Biochemical Assessment of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma.

Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) require prompt consideration and efficient diagnosis and treatment to minimize associated morbidity and mortality. Once considered, appropriate biochemical testing is key to diagnosis. Advances in understanding catecholamine metabolism have clarified why measurements of the O-methylated catecholamine metabolites rather than the catecholamines themselves are important for effective diagnosis. These metabolites, normetanephrine and metanephrine, produced respectively from norepinephrine and epinephrine, can be measured in plasma or urine, with choice according to available methods or presentation of patients. For patients with signs and symptoms of catecholamine excess, either test will invariably establish the diagnosis, whereas the plasma test provides higher sensitivity than urinary metanephrines for patients screened due to an incidentaloma or genetic predisposition, particularly for small tumors or in patients with an asymptomatic presentation. Additional measurements of plasma methoxytyramine can be important for some tumors, such as paragangliomas, and for surveillance of patients at risk of metastatic disease. Avoidance of false-positive test results is best achieved by plasma measurements with appropriate reference intervals and preanalytical precautions, including sampling blood in the fully supine position. Follow-up of positive results, including optimization of preanalytics for repeat tests or whether to proceed directly to anatomic imaging or confirmatory clonidine tests, depends on the test results, which can also suggest likely size, adrenal vs extra-adrenal location, underlying biology, or even metastatic involvement of a suspected tumor. Modern biochemical testing now makes diagnosis of PPGL relatively simple. Integration of artificial intelligence into the process should make it possible to fine-tune these advances.

Adverse drug reactions in patients with phaeochromocytoma: incidence, prevention and management.

The dangers of phaeochromocytomas are mainly due to the capability of these neuroendocrine tumours to secrete large quantities of vasoactive catecholamines, thereby increasing blood pressure and causing other related adverse events or complications. Phaeochromocytomas are often missed, sometimes only becoming apparent during therapeutic interventions that provoke release or interfere with the disposition of catecholamines produced by the tumours. Because phaeochromocytomas are rare, evidence contraindicating use of specific drugs is largely anecdotal or based on case reports. The heterogeneous nature of the tumours also makes adverse reactions highly variable among patients. Some drugs, such as dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists (e.g. metoclopramide, veralipride) and beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists (beta-blockers) clearly carry high potential for adverse reactions, while others such as tricyclic antidepressants seem more inconsistent in producing complications. Other drugs capable of causing adverse reactions include monoamine oxidase inhibitors, sympathomimetics (e.g. ephedrine) and certain peptide and corticosteroid hormones (e.g. corticotropin, glucagon and glucocorticoids). Risks associated with contraindicated medications are easily minimised by adoption of appropriate safeguards (e.g. adrenoceptor blockade). Without such precautions, the state of cardiovascular vulnerability makes some drugs and manipulations employed during surgical anaesthesia particularly dangerous. Problems arise most often when drugs or therapeutic procedures are employed in patients in whom the tumour is not suspected. In such cases, it is extremely important for the clinician to recognise the possibility of an underlying catecholamine-producing tumour and to take the most appropriate steps to manage and treat adverse events and clinical complications.

Is supine rest necessary before blood sampling for plasma metanephrines?

BACKGROUND: The impact of blood sampling in sitting vs supine positions on measurements of plasma metanephrines for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma is unknown. METHODS: We compared plasma concentrations of free metanephrines in samples from patients with primary hypertension obtained after supine rest with those obtained in the sitting position without preceding rest. We also assessed the effects on diagnostic test performance retrospectively in patients with and without pheochromocytoma, and we calculated cost-effectiveness for pheochromocytoma testing. RESULTS: Upper reference limits of plasma free metanephrines were higher in samples obtained from seated patients without preceding rest than from supine patients with preceding rest. Application of these higher upper reference limits to samples from supine patients with pheochromocytoma decreased the diagnostic sensitivity from 99% to 96%. In patients without pheochromocytoma, adjusting the plasma concentration for the effects of sitting while preserving the 99% sensitivity by use of the supine upper reference limits increased the number of false-positive test results from 9% to 25%. CONCLUSIONS: To preserve high diagnostic sensitivity we recommend the use of upper reference limits determined from blood samples collected in the supine position. Under these conditions, negative test results for blood samples obtained with patients sitting are as effective for ruling out pheochromocytoma as negative results from samples obtained after supine rest. Repeat testing with samples obtained in the supine position offers a cost-effective approach for dealing with the increased numbers of false-positive results expected after initial sampling in the sitting position.

Sympathetic nerve function--assessment by radioisotope dilution analysis.

Radioisotope dilution measurements of norepinephrine spillover (rate of entry of the transmitter into plasma) provide more accurate assessments of sympathoneural transmitter release than allowed by measurements of plasma catecholamine concentrations alone. Measurements of total body norepinephrine spillover, as an index of global sympathetic outflow, allow effects on plasma clearance to be distinguished from effects on release of catecholamines into plasma, while spillovers from specific tissues enable examination of regionalized sympathetic responses. However, spillovers of norepinephrine represent only a fraction of the transmitter that escapes neuronal and extraneuronal uptake after release by nerves. Numerous factors may influence this fraction and measures spillovers independently of transmitter release by nerves. Modified radioisotope dilution methods for assessment of rate processes operating within and between intracellular and extracellular compartments have further improved our understanding of the relationships of norepinephrine release, uptake, spillover, turnover, and metabolism. This article reviews the breadth of information about sympathetic nerve function attainable using catecholamine radioisotope dilution analyses against a backdrop of the relative advantages and methodological limitations associated with the methodology.