Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 49(2): 867-874, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36264307

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Currently used classification systems and measurement methods are insufficient to assess fracture displacement. In this study, a novel 3D measure for fracture displacement is introduced and associated with risk on conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional study was performed including 997 patients treated for a tibial plateau fracture between 2003 and 2018. All patients were contacted for follow-up and 534 (54%) responded. For all patients, the 3D gap area was determined in order to quantify the degree of initial fracture displacement. A cut-off value was determined using ROC curves. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the association of 3D gap area with conversion to TKA. Subgroups with increasing levels of 3D gap area were identified, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to assess survivorship of the knee free from conversion to TKA. RESULTS: A total of 58 (11%) patients underwent conversation to TKA. An initial 3D gap area ≥ 550 mm2 was independently associated with conversion to TKA (HR 8.4; p = 0.001). Four prognostic groups with different ranges of the 3D gap area were identified: excellent (0-150 mm2), good (151-550 mm2), moderate (551-1000 mm2), and poor (> 1000 mm2). Native knee survival at 10-years follow-up was 96%, 95%, 76%, and 59%, respectively, in the excellent, good, moderate, and poor group. CONCLUSION: A novel 3D measurement method was developed to quantify initial fracture displacement of tibial plateau fractures. 3D fracture assessment adds to current classification methods, identifies patients at risk for conversion to TKA at follow-up, and could be used for patient counselling about prognosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Fraturas da Tíbia , Fraturas do Planalto Tibial , Humanos , Seguimentos , Estudos Transversais , Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 36(3): 713-723, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33844164

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) is a noninvasive spectroscopy technique for determining superficial tissue oxygenation. The HyperView™ system is a hand-held camera that enables perfusion image acquisition. The evaluation of superficial tissue oxygenation is warranted in the evaluation of patients with peripheral arterial disease. The aim was to determine the reliability of repeated HSI measurements. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, HSI was performed on 50 healthy volunteers with a mean age of 26.4 ± 2.5 years, at the lower extremity. Two independent observers performed HSI during two subsequent measurement sessions. Short term test-retest reliability and intra- and inter-observer reliability were determined, and generalizability and decision studies were performed. Transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) measurements were also performed. RESULTS: The short term test-retest reliability was good for the HSI values determined at the lower extremity, ranging from 0.72 to 0.90. Intra- and inter-observer reliability determined at different days were poor to moderate for both HSI (0.24 to 0.71 and 0.30 to 0.58, respectively) and TcPO2 (0.54 and 0.56, and 0.51 and 0.31, respectively). Reliability can be increased to >0.75 by averaging two measurements on different days. CONCLUSION: This study showed good short term test-retest reliability for HSI measurements, however low intra- and inter-observer reliability was observed for tissue oxygenation measurements with both HSI and TcPO2 performed at separate days in young healthy volunteers. Reliability of HSI can be improved when determined as a mean of two measurements taken on different days.


Assuntos
Imageamento Hiperespectral , Extremidade Inferior , Adulto , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Adulto Jovem
3.
BMJ Open ; 10(7): e035370, 2020 07 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32624472

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost effectiveness of a reduced imaging follow-up protocol of distal radius fractures compared with usual care. DESIGN: An economical evaluation conducted alongside a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT). SETTING: Four level-one trauma centres in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 341 patients participated (usual care (n=172), reduced imaging (n=169)). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomised to usual care (routine radiography at 1, 2, 6 and 12 weeks) or a reduced imaging strategy (radiographs at 6 and 12 weeks only for a clinical indication). OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional outcome was assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) using the EuroQol-5Dimensions-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L). Costs were measured using self-reported questionnaires and medical records, and analysed from a societal perspective. Multiple imputation, seemingly unrelated regression analysis and bootstrapping were used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Clinical overall outcomes of both groups were comparable. The difference in DASH was -2.03 (95% CI -4.83 to 0.77) and the difference in QALYs was 0.025 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.06). Patients in the reduced imaging group received on average 3.3 radiographs (SD: 1.9) compared with 4.2 (SD: 1.9) in the usual care group. Costs for radiographic imaging were significantly lower in the reduced imaging group than in the usual care group (€-48 per patient, 95% CI -68 to -27). There was no difference in total costs between groups (€-401 per patient, 95% CI -2453 to 1251). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for QALYs was -15 872; the ICER for the DASH was 198. The probability of reduced imaging being cost effective compared with usual care ranged from 0.8 to 0.9 at a willingness to pay of €20 000/QALY to €80 000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a reduced imaging strategy in the follow-up of distal radius fractures has a high probability of being cost effective for QALYs, without decreasing functional outcome. We, therefore, recommend imaging only when clinically indicated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The Netherlands trial register (NL4477).


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Radiografia/economia , Radiografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Fraturas do Rádio/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Radiografia/normas , Fraturas do Rádio/diagnóstico , Autorrelato , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Clin Rehabil ; 33(5): 923-935, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30722686

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess test-retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness of the Dutch Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA-NL) in patients who sustained acute physical trauma. DESIGN: A longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: A level 1 trauma center in The Netherlands. SUBJECTS: Patients who required hospital admission after sustaining an acute physical trauma. INTERVENTION: Patients completed the SMFA-NL at six weeks, eight weeks and six months post-injury. MAIN MEASURE: The measures used were The Dutch Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment. Test-retest reliability (between six and eight weeks post-injury) using intraclass correlation coefficients, the smallