RESUMO
JNJ-10450232 (NTM-006) is a new molecular entity that is structurally related to acetaminophen. A comprehensive non-clinical safety program was conducted to support first-in-human and clinical efficacy studies based on preclinical data suggesting that the compound has comparable or enhanced antinociceptive and antipyretic efficacy without causing hepatotoxicity at supratherapeutic doses. No hepatic toxicity was noted in a mouse model sensitive to acetaminophen hepatotoxicity or in rats, dogs, and non-human primates in 28-day repeat dose toxicity studies at and above doses/exposures at which acetaminophen is known to cause hepatotoxicity. In the 28-day toxicity studies, all treatment-related findings were monitorable and reversible. Methemoglobinemia, which was observed in dogs and to a lesser extent in rats, is also observed with acetaminophen. This finding is considered not relevant to humans due to species differences in metabolism. Thyroid hypertrophy and hyperplasia were also observed in dogs and were shown to be a consequence of a species-specific UGT induction also demonstrated with increased thyroid hormone metabolism. Indirect bilirubin elevation was observed in rats as a result of UGT1A1 Inhibition. JNJ-10450232 (NTM-006) had no toxicologically relevant findings in safety pharmacology or genotoxicity studies. Together, these data supported progressing into safety and efficacy studies in humans.
RESUMO
Introduced in the 1950s, acetaminophen is one of the most widely used antipyretics and analgesics worldwide. In 1999, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) reviewed the epidemiologic studies of acetaminophen and the data were judged to be "inadequate" to conclude that it is carcinogenic. In 2019 the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment initiated a review process on the carcinogenic hazard potential of acetaminophen. To inform this review process, the authors performed a comprehensive literature search and identified 136 epidemiologic studies, which for most cancer types suggest no alteration in risk associated with acetaminophen use. For 3 cancer types, renal cell, liver, and some forms of lymphohematopoietic, some studies suggest an increased risk; however, multiple factors unique to acetaminophen need to be considered to determine if these results are real and clinically meaningful. The objective of this publication is to analyze the results of these epidemiologic studies using a framework that accounts for the inherent challenge of evaluating acetaminophen, including, broad population-wide use in multiple disease states, challenges with exposure measurement, protopathic bias, channeling bias, and recall bias. When evaluated using this framework, the data do not support a causal association between acetaminophen use and cancer.
Assuntos
Acetaminofen/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/induzido quimicamente , Causalidade , Humanos , Modelos BiológicosRESUMO
In 2020, the European Commission up-classified pure cobalt metal to a Category 1B hazard, based primarily on data from rodent inhalation carcinogenicity studies of metallic cobalt. The European Commission review did not evaluate cobalt-containing alloys in medical devices, which have very different properties vs. pure cobalt metal and did not include a systematic epidemiologic review. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published, peer-reviewed epidemiologic studies evaluating the association between overall cancer risk and exposure to orthopedic implants containing cobalt alloys or cobalt particulates in occupational settings. Study-specific estimates were pooled using random-effects models. Analyses included 20 papers on orthopedic implants and 10 occupational cohort papers (~1 million individuals). The meta-analysis summary estimates (95% confidence intervals) for overall cancer risk were 1.00 (0.96-1.04) overall and 0.97 (0.94-1.00) among high-quality studies. Results were also similar in analyses stratified by type of exposure/data sources (occupational cohort, implant registry or database), comparators (general or implant population), cancer incidence or mortality, follow-up duration (latency period), and study precision. In conclusion, meta-analysis found no association between exposure to orthopedic implants containing cobalt alloys or cobalt particulates in occupational settings and overall cancer risk, including an analysis of studies directly comparing metal-on-metal vs. non-metal-on-metal implants.
Assuntos
Ligas/química , Cobalto/análise , Equipamentos e Provisões , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Carcinogênese , Humanos , Prótese Articular , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Medição de Risco , Titânio/análiseRESUMO
In 2017, the European Union (EU) Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) recommended the classification of metallic cobalt (Co) as Category 1B with respect to its carcinogenic and reproductive hazard potential and Category 2 for mutagenicity but did not evaluate the relevance of these classifications for patients exposed to Co-containing alloys (CoCA) used in medical devices. CoCA are inherently different materials from Co metal from a toxicological perspective and thus require a separate assessment. CoCA are biocompatible materials with a unique combination of properties including strength, durability, and a long history of safe use that make them uniquely suited for use in a wide-range of medical devices. Assessments were performed on relevant preclinical and clinical carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity data for Co and CoCA to meet the requirements under the EU Medical Device Regulation triggered by the ECHA re-classification (adopted in October 2019 under the 14th Adaptation to Technical Progress to CLP) and to address their relevance to patient safety. The objective of this review is to present an integrated overview of these assessments, a benefit-risk assessment and an examination of potential alternative materials. The data support the conclusion that the exposure to CoCA in medical devices via clinically relevant routes does not represent a hazard for carcinogenicity or reproductive toxicity. Additionally, the risk for the adverse effects that are known to occur with elevated Co concentrations (e.g., cardiomyopathy) are very low for CoCA implant devices (infrequent reports often reflecting a unique catastrophic failure event out of millions of patients) and negligible for CoCA non-implant devices (not measurable/no case reports). In conclusion, the favorable benefit-risk profile also in relation to possible alternatives presented herein strongly support continued use of CoCA in medical devices.
Assuntos
Ligas/química , Cobalto/análise , Equipamentos e Provisões/normas , Doenças Genitais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Carcinogênese , União Europeia , Humanos , Próteses e Implantes/normas , Medição de Risco , Aço/análiseRESUMO
Cobalt (Co) alloys have been used for over seven decades in a wide range of medical devices, including, but not limited to, hip and knee implants, surgical tools, and vascular stents, due to their favorable biocompatibility, durability, and mechanical properties. A recent regulatory hazard classification review by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) resulted in the classification of metallic Co as a Class 1B Carcinogen (presumed to have carcinogenic potential for humans), primarily based on inhalation rodent carcinogenicity studies with pure metallic Co. The ECHA review did not specifically consider the carcinogenicity hazard potential of forms or routes of Co that are relevant for medical devices. The purpose of this review is to present a comprehensive assessment of the available in vivo preclinical data on the carcinogenic hazard potential of exposure to Co-containing alloys (CoCA) in medical devices by relevant routes. In vivo data were reviewed from 33 preclinical studies that examined the impact of Co exposure on local and systemic tumor incidence in rats, mice, guinea pigs, and hamsters. Across these studies, there was no significant increase of local or systemic tumors in studies relevant for medical devices. Taken together, the relevant in vivo data led to the conclusion that CoCA in medical devices are not a carcinogenic hazard in available in vivo models. While specific patient and implant factors cannot be fully replicated using in vivo models, the available in vivo preclinical data support that CoCA in medical devices are unlikely a carcinogenic hazard to patients.
Assuntos
Ligas/análise , Cobalto/análise , Equipamentos e Provisões , Ligas/administração & dosagem , Animais , Carcinogênese , Cobalto/administração & dosagem , HumanosRESUMO
In 2019, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment initiated a review of the carcinogenic hazard potential of acetaminophen, including an assessment of its genotoxicity. The objective of this analysis was to inform this review process with a weight-of-evidence assessment of more than 65 acetaminophen genetic toxicology studies that are of widely varying quality and conformance to accepted standards and relevance to humans. In these studies, acetaminophen showed no evidence of induction of point or gene mutations in bacterial and mammalian cell systems or in in vivo studies. In reliable, well-controlled test systems, clastogenic effects were only observed in unstable, p53-deficient cell systems or at toxic and/or excessively high concentrations that adversely affect cellular processes (e.g., mitochondrial respiration) and cause cytotoxicity. Across the studies, there was no clear evidence that acetaminophen causes DNA damage in the absence of toxicity. In well-controlled clinical studies, there was no meaningful evidence of chromosomal damage. Based on this weight-of-evidence assessment, acetaminophen overwhelmingly produces negative results (i.e., is not a genotoxic hazard) in reliable, robust high-weight studies. Its mode of action produces cytotoxic effects before it can induce the stable, genetic damage that would be indicative of a genotoxic or carcinogenic hazard.
Assuntos
Acetaminofen/análise , Animais , Carcinogênese , Ciclo Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Aberrações Cromossômicas/efeitos dos fármacos , Dano ao DNA/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Testes de Mutagenicidade , MutagênicosRESUMO
In 2019 California's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) initiated a review of the carcinogenic hazard potential of acetaminophen. In parallel with this review, herein we evaluated the mechanistic data related to the steps and timing of cellular events following therapeutic recommended (≤4 g/day) and higher doses of acetaminophen that may cause hepatotoxicity to evaluate whether these changes indicate that acetaminophen is a carcinogenic hazard. At therapeutic recommended doses, acetaminophen forms limited amounts of N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone-imine (NAPQI) without adverse cellular effects. Following overdoses of acetaminophen, there is potential for more extensive formation of NAPQI and depletion of glutathione, which may result in mitochondrial dysfunction and DNA damage, but only at doses that result in cell death - thus making it implausible for acetaminophen to induce the kind of stable, genetic damage in the nucleus indicative of a genotoxic or carcinogenic hazard in humans. The collective data demonstrate a lack of a plausible mechanism related to carcinogenicity and are consistent with rodent cancer bioassays, epidemiological results reviewed in companion manuscripts in this issue, as well as conclusions of multiple international health authorities.
Assuntos
Acetaminofen/toxicidade , Fenômenos Bioquímicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Carcinógenos/toxicidade , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas , Fígado/efeitos dos fármacos , Transdução de Sinais/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Fenômenos Bioquímicos/fisiologia , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/metabolismo , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/patologia , Dano ao DNA/efeitos dos fármacos , Dano ao DNA/fisiologia , Humanos , Fígado/metabolismo , Fígado/patologia , Transdução de Sinais/fisiologiaRESUMO
The fertility study design recommended in the ICH S5(R2) Harmonised Guideline for Detection of Toxicity to Reproduction for Medicinal Products emphasizes the importance of histopathological endpoints next to a pairing assessment in evaluating male fertility. However, in a male rat fertility study with JNJ-26489112, a CNS-active agent, while there were no effects on histological endpoints, mating performance or pregnancy outcomes, sperm assessment was included. The high dose males presented with reversible decreases in epididymal, but not testicular, sperm concentration and motility and an increase in abnormal sperm morphology. In view of the differences in fertility between rats and humans, these types of sperm effects in rats suggest the potential for an impact on human male fertility that would be undetected if not for the sperm assessment. Therefore, the current example suggests that including semenology as a standard endpoint in nonclinical fertility studies may be warranted.
