Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
BMC Neurol ; 24(1): 208, 2024 Jun 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38890614

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) significantly impacts the health-related quality of life of affected individuals and their relatives. In order to support the affected individuals and their families in coping with PD, it is essential to offer comprehensive information about their experiences. A comprehensive understanding of their lived experiences with the disease, the healthcare system, applied self-management strategies and their needs is considered crucial for developing a PD support program. Therefore, we aimed to explore the lived experiences and support needs of individuals with PD and their relatives in Germany. METHODS: This non-interventional, qualitative study conducted an explorative status quo and needs assessment. It generated knowledge through semi-structured focus groups and interviews with individuals with PD at various disease stages and their relatives. The interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using content analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-two individuals with PD and 29 relatives participated in eight focus groups and 13 paired and 13 individual interviews. Four themes with corresponding subthemes emerged: (1) experiences, revealing individuals' experiences around their diagnosis and with disease-specific care provision; (2) management support offers, clarifying who provides support and the type of support offered; (3) self-management, including comprehensibility, meaningfulness and manageability; and (4) future needs, differentiating between deficits and needs. Most participants expressed a sense of abandonment when obtaining self-management strategies and mastering their lives with PD, often referred to as 'life 2.0'. They identified the lack of structured and adequate provision of information, system orientation and social awareness. CONCLUSIONS: In Germany, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive PD care program that addresses the needs of individuals with PD and their relatives from the start of their care trajectory. It could assist individuals in gaining a comprehensive understanding of the disease, obtaining self-management strategies, building a support network, and becoming experts in self-managing their disease. Moreover, it may positively influence their care trajectory and reduce burdens, such as overburdening, fear of progression, and health anxiety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Studies Register ( https://www.drks.de/DRKS00030090 , No. DRKS00030090, Date of registration: 15.12.2022).


Assuntos
Família , Doença de Parkinson , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Autogestão , Humanos , Masculino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Doença de Parkinson/terapia , Doença de Parkinson/psicologia , Feminino , Autogestão/métodos , Autogestão/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Família/psicologia , Grupos Focais/métodos , Adulto , Gerenciamento Clínico , Avaliação das Necessidades , Apoio Social , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Cuidadores/psicologia , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde
2.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 99: 8-15, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35561498

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has been proven to alleviate motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease (PD). Regarding non-motor symptoms, however, inconsistencies have been reported, on whether DBS causes reductions in well-being and functioning. To assess motor and non-motor impairment in DBS-patients, the Deep Brain Stimulation Impairment Scale (DBS-IS) has been developed. Yet, the extent to which the DBS-IS detects impairment in DBS-patients and thus could serve as a useful tool that complements the PDQ-39 (gold standard) in assessment of well-being and functioning in PD-patients has not been shown. OBJECTIVES: By comparing DBS and non-DBS-patients we aimed to identify DBS-specific symptoms. We thereby aimed to show in how far the DBS-IS complements the PDQ-39 in assessing well-being and functioning in PD patients under DBS. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 186 DBS-patients were matched (for age, disease duration and sex) to 186 non-DBS-patients (N = 372) and the two groups were compared regarding well-being and functioning: Impairment was assessed via DBS-IS and overall Quality of Life (QoL) was assessed via PDQ-39. Additionally, we analyzed differences in impairment between age and disease duration clusters. RESULTS: DBS-patients showed significantly higher total impairment (DBS-IS) and significantly higher impairment on the subscales Postural Instability and Gait difficulties and speaking difficulties than non-DBS-patients. Impairment increased with age and disease duration and, overall, differences in impairment rose by age. Overall QoL (PDQ-39) was non-significantly lower in DBS-patients. CONCLUSION: Since there is evidence that the PDQ-39 misses some DBS-specific symptoms, the DBS-IS is recommended to complement the PDQ-39 when assessing DBS-patients.


Assuntos
Estimulação Encefálica Profunda , Doença de Parkinson , Núcleo Subtalâmico , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Doença de Parkinson/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Núcleo Subtalâmico/fisiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Parkinsons Dis ; 12(1): 361-370, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34602498

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Parkinsonian syndromes are heterogeneous chronic neurodegenerative disorders associated with both motor and non-motor symptoms. The symptoms have major psychosocial effects on the quality of life of patients and can be a burden for caregivers. So far, several questionnaires have been developed to assess quality of life in Parkinsonism, but none of these include the positive sides on well-being such as personal and social resilience factors. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to develop a digital framework for a longitudinal assessment of quality of life during the progression of Parkinson's disease. METHODS: The CHAPO model (Challenges and Potentials) has been established in a vast study by Wagner et al. to assess the quality of life of older people. This model includes environmental and individual factors, life chances, and life results, such as individual life evaluation, from a subjective as well as an objective point of view. Therefore, it has been adapted in several development steps to include the specific aspects that affect quality of life in Parkinsonian syndromes. The development process included 6 steps: definition, refinement, operationalization, piloting/debriefing, adjustment, and integration. RESULTS: The development of the CHAPO-PD model has been completed and it represents the first main result of this study. CONCLUSION: By taking a holistic understanding of quality of life into account, we expect to detect previously unrecognized factors, which correlate to the subjective well-being of Parkinson's disease patients, and aim to use these findings to improve the health care structures for patients with Parkinson's disease and related disorders.


