Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lancet Oncol ; 25(8): e374-e387, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38821074

RESUMO

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown promise in patients with late-line refractory multiple myeloma, with response rates ranging from 73 to 98%. To date, three products have been approved: Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), which are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicines Agency, Health Canada (ide-cel only), and Brazil ANVISA (cilta-cel only); and equecabtagene autoleucel (eque-cel), which was approved by the Chinese National Medical Products Administration. CAR T-cell therapy is different from previous anti-myeloma therapeutics with unique toxic effects that require distinct mitigation strategies. Thus, a panel of experts from the International Myeloma Working Group was assembled to provide guidance for clinical use of CAR T-cell therapy in myeloma. This consensus opinion is from experts in the field of haematopoietic cell transplantation, cell therapy, and multiple myeloma therapeutics.


Assuntos
Consenso , Imunoterapia Adotiva , Mieloma Múltiplo , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Mieloma Múltiplo/imunologia , Humanos , Imunoterapia Adotiva/efeitos adversos , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos/imunologia , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfócitos T/uso terapêutico , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfócitos T/imunologia
2.
Pharmacoecon Open ; 6(4): 619-628, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35750956

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the healthcare resource use (HCRU) and associated costs of multiple myeloma (MM) using German claims data. METHODS: Anonymized claims data from one of the largest sickness funds in Germany were analyzed. Costs and HCRU were calculated from the perspective of the statutory health insurance. To analyze MM-associated incremental costs in a most recent calendar period for an overall MM population (31 March 2018-31 March 2019), a prevalent cohort of MM patients (continuously insured during 01 January 2010 until 31 March 2019 or death; two or more outpatient and/or one inpatient MM diagnoses [ICD-10: C90.0-] and alive on 31 March 2018) was compared with a control group (not diagnosed with MM) employing propensity-score matching. Additionally, to describe MM-associated HCRU and costs for treated patients per line of treatment (lot), a cohort of newly treated patients was considered (≥ 12 months' pre-index period without MM treatment). Therapy lines were determined based on observed days of medication supply, treatment switches, and treatment discontinuations. RESULTS: Overall, 2523 prevalent MM patients (52.0% female, mean age: 71.3 years) and 1673 newly treated MM patients (50.2% female, mean age: 73.0 years) met the selection criteria and were included in the analyses. After matching, a non-MM counterpart could be identified for 2474 prevalent out of 2523 MM patients. MM-associated incremental HCRU was characterized by an increased number of hospitalizations and a higher number of outpatient specialist visits (per patient-year [ppy] 0.48 additional hospitalizations and 3.80 additional specialist visits; p < 0.001), being also drivers of the associated total incremental add-on costs (15,381.09 € ppy, p < 0.001). Among newly treated patients, total direct costs ppy increased as patients received subsequent treatments (1st lot: 67,681,55 €; 4th lot+: 114,934.01 €), driven by outpatient MM prescriptions (1st lot: 28,692.32 €; 4th lot+: 62,980.72 €). CONCLUSION: The economic burden of MM is driven by outpatient prescriptions, inpatient hospitalizations, and outpatient specialist visits. Treatment and overall costs increase substantially when patients move to later lines of treatment.

3.
Blood Cancer J ; 12(2): 32, 2022 02 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35210399

RESUMO

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies are highly effective for multiple myeloma (MM) but their impressive efficacy is associated with treatment-related neurotoxicities in some patients. In CARTITUDE-1, 5% of patients with MM reported movement and neurocognitive treatment-emergent adverse events (MNTs) with ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a B-cell maturation antigen-targeted CAR T-cell therapy. We assessed the associated factors for MNTs in CARTITUDE-1. Based on common features, patients who experienced MNTs were characterized by the presence of a combination of at least two variables: high tumor burden, grade ≥2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or any grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) after cilta-cel infusion, and high CAR T-cell expansion/persistence. Strategies were implemented across the cilta-cel development program to monitor and manage patients with MNTs, including enhanced bridging therapy to reduce baseline tumor burden, early aggressive treatment of CRS and ICANS, handwriting assessments for early symptom detection, and extended monitoring/reporting time for neurotoxicity beyond 100 days post-infusion. After successful implementation of these strategies, the incidence of MNTs was reduced from 5% to <1% across the cilta-cel program, supporting its favorable benefit-risk profile for treatment of MM.


Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo , Síndromes Neurotóxicas , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Humanos , Imunoterapia Adotiva/efeitos adversos , Incidência , Mieloma Múltiplo/complicações , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/etiologia , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos/uso terapêutico
4.
Hemasphere ; 5(2): e524, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33880433

RESUMO

Since 2018, 2 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies received approval from the European Medicine Agency, with list prices around 320 000 Euro (€) (EUR) per treatment. These high prices raise concerns for patient access and the sustainability of healthcare systems. We aimed to estimate the costs and budget impact associated with CAR T-cell therapies for current and future indications in hematological cancers from 2019 to 2029. We focused on the former France, Germany, Spain, Italy and the United Kingdom (EU-5) and the Netherlands. We conducted a review of list prices, health technology assessment reports, budget impact analysis dossiers, and published cost-effectiveness analyses. We forecasted the 10-year health expenditures on CAR T-cells for several hematological cancers in selected European Union countries. Nine cost-effectiveness studies were identified and list prices for CAR T-cell therapies ranged between 307 200 EUR and 350 000 EUR. Estimated additional costs for pre- and post-treatment were 50 359 EUR per patient, whereas the incremental costs of CAR T-cell therapy (when compared with care as usual) ranged between 276 086 EUR and 328 727 EUR. We estimated market entry of CAR T-cell therapies for chronic mantle cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, multiple myeloma, and acute myeloid leukemia in 2021, 2022, 2022, 2022, and 2025, respectively. Cumulative expenditure estimates for existing and future indications from 2019 to 2029 were on average 28.5 billion EUR, 32.8 billion EUR, and 28.9 billion EUR when considering CAR T-cell therapy costs only, CAR T-cell therapy costs including pre- and post-treatment, and incremental CAR T-cell therapy costs, respectively. CAR T-cell therapies seem to be promising treatment options for hematological cancers but the financial burden on healthcare systems in the former EU-5 and the Netherlands will contribute to a substantial rise in healthcare expenditure in the field of hematology.

5.
Br J Haematol ; 194(3): 496-507, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33724461

RESUMO

In this review, two types of soft-tissue involvement in multiple myeloma are defined: (i) extramedullary (EMD) with haematogenous spread involving only soft tissues and (ii) paraskeletal (PS) with tumour masses arising from skeletal lesions. The incidence of EMD and PS plasmacytomas at diagnosis ranges from 1·7% to 4·5% and 7% to 34·4% respectively. EMD disease is often associated with high-risk cytogenetics, resistance to therapy and worse prognosis than in PS involvement. In patients with PS involvement a proteasome inhibitor-based regimen may be the best option followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in transplant eligible patients. In patients with EMD disease who are not eligible for ASCT, a proteasome inhibitor-based regimen such as lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVD) may be the best option, while for those eligible for high-dose therapy a myeloma/lymphoma-like regimen such as bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTD)-RVD/cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (PACE) followed by SCT should be considered. In both EMD and PS disease at relapse many strategies have been tried, but this remains a high-unmet need population.


Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Plasmocitoma/terapia , Animais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Bortezomib/uso terapêutico , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Gerenciamento Clínico , Doxorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Etoposídeo/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Lenalidomida/uso terapêutico , Mieloma Múltiplo/complicações , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiplo/patologia , Plasmocitoma/complicações , Plasmocitoma/diagnóstico , Plasmocitoma/patologia , Prognóstico , Transplante Autólogo
6.
Blood Adv ; 2(16): 2159-2175, 2018 08 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30154125

RESUMO

Patients treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are at risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and disease, which results in increased morbidity and mortality. Although universal antiviral prophylaxis against CMV improves outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients, data have been conflicting regarding such prophylaxis in patients undergoing allogeneic HCT. We conducted a systematic review of randomized trials of prophylactic antivirals against CMV after allogeneic HCT to summarize the evolution of the field over the last 35 years and evaluate the prophylactic potential of antiviral agents against CMV after allogeneic HCT. Electronic databases were queried from database inception through 31 December 2017. For included studies, incidence of CMV infection and all-cause mortality were collected as primary outcomes; CMV disease incidence, use of preemptive therapy, and drug toxicities were collected as secondary outcomes. Nineteen clinical trials conducted between 1981 and 2017 involving a total of 4173 patients were included for review. Prophylactic strategies included use of acyclovir, valacyclovir, ganciclovir, maribavir, brincidofovir, and letermovir compared with placebo or a comparator antiviral. Fourteen trials that compared antiviral prophylaxis with placebo demonstrated overall effectiveness in reducing incidence of CMV infection (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.58), CMV disease (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.40-0.80), and use of preemptive therapy (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.42-0.62; 6 trials); however, none demonstrated reduction in all-cause mortality (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.78-1.18) except the phase 3 trial of letermovir (week-24 OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.98). Additional research is warranted to determine patient groups most likely to benefit from antiviral prophylaxis and its optimal deployment after allogeneic HCT.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/prevenção & controle , Citomegalovirus , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Aloenxertos , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/economia , Humanos
7.
Expert Rev Hematol ; 10(10): 933-939, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28885063

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) face poor treatment options by the time third-line therapy is required, despite advances in overall survival in recent years. Treatment free interval (TFI) and opportunities to maintain quality of life (QoL) have been cited as additional measures of efficacy that can be utilized in personalized treatment decisions. METHODS: The clinical health outcomes data from PANORAMA-1, the pivotal phase-3 trial comparing panobinostat-bortezomib-dexamethasone (PAN-BTZ-DEX) with placebo (PBO)-BTZ-DEX in RRMM patients treated with 1 to 3 prior regimens, retrospectively assessed TFI as a health outcome measure and metric of patient treatment experience relevant to the RRMM population. RESULTS: PAN-BTZ-DEX shows promise for prolonged TFI (mean TFI, 7.49 months; 95% CI, 6.02 to 8.71) compared to PBO-BTZ-DEX (mean TFI, 3.86 months; 95% CI, 3.08 to 4.60) for heavily pre-treated advanced RRMM patients), due to the short duration of therapy and extended progression free-survival. Further, QoL during the TFI was similar to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: PAN-BTZ-DEX provides a treatment regimen with prolonged TFI benefits previously not available for RRMM patients. TFI has not been traditionally measured in clinical trials, but should be assessed in prospective data collection given its value to payers, providers, and patients.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Histona Desacetilases/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Hidroxâmicos/uso terapêutico , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiplo/patologia , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Bortezomib/administração & dosagem , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Esquema de Medicação , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Inibidores de Histona Desacetilases/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Histona Desacetilases/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Ácidos Hidroxâmicos/administração & dosagem , Ácidos Hidroxâmicos/efeitos adversos , Indóis/administração & dosagem , Indóis/efeitos adversos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Panobinostat , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Recidiva , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 22(11): 1988-1996, 2016 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27590108

RESUMO

Although generally not applied as first-line treatment of multiple myeloma, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-SCT) can still be chosen as ultimate escalation approach in high-risk patients, preferentially within the framework of clinical trials. In this study, we investigated whether decreasing donor chimerism (DC) is predictive for relapse. In addition, we comprehensively determined the impact of several other disease- and treatment-related factors on outcome. One hundred fifty-five multiple myeloma patients whose DC status was followed serially by the short tandem repeat-based techniques at a single lab were included in this retrospective study. Outcome variables were studied in univariate and multivariable analyses. Available were 2.324 DC samples (median, 12 per patient). Loss of full DC was associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.6) but did not impact overall survival. Two-thirds of patients with International Myeloma Working Group-defined relapses still displayed a full DC in peripheral blood or bone marrow. Extramedullary manifestations were observed in 33% of patients, accounting for the discrepancy between DC analysis and the actual disease status. In multivariable analysis, the 2 most relevant variables for an unfavorable PFS were progressive disease before allo-SCT (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.5 to 5.9) and allo-SCT at least the second relapse (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.5 to 4.9), whereas for overall survival progressive disease or partial response before allo-SCT had the strongest negative effects (HR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.9 to 9, and HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.8, respectively). Adverse cytogenetics such as del17p, t(4,14) or amp(1q21) were not associated with shorter survival after allo-SCT. Extensive DC sampling beyond robust engraftment does not appear to provide additional information helpful for disease management in most patients and is challenged by a significant incidence of extramedullary disease. In our series, allo-SCT overcame unfavorable cytogenetics.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Adulto , Quimerismo , Citogenética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Repetições de Microssatélites/genética , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Mieloma Múltiplo/patologia , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Transplante Homólogo
9.
Blood ; 125(13): 2068-74, 2015 03 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25628469

RESUMO

We conducted a pooled analysis of 869 individual newly diagnosed elderly patient data from 3 prospective trials. At diagnosis, a geriatric assessment had been performed. An additive scoring system (range 0-5), based on age, comorbidities, and cognitive and physical conditions, was developed to identify 3 groups: fit (score = 0, 39%), intermediate fitness (score = 1, 31%), and frail (score ≥2, 30%). The 3-year overall survival was 84% in fit, 76% in intermediate-fitness (hazard ratio [HR], 1.61; P = .042), and 57% in frail (HR, 3.57; P < .001) patients. The cumulative incidence of grade ≥3 nonhematologic adverse events at 12 months was 22.2% in fit, 26.4% in intermediate-fitness (HR, 1.23; P = .217), and 34.0% in frail (HR, 1.74; P < .001) patients. The cumulative incidence of treatment discontinuation at 12 months was 16.5% in fit, 20.8% in intermediate-fitness (HR, 1.41; P = .052), and 31.2% in frail (HR, 2.21; P < .001) patients. Our frailty score predicts mortality and the risk of toxicity in elderly myeloma patients. The International Myeloma Working group proposes this score for the measurement of frailty in designing future clinical trials. These trials are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01093136 (EMN01), #NCT01190787 (26866138MMY2069), and #NCT01346787 (IST-CAR-506).


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Idoso Fragilizado , Avaliação Geriátrica , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Prognóstico , Suspensão de Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
Semin Hematol ; 49(1): 10-4, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22221780

RESUMO

Even though the overall outcome after allogeneic transplant has improved significantly in the last decades, late infectious diseases are still the most important causes of late morbidity and mortality. Here, impaired immune reconstitution and therapy of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) represent the major risk factors. In this review, we give a comprehensive overview of late infectious complications and summarize possible diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to prevent these complications.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Infecções , Infecções/complicações , Sobreviventes , Doença Crônica , Análise Custo-Benefício , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/complicações , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/economia , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/terapia , Humanos , Infecções/diagnóstico , Infecções/terapia , Fatores de Tempo , Transplante Homólogo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA