Paradoxical association between blood modular interferon signatures and quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: Blood transcriptomic IFN signature is a hallmark of SLE. The impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL) observed in SLE is poorly related to disease activity. The aim of this study was to test how IFN signatures were associated with HRQOL in SLE patients. METHODS: Among consecutive patients, blood transcriptomic profiles were analysed with a modular framework comprising 3 IFN modules: M1.2, M3.4 and M5.12. Disease activity was evaluated by the SLEDAI score, and HRQOL was assessed with the SF-36 questionnaire, which includes eight domains: physical function, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health (MH) and physical component summary and mental component summary scores. RESULTS: A total of 57 SLE patients were evaluated, among whom 27 (47%) were clinically quiescent, 30 (53%) were flaring, and 19 (33%) had active lupus nephritis. All SF-36 domains were altered in SLE patients compared with the general French population (P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, taking into account flares, age, ethnicity, smoking and renal severity, social functioning was independently associated with the IFN score (P = 0.027). Analyses restrained to quiescent patients (n = 27) yielded greater associations between social functioning and the three IFN modules, and between MH and M3.4. Considering all quiescent visits (n = 51), the IFN score was independently correlated with social functioning (P = 0.022) and MH (P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: This unexpected paradoxical association between IFN signature and some specific HRQOL domains argues against a pivotal role of IFNs in the persistently altered HRQOL of SLE patients.

Factors associated with health-related quality of life in renal transplant recipients: results of a national survey in France.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to identify factors associated with health related quality of life (HRQOL) through a comprehensive analysis of sociodemographic and clinical variables among a representative sample size of renal transplant recipients (RTR) in France. METHODS: A cross-sectional multicenter study was carried out in 2008. All RTR over 18 years old with a functioning graft for at least one year were included. Data included socio-demographic, health status, and treatment characteristics. To evaluate HRQOL, the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) and a HRQOL instrument for RTR (ReTransQol) were administered. Multivariate linear regression models were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1061 RTR were included, with a return rate of 72.5%. The variance explained in regression models of SF-36 ranges from 20% to 40% and from 9% to 33% for ReTransQol. CONCLUSIONS: The originality of our study's findings was that novel variables, particularly treatment side effects and unemployment, have a negative effect on quality of life of RTR. The French Biomedicine Agency and the National Health Institute for Public Health Surveillance conduct specific actions for professional reintegration and therapeutic education programs in the national plan to improve the HRQOL of people living with chronic diseases.

Development and validation of a French patient-based health-related quality of life instrument in kidney transplant: the ReTransQoL.

BACKGROUND: In the absence of a French health-related quality of life (QOL) instrument for renal transplant recipients (RTR), we developed a self-administered questionnaire: the ReTransQol (RTQ). METHODS: This questionnaire was developed using classical methodology in the following three phases over a two-year period: Item Generation phase, identifying all possible items having adverse impact on the QOL of RTR, Item Reduction phase, selecting the most pertinent items related to QOL, and Validation phase, analyzing the psychometric properties. All RTR involved in these phases were over 18 and were randomly selected from a transplant registry. RESULTS: Item generation was conducted through 24 interviews of RTR. The first version of RTQ (85 items) was sent to 225 randomized RTR, and 40 items were eliminated at the end of the item reduction phase. The second version of RTQ (45 items) was validated from 130 RTR, resulting in the RTQ final version. The factor analysis identified a structure of five factors: Physical Health (PH), Mental Health (MH), Medical Care (MC), Fear of losing the Graft (FG) and Treatment (TR). The psychometric properties of RTQ were satisfactory. Comparison between known groups from the literature confirmed the construct validity: patients without employment or living alone have lower QOL scores, and women have lower QOL scores than men. RTQ was more responsive than SF36 to detect changes in the QOL of RTR who were hospitalized secondary to their renal disease in the 4 weeks preceding their inclusion. CONCLUSION: According to French public health priorities, RTQ appears to be a reliable and valid questionnaire.

[Incidence and management of anemia in renal transplantation: an observational-French study]. / Incidence et prise en charge de l'anémie en transplantation rénale: une étude observationnelle française.

The management of anemia after kidney transplantation remains poorly explored. The Management of Anemia in French Kidney Transplant Patients (MATRIX) study is an observational study conducted in 10 academic hospitals among kidney-transplant patients designed to evaluate the prevalence, associated factors and management of post-transplant anemia. Over two consecutive weeks, 418 recipients (males: 248; age: 50.8+/-12.7 years) were included, all were transplanted for more than six months. Mean serum creatinine (Scr) was 152+/-67 micromol/l and mean hemoglobin (Hb) was 12.4+/-1.8 g/dl (males: 12.8+/-1.9 g/dl; females 11.9+/-1.6 g/dl). Irrespective of the delay following transplantation, 23% of patients (n=95) were severely anemic (Hb < or = 11 g/dl). Eighteen percent of the patients received an antianemic treatment (10% oral iron, 7% erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA), 4% folic acid) and only 35% of the severely anemic patients were actually treated (n=33). A significantly-negative correlation was observed between eGFR and Hb levels (R= -0.347, p<0.02). Ninety-six percent of the 193 patients transplanted for more than six months and a Scr greater than 150 micromol/l (n=185) suffered at least one comorbidity (89% hypertension, 32% hypercholesterolemia, 13% diabetes); this group represent the second cohort. Seventy-four percent of them were treated with mycophenolate mofetil, 16% with azathioprine, and 62% with an ACEI or angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Since the transplantation, 127 patients (66%) have been anemic (Hb < or = 11 g/dl) and 58% (n=112) were treated (iron and/or ESA, respectively 81 and 55%). Among the patients not treated for anemia, 74% had an Hb level below 12g/dl. ESA-treated patients received a mean dose of 8500 UI+/-2800 per week. Anemia is under-diagnosed and under-treated in renal-transplant recipients, despite its high prevalence. As expected, a correlation between renal function and Hb levels was observed, as in CKD patients. Prospective studies are underway to assess the consequences of postkidney transplant anemia on quality of life, cardiovascular morbidity and chronic allograft nephropathy and to define the benefit of the treatment.

[A case-control study of health benefits in patients with moderate renal failure]. / Une étude cas-témoin évaluant les prestations de santé dans une population de malades insuffisants rénaux modérés.

In order to evaluate medical management in patients with renal failure before dialysis, we conducted a case-control study to analyze the health benefits in 914 moderate renal failure patients with Cockcroft clearance between 30 and 60 ml/min. Health benefits reimbursed by the Social Security in this population were compared with those in 1828 controls randomly chosen in the Social Security files but matched by age and gender. Mean age of the participants was 73+/-11 year-old, 67% were women, Cockcroft clearance was 48+/-8 ml/min. Number of hospitalizations and hospitalization durations were not different between the two populations. Conversely, cases had more specialized outpatients' clinics in cardiology but not in nephrology or urology. Cases had more biological tests and radiological exams and had taken more medicines. For biology, cases had more often renal function tests and markers of renal dysfunction tests than controls. Cases had taken more medicines than controls for erythropoietin, diuretics, renin-angiotensin blockers, hypoglycemic drugs, and anticoagulants. Patients with mild renal failure had higher health benefits than controls for outpatients' clinics in cardiology, for biological tests, for radiological exams, and for some medicines.