Assuntos
Dioxanos/toxicidade , Fertilidade/efeitos dos fármacos , Espermatozoides/efeitos dos fármacos , Sulfonamidas/toxicidade , Testes de Toxicidade/métodos , Animais , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Guias como Assunto , Masculino , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Contagem de Espermatozoides , Motilidade dos Espermatozoides/efeitos dos fármacos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Opioid-induced androgen deficiency (OPIAD) affects patients treated with opioid analgesics. The norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (NRI) and µ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonist activities of tapentadol may result in tapentadol having less effect on serum androgen concentrations than analgesics acting through the MOR alone, such as morphine and oxycodone. The objectives of this publication are to 1) evaluate the effects of tapentadol (NUCYNTA and NUCYNTA extended release [ER]) on sex hormone concentrations in healthy male volunteers (vs placebo and morphine) and patients with osteoarthritis (vs placebo and oxycodone), and 2) present a mechanistic hypothesis explaining how the combined MOR agonist and NRI activities of tapentadol may result in less impact on androgen concentrations. METHODS: Three clinical studies were conducted: study 1 (single-dose comparison study vs morphine in healthy volunteers), study 2 (single-dose-escalation study in healthy volunteers without an active comparator), and study 3 (multiple-dose study vs oxycodone in patients with osteoarthritis). Studies 1 and 2 were conducted at medical research centers in Germany and the United Kingdom; study 3 was conducted at primary and secondary care centers and medical research centers in the United States. All three studies were randomized, double blind, and placebo controlled. Concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone (LH), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH; study 3 only) were evaluated at 6 and 24 hours postdose in studies 1 and 2, respectively, and at varying time points postdose in study 3. RESULTS: In study 1, mean serum total testosterone concentrations in healthy male volunteers were similar at baseline for all treatment periods; 6 hours after dosing, mean concentrations were comparable between placebo (8.6 nmol/L) and tapentadol immediate release (IR; 43 mg, 8.8 nmol/L; 86 mg, 9.3 nmol/L), but were lower following administration of morphine IR 30 mg (5.4 nmol/L). In study 2, there were no or minimal changes in testosterone in the therapeutic dose range with tapentadol IR (75-100 mg), and there was a modest decrease that appeared to level off in the supratherapeutic range (125-175 mg); mean testosterone and LH concentrations with all doses remained within normal ranges (testosterone, 4.56-28.2 nmol/L; LH, 2.9-4.6 U/L). In study 3, the decrease in the mean [standard deviation] testosterone concentration from baseline to endpoint for male patients receiving tapentadol ER (100 mg, -1.9 [0.71] nmol/L; 200 mg, -2.1 [0.93] nmol/L) was numerically smaller compared to oxycodone CR (20 mg, -2.7 [0.93] nmol/L), but higher compared to placebo (-0.3 [1.62] nmol/L). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that tapentadol, which has combined MOR and NRI activities, may have a lower impact on sex hormone concentrations than pure opioid analgesics, such as morphine or oxycodone. The data and mechanistic rationale presented herein provide a justification for conducting additional hypothesis testing studies, and are not intended to be used as a basis for clinical decision making. Future studies may help elucidate whether the observed trends are clinically significant and would translate into a reduced incidence of OPIAD.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante Humano/sangue , Hormônio Luteinizante/sangue , Morfina/efeitos adversos , Osteoartrite do Joelho/tratamento farmacológico , Oxicodona/efeitos adversos , Fenóis/efeitos adversos , Testosterona/sangue , Adolescente , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangue , Estudos Cross-Over , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Alemanha , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoartrite do Joelho/sangue , Osteoartrite do Joelho/diagnóstico , Medição de Risco , Tapentadol , Fatores de Tempo , Reino Unido , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
RWJ-800088 is a novel, potent polyethylene glycol (PEG)-conjugated thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetic that increases platelet levels and protects against thrombocytopenia. A nonclinical safety program was customized for this peptide that takes into account its protein-like structure, synthetic chemical nature, agonist pharmacologic activity, and mode of administration. In repeat-dose toxicity studies, the salient findings were dose-related increases in circulating platelet counts, mean platelet volume, and megakaryocytes in the bone marrow with no antibody formation. Reversible myelofibrosis and hyperostosis were observed in rats, but not dogs, when the circulating platelet levels exceeded 3× those of vehicle controls. The bone effects were due to the exaggerated pharmacologic effect and excessive stimulation and elevation of megakaryocytes by TPO, which results in intramedullary proliferation of fibroblasts and mesenchymal cells followed by osseous metaplasia. These findings support the use of platelet elevations of >3× as a stopping criterion to prevent potential adverse bone-related effects in humans.