Assuntos
Doença de Parkinson , Qualidade de Vida , Idoso , Cuidadores/psicologia , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
J Parkinsons Dis ; 10(3): 1087-1098, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32444563

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Optimal management in expert centers for Parkinson's disease (PD) usually involves pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, delivered by a multidisciplinary approach. However, there is no guideline specifying how this model should be organized. Consequently, the nature of multidisciplinary care varies widely. OBJECTIVE: To optimize care delivery, we aimed to provide recommendations for the organization of multidisciplinary care in PD. METHODS: Twenty expert centers in the field of multidisciplinary PD care participated. Their leading neurologists completed a survey covering eight themes: elements for optimal multidisciplinary care; team members; role of patients and care partners; team coordination; team meetings; inpatient versus outpatient care; telehealth; and challenges towards multidisciplinary care. During a consensus meeting, outcomes were incorporated into concept recommendations that were reviewed by each center's multidisciplinary team. Three patient organizations rated the recommendations according to patient priorities. Based on this feedback, a final set of recommendations (essential elements for delivery of multidisciplinary care) and considerations (desirable elements) was developed. RESULTS: We developed 30 recommendations and 10 considerations. The patient organizations rated the following recommendations as most important: care is organized in a patient-centered way; every newly diagnosed patient has access to a core multidisciplinary team; and each team has a coordinator. A checklist was created to further facilitate its implementation. CONCLUSION: We provide a practical tool to improve multidisciplinary care for persons with PD at the organizational level. Future studies should focus on implementing these recommendations in clinical practice, evaluating their potential applicability and effectiveness, and comparing alternative models of PD care.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Neurologistas , Doença de Parkinson/terapia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Preferência do Paciente , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Lista de Checagem , Consenso , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/organização & administração , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/normas , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Defesa do Paciente , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Centros de Atenção Terciária/organização & administração , Centros de Atenção Terciária/normas
5.
J Neurol ; 259(2): 251-60, 2012 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21750954

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to investigate whether visual assessment of (123)I-N-ω-fluoropropyl-2ß-carbomethoxy-3ß-(4-iodophenyl)nortropan ((123)I-FP-CIT) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in addition to quantitative analyses can help to differentiate idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) from atypical parkinsonian syndromes (APS). From a consecutive series of patients examined with (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT (n = 190) over a three-year period we identified 165 patients with a clinical diagnosis of PD (n = 120) or APS (n = 45). (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT results were analysed visually and quantitatively and compared for PD and APS and for the subgroup of patients with early PD and APS (disease duration <5 years). According to predefined visual patterns of dopaminergic degeneration the results were graded as normal (grade 5) or abnormal (grade 1-4), distinguishing a posterior-anterior degeneration pattern ("egg shape") from a global and severe degeneration pattern ("burst striatum"). Visual assessment of (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT showed significant different dopaminergic degeneration patterns for PD and APS patients. A grade 1 ("burst striatum") degeneration pattern was predominantly associated with APS patients. In contrast to that, a grade 2 (egg shape) degeneration pattern was the characteristic finding in PD patients. In a subgroup of patients with early disease, visual assessment with identification of the burst striatum degeneration pattern provided 90% positive predictive value and 99% specificity for the diagnosis of APS. Quantitative analysis of striatal binding ratios failed to depict these different degeneration patterns in PD and APS patients. Visual assessment of the pattern of dopaminergic loss in (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT shows different patterns of dopaminergic degeneration for PD and APS patients. Therefore, it could provide valuable information to distinguish APS from PD patients, especially in early stages of disease. Within the first 5 years of disease, the occurrence of a burst striatum degeneration pattern has a high positive predictive value of APS.


Assuntos
Neurônios Dopaminérgicos/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença de Parkinson/diagnóstico por imagem , Transtornos Parkinsonianos/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Encéfalo/patologia , Neurônios Dopaminérgicos/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Degeneração Neural/diagnóstico por imagem , Degeneração Neural/patologia , Doença de Parkinson/patologia , Transtornos Parkinsonianos/patologia , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único , Tropanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA