Registry Data Show Complication Rates and Cost in Revision Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Revision total hip arthroplaty (rTHA) places a burden on patients, surgeons, and health care systems because outcomes and costs are less predictable than primary THA. The purpose of this study was to define indications and treatments for rTHA, quantify risk for readmissions, and evaluate the economic impacts of rTHA in a hospital system. METHODS: The arthroplasty database of a hospital system was queried to generate a retrospective cohort of 793 rTHA procedures, performed on 518 patients, from 2017 to 2019 at 27 hospitals. Surgeons performed chart reviews to classify indication and revision procedure. Demographics, lengths of stay, discharge dispositions, and readmission data were collected. Analyses of direct costs were performed and categorized by revision type. RESULTS: Totally, 46.3% of patients presented for infection. Patients presenting for infection were 5.6 times more likely to have repeat rTHA than aseptic patients. Septic cases (4.3 days) had longer length of stay than aseptic ones (2.4) (P < .0001). However, 31% of patients discharged to a skilled nursing facility. Direct costs were greatest for a two-stage exchange ($37,642) and lowest for liner revision ($8,979). Septic revisions ($17,696) cost more than aseptic revisions ($11,204) (P < .0001). The 90-day readmission rate was 21.8%. Septic revisions had more readmissions (13.5%) than aseptic revisions (8.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Hip revisions, especially for infection, have an increased risk profile and create a major economic impact on hospital systems. Surgeons may use these data to counsel patients on risks of rTHA and advocate for improved reimbursement for the care of revision patients.

The Economic Impact of Lower Extremity Periprosthetic Fractures in a Large Hospital System.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) place a burden on hospital systems. They occur in older patients with medical comorbidities, as unplanned events requiring technically complex surgeries with expensive implants. The purpose of this study was to describe this patient population and evaluate the economic impact of PPFs on a hospital system. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of PPFs of the hip and knee between 2018 and 2019. Demographics, length of stay (LOS), and discharge disposition were collected. We performed chart and radiographic reviews to determine the fracture classification and type of treatment performed. An analysis of direct inpatient costs was performed and categorized by a fracture type. RESULTS: We identified 213 periprosthetic hip and 151 periprosthetic knee fractures. The mean age of hip patients was 77 years, and 71% were female. The average surgery time was 194 minutes, LOS was 5.01 days, and 71% were discharged to a skilled nursing facility (SNF). The mean age of knee patients was 76 years, and 79% were female. The average surgery time was 174 minutes, LOS was 5.12 days, and 70% were discharged to a SNF. The median direct cost of hip fractures was $17,108, with Vancouver B2 and B3 costing significantly more at $19,987 and $23,935, respectively (P value <.0001). The median direct cost of knee fractures was $13,713. Type 3 distal femur fractures cost significantly more at $37,445 (P value <.0001). CONCLUSION: PPFs create a significant economic impact on hospital systems. We stratified the costs of treatment based on the fracture type. Significantly higher costs are associated with injuries requiring revision implants.

Robotic Versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty in High Volume Surgeons: A Comparison of Cost and Quality Metrics.

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) was introduced to improve surgical accuracy and patient outcomes. However, RTKA may also increase operating time and add cost to TKA. This study sought to compare the differences in cost and quality measures between manual TKA (MTKA) and RTKA METHODS: All MTKAs and RTKAs performed between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019, by 6 high volume surgeons in each cohort, were retrospectively reviewed. Cohorts were propensity score matched. Operative time, length of stay (LOS), total direct cost, 90-day complications, utilization of postacute services, and 30-day readmissions were studied. RESULTS: After one-to-one matching, 2392 MTKAs and 2392 RTKAs were studied. In-room/out-of-room operating time was longer for RTKA (139 minutes) than for MTKA (107 minutes) P < .0001, as was procedure time (RTKA 78 minutes; MTKA 70 minutes), P < .0001. Median LOS was equal for MTKA and RTKA (33 hours). Total cost per case was greater for RTKA ($11,615) than MTKA ($8674), P < .0001. Home health care was utilized more frequently after RTKA (38%) than MTKA (29%), P < .0001. There was no significant difference in 90-day complication rates. Thirty-day readmissions occurred more often after MTKA (4.9%) than RTKA (1.2%), P < .0001. CONCLUSION: RTKA was a longer and costlier procedure than MTKA for experienced surgeons, without clinically significant differences in LOS or complications. Home health care was utilized more often after RTKA, but fewer readmissions occurred after RTKA. Longer term follow-up and functional outcome studies are required to determine if the greater cost of RTKA is offset by lower revision rates and/or improved functional results.

