Risk assessment of substances that are both genotoxic and carcinogenic report of an International Conference organized by EFSA and WHO with support of ILSI Europe.

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the World Health Organization (WHO), with the support of the International Life Sciences Institute, European Branch (ILSI Europe), organized an international conference on 16-18 November 2005 to discuss how regulatory and advisory bodies evaluate the potential risks of the presence in food of substances that are both genotoxic and carcinogenic. The objectives of the conference were to discuss the possible approaches for risk assessment of such substances, how the approaches may be interpreted and whether they meet the needs of risk managers. ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) provides advice based solely on hazard identification and does not take into account either potency or human exposure. The use of quantitative low-dose extrapolation of dose-response data from an animal bioassay raises numerous scientific uncertainties related to the selection of mathematical models and extrapolation down to levels of human exposure. There was consensus that the margin of exposure (MOE) was the preferred approach because it is based on the available animal dose-response data, without extrapolation, and on human exposures. The MOE can be used for prioritisation of risk management actions but the conference recognised that it is difficult to interpret it in terms of health risk.

Ligand/receptor binding for 2,3,7,8-TCDD: implications for risk assessment.

There is renewed controversy regarding safe exposure levels for dioxin. At the heart of this controversy is the hypothesis that toxic effects of dioxin are receptor-mediated and therefore a "threshold" should exist below which no toxic effects can occur. Our research focuses on the ability of dioxin to alter protein levels in rodent livers. Established effects of exposure to dioxin are the induction of cytochrome P450-1A1 and P450-1A2 and a reduction in the maximal binding of the epidermal growth factor receptor in rat livers. An initiation-promotion protocol was used to study the effects of dioxin in female Sprague-Dawley rats. Animals were administered a single initiating dose of diethylnitrosamine followed by 16 biweekly gavage doses of 2,3,7,8-TCDD. Steady-state pharmacodynamic models were fit to these data assuming a combination of Hill kinetics and Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Two classes of models were developed which postulate two different mechanisms for the constitutive expression and TCDD-induced alterations in the levels of these proteins. The results are consistent with models which follow proportionate response in the low-dose region (no threshold) and with models which allow for a low-dose threshold. In all cases studied, the best fitting model exhibited no "threshold" for the effects of TCDD on the modulation of these proteins. The finding is consistent with the knowledge that for some receptor-mediated responses, there is a proportional relationship between receptor occupancy and biological response, even at low ligand concentrations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A two-sample censored-data rank test for acceleration.

A score test for the null hypothesis of proportional hazards against rank-regression alternatives is proposed as a complement to the logrank test for comparing censored survival curves. The test statistic has an asymptotic normal distribution that is independent of the logrank distribution under the null hypothesis, and its power is good against acceleration alternatives (i.e. with crossing hazards) where the logrank test fails. Monte Carlo studies indicate that its small-sample properties are comparable to those of the logrank and ranksum procedures.