaneous free flap in the postoperative period, we have experimentally compared laser-Doppler velocimetry and fluorometry. Using the rat groin model, five groups were evaluated: 1. flap isolation without division of the pedicle vessels (island flap); 2) flap isolation, division, and repair of the pedicle artery and vein (free flap); 3) flap isolation, with ligation of the pedicle artery immediately or 1 hour later; 4) flap isolation, with ligation of the pedicle vein immediately or 1 hour later; 5) flap isolation, with ligation of the pedicle artery and vein immediately or 1 hour later. The laser-Doppler processes the signal by combination of the root mean square and differential amplification. The fluoroscan gives an index in relation to the fluorescence of a control area. The results obtained with both methods correlated well with findings in clinical situations. However, the laser-Doppler readings were more rapid and sensitive than those with fluorometry. We suggest that laser-Doppler velocimetry is a superior means of monitoring the vascular status of a free tissue transfer or digital replant.