Cementless Fixation Is Associated With Increased Risk of Early and All-Time Revision After Hemiarthroplasty But Not After THA for Femoral Neck Fracture: Results From the American Joint Replacement Registry.

BACKGROUND: Despite ample evidence supporting cemented femoral fixation for both hemiarthroplasty and THA for surgical treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures, cementless fixation is the preferred fixation method in the United States. To our knowledge, no nationally representative registry from the United States has compared revision rates by fixation for this surgical treatment. QUESTION/PURPOSE: After controlling for relevant confounding variables, is femoral fixation method (cemented or cementless) in hemiarthroplasty or THA for femoral neck fracture associated with a greater risk of (1) all-cause revision or (2) revision for periprosthetic fracture? METHODS: Patients with Medicare insurance who had femoral neck fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty or THA reported in the American Joint Replacement Registry database from 2012 to 2017 and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services claims data from 2012 to 2017 were analyzed in this retrospective, large-database study. Of the 37,201 hemiarthroplasties, 42% (15,748) used cemented fixation and 58% (21,453) used cementless fixation. Of the 7732 THAs, 20% (1511) used cemented stem fixation and 80% (6221) used cementless stem fixation. For both the hemiarthroplasty and THA cohorts, most patients were women and had cementless femoral fixation. Early revision was defined as a procedure that occurred less than 90 days from the index procedure. All patients submitted to the registry were included in the analysis. Patient follow-up was limited to the study period. No patients were lost to follow-up. Due to inherent limitations with the registry, we did not compare medical complications, including deaths attributed directly to cemented fixation. A logistic regression model including the index arthroplasty, age, gender, stem fixation method, hospital size, hospital teaching affiliation, and Charlson comorbidity index score was used to determine associations between the index procedure and revision rates. RESULTS: For the hemiarthroplasty cohort, risk factors for any revision were cementless stem fixation (odds ratio 1.42 [95% confidence interval 1.20 to 1.68]; p < 0.001), younger age (OR 0.96 [95% CI 0.95 to 0.97]; p < 0.001), and higher Charlson comorbidity index (OR 1.06 [95% CI 1.02 to 1.11]; p = 0.004). Risk factors for early revision were cementless stem fixation (OR 1.77 [95% CI 1.43 to 2.20]; p < 0.001), younger age (OR 0.98 [95% CI 0.97 to 0.99]; p < 0.001), and higher Charlson comorbidity index (OR 1.09 [95% CI 1.04 to 1.15]; p < 0.001). Risk factors for revision due to periprosthetic fracture were cementless fixation (OR 6.19 [95% CI 3.08 to 12.42]; p < 0.001) and higher Charlson comorbidity index (OR 1.16 [95% CI 1.06 to 1.28]; p = 0.002). Risk factors for early revision due to periprosthetic fracture were cementless fixation (OR 7.38 [95% CI 3.17 to 17.17]; p < 0.001), major teaching hospital (OR 2.10 [95% CI 1.08 to 4.10]; p = 0.03), and higher Charlson comorbidity index (OR 1.20 [95% CI 1.09 to 1.33]; p < 0.001). For the THA cohort, there were no associations. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that cemented fixation should be the preferred technique for most patients with displaced femoral neck fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty. The fact that stem fixation method did not affect revision rates for those patients with displaced femoral neck fractures treated with THA may be due to current practice patterns in the United States. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Impact of Anterior vs Posterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty on Post-Acute Care Service Utilization.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists as to which surgical approach is best for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Previous studies suggested that the tissue-sparing anterior approach should result in a more rapid recovery requiring fewer postacute services, ultimately decreasing overall episodic cost. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to determine if any significant differences exist between the anterior vs posterior approaches on postacute care service utilization, readmissions, or episodic cost. METHODS: Claims data from 26,773 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries receiving elective THAs (Medical Severity-Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRGs) 469/470) were analyzed. Claims data were collected from the 2-year period, January 2013 through December 2014. The posterior surgical approach was performed on 23,653 patients while 3120 patients received the anterior approach. RESULTS: Data analysis showed negligible effect sizes in postacute care service utilization, readmission rate, and cost between the surgical approaches for elective THA (MS-DRG 469 and 470). Average THA total episode cost was negligibly higher for procedures using the anterior approach compared to the posterior approach ($22,517 and $22,068, respectively). Statistically significant differences were observed in inpatient rehab and home health cost and service utilization. However, the effect sizes of these comparisons are negligible when accounting for the large sample size. All other comparisons showed minimal and statistically insignificant variation. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that surgical approach alone is not the primary driver of postacute care service utilization, quality outcomes, or cost. Other factors such as physician-led patient-focused care pathways, care coordination, rapid rehabilitation protocols, perioperative pain management protocols, and patient education are integral for effective patient care.

