Disparities in Parathyroidectomy: Who Receives Appropriate Treatment for Primary Hyperparathyroidism?

INTRODUCTION: Parathyroidectomy is underperformed despite clear benefits in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). We evaluated disparities in receipt of parathyroidectomy following PHPT diagnosis to explore barriers to care. METHODS: Adults diagnosed with PHPT 2013-2018 at a health system were identified. Recommended indications for parathyroidectomy include age ≤50 y, calcium >11 mg/dL, or the presence of nephrolithiasis, hypercalciuria, nephrocalcinosis, decreased glomerular filtration rate, osteopenia, osteoporosis, or pathological fracture 1 y prior to diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed rates of parathyroidectomy within 12 mo following diagnosis as well as median time to parathyroidectomy, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses assessed factors associated with undergoing parathyroidectomy. RESULTS: Of 2409 patients, 75% were females, 12% aged ≤50 y, and 92% non-Hispanic White, while 52% had Medicaid/Medicare, 36% were commercial/self-pay or uninsured, and 12% unknown. Parathyroidectomy was performed within 1 y in 50% of patients. Within the 68% that met recommendations, parathyroidectomy was performed within 1 y in 54%; median time from diagnosis to surgery was shorter for males, patients aged ≤50 y, commercial/self-pay/no insurance patients (versus Medicaid/Medicare), and those with fewer comorbidities, P < 0.05. Multivariable analysis demonstrated non-Hispanic White patients and those with commercial/self-pay/uninsured were more likely to undergo parathyroidectomy after adjusting for comorbidity, age, and facility site. Among those strongly indicated, patients not on Medicare/Medicaid and aged ≤50 y were more likely to undergo parathyroidectomy after adjusting for race, comorbidity, and facility site. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in parathyroidectomy for PHPT were observed. Insurance type was associated with undergoing parathyroidectomy; patients on governmental insurance were less likely to undergo surgery and waited longer for surgery despite strong indications. Barriers to referral and access to surgery should be investigated and addressed to optimize all patients' access to care.

Early assessment of postoperative adrenal function is necessary after adrenalectomy for mild autonomous cortisol secretion.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic threshold for mild autonomous cortisol secretion using low dose, overnight, dexamethasone suppression testing is recognized widely as a serum cortisol ≥1.8 mcg/dL. The degree to which these patients require postoperative glucocorticoid replacement is unknown. METHODS: We reviewed adult patients with corticotropin (ACTH)-independent hypercortisolism who underwent unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy for benign disease with a dexamethasone suppression testing ≥1.8 mcg/dL at our institution from 1996 to 2018. Patients with a dexamethasone suppression testing of 1.8 to 5 mcg/dL were compared with those with a dexamethasone suppression testing >5 mcg/dL. RESULTS: We compared 68 patients with a preoperative dexamethasone suppression testing of 1.8 to 5 mcg/dL to 53 patients with a preoperative dexamethasone suppression testing >5 mcg/dL. Preoperative serum ACTH (mean 10.0 vs 9.2 pg/mL), adenoma size (mean 3.4 vs 3.5 cm), and side of adrenalectomy (37 and 47% right) were similar between groups (P > .05 each). Patients with a dexamethasone suppression testing 1.8 to 5 mcg/dL were older (mean values 58 ± 11 vs 52 ± 16 years ; P = .01), less likely to be female (63 vs 81%; P = .03), had greater body mass indexes (33.1 ± 8.4 vs 29.1 ± 5.6; P = .01), and had lesser 24 hour preoperative urine cortisol excretions (32.6 ± 26.7 vs 76.1 ± 129.4 mcg; P = .03). Postoperative serum cortisol levels were compared in 22 patients with a dexamethasone suppression testing of 1.8 to 5 mcg/dL to 14 patients with a dexamethasone suppression testing >5 mcg/dL. Those with dexamethasone suppression testing 1.8 to 5 mcg/dL had greater postoperative serum cortisol levels (8.0 ± 5.7 vs 5.0 ± 2.6 mcg/dL; P = .03), were less likely to be discharged on glucocorticoid replacement (59% vs 89%; P = .003), and had a decreased duration of treatment (4.4 ± 3.8 vs 10.7 ± 18.0 months; P = .04). CONCLUSION: Assessment of early postoperative adrenal function with mild autonomous cortisol secretion is necessary to minimize unnecessary glucocorticoid replacement.

Single-port robotic-assisted adrenalectomy: feasibility, safety, and cost-effectiveness.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The introduction of robotic surgery offers patients and surgeons new options for adrenalectomy. Whereas multiport adrenalectomies have been safely performed using the robot, we describe our experience with the novel technique of single-port robotic-assisted adrenalectomy. METHODS: We performed a matched-cohort study comparing 16 single-port robotic-assisted adrenalectomies with 16 patients from a pool of 148 laparoscopic adrenalectomies, matched for age, gender, operative side, pathology, and body mass index. All were operated on by 1 surgeon. RESULTS: The pathology included aldosteronoma in 44% of patients, adrenocorticotropic hormone-dependent Cushing syndrome (bilateral adrenalectomy) in 19%, pheochromocytoma in 13%, and other pathology in 24%. The operative time was 183 ± 33 minutes for single-port robotic-assisted adrenalectomy and 173 ± 40 minutes for laparoscopic adrenalectomy (P = .58). The total time in the operating room was 246 ± 33 minutes for single-port robotic-assisted adrenalectomy and 240 ± 39 minutes for laparoscopic adrenalectomy (P = .57). There was 1 conversion to open adrenalectomy (6%) in each group, both because of bleeding on the right side during bilateral adrenalectomy. Two right-sided single-port robotic-assisted adrenalectomy patients required conversion to laparoscopic adrenalectomy, one because of poor visualization. There were no deaths. Complications occurred in 2 patients in each group (intensive care unit admission, prolonged ileus). Both groups had similar pain scores (mean of 3.7 on a scale from 1 to 10) on postoperative day 1, and patients in the single-port robotic-assisted adrenalectomy group used less narcotic pain medication in the first 24 hours after surgery (43 mg vs 84 mg in laparoscopic adrenalectomy group, P < .001). The differences between the single-port robotic-assisted adrenalectomy group and laparoscopic adrenalectomy group in length of stay (2.3 ± 0.5 days vs 3.1 ± 0.9 days, P = .23), percentage of patients discharged on postoperative day 1 (56% vs 31%, P = .10), and hospital cost (16% lower in single-port robotic-assisted adrenalectomy group, P = .17) did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Single-port robotic adrenalectomy is feasible; patients require less narcotic pain medication whereas costs appear equivalent compared with laparoscopic adrenalectomy.