Physicians With Defined Clear Care Pathways Have Better Discharge Disposition and Lower Cost.

BACKGROUND: There is a pronounced need for a sustainable care model for total joint arthroplasty in the United States. Total hip and knee arthroplasty is expected to increase 673% by 2030, and Medicare is the payor for a majority of these episodes. Our objective was to compare orthopedic cohort groups with and without defined postacute care pathways and the effects of the care pathways on service utilization and cost for Medicare patients in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement program. METHODS: Claims data for elective hip and knee arthroplasty episodes from a national bundled payments for care improvement database were the source of our study data. Independent reviewers were used to determine which groups had defined clinical pathways. The 2 cohort groups were then compared between those with defined clinical pathways and those without. Outcomes measures included postacute care costs, utilization rates (both frequency and length of time) for inpatient rehabilitation facilities, skilled nursing facilities, home health, and readmissions. RESULTS: Orthopedic physicians with defined postacute care pathways showed consistent decreases in cost and utilization as compared to physicians without defined postacute care pathways. Elective hip arthroplasty per episode cost differential was $3189 per episode between physicians with care pathways ($19,005) and those without ($22,195; P < .001). Elective knee arthroplasty per episode cost difference was $2466 per episode between physicians with care pathways ($18,866) and those without ($21,332; P < .001). Incident rates of utilization for postacute care services displayed significant differences between physicians with and without postacute care pathways. Physicians with defined postacute pathways demonstrated utilization reductions ranging from 7% to 79% with incident rate reductions ranging from 44% to 79%. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that orthopedic physicians with defined postacute care pathways affect discharge disposition. The findings show significant cost and utilization reductions for physicians with defined postacute care pathways.

Frequency and Treatment Trends for Periprosthetic Fractures About Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic hip fractures (PPHFx) are challenging complications that have become increasingly more prevalent. Wide variability exists in the quality and size of prior studies pertaining to hospital stay information. This study used the largest publicly available database in the United States to evaluate perioperative hospital data of PPHFx. METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to analyze trends related to the frequency, fracture type, mortality, treatment, patient demographics, time to surgery, length of stay (LOS), and hospital charges associated with PPHFx from 2006-2010. RESULTS: From 2006-2010, average patient age (76.7 years), hospital characteristics, rate of PPHFx, treatment choice, LOS (8.03 days), mortality (2.6%), disposition (78.1% to skilled nursing facility or inpatient rehab), and time to procedure (1.98 days) all remained relatively stable. The southern United States had the highest frequency of PPHFx and females had nearly twice the rate of PPHFx each year at an average of 67%. Despite these consistencies, hospital charges increased by an average of 8.3% per year over the study period ($27,683 over 5 years, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: In the era of containing cost while improving quality of care, this study demonstrates that despite consistent treatment trends of PPHFx, hospital charges are increasing independently. Regardless, surgeons can work to reduce LOS and charge to post acute care facilities to lessen spending. Refining our understanding of these relationships will be fundamental to further improving quality of care and cutting cost associated with these fractures.

Standardizing Care and Improving Quality under a Bundled Payment Initiative for Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Increasing demands for episodic bundled payments in total hip and knee arthroplasty are motivating providers to wring out inefficiencies and coordinate services. This study describes a care pathway and gainshare arrangement as the mechanism by which improvements in efficiency were realized under a bundled payment pilot. Analysis of cut-to-close time, LOS, discharge destination, implant cost, and total allowed claims between pre-pilot and pilot cohorts showed an 18% reduction in average LOS (70.8 to 58.2 hours) and a shift from home health and skilled nursing facility discharge to home self-care (54.1% to 63.7%). No significant differences were observed for cut-to-close time and implant cost. Improvements resulted in a 6% reduction in the average total allowed claims per case.

The economic impact of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.

We compared hospital length of stay (LOS) and costs between (1) minimally invasive total hip surgery (MIS) combined with an active hip pathway (AHP) and (2) long incision total hip surgery (LIS) with a passive hip pathway (PHP). A prospective consecutive cohort of 214 MIS/AHP patients was compared to a concurrent cohort of 265 LIS/PHP patients. The MIS/AHP cohort had significantly decreased LOS (1.5 days vs. 3.8 days, P < .001) and hospital costs ($12.8 thousand vs. $16.7 thousand, P < .001). The complication rates were similar for MIS/AHP and LIS/PHP. We conclude that, compared to LIS/PHP, MIS/AHP significantly shortened LOS by an average of 2.3 days, and significantly reduced hospital costs by an average of $3.9 thousand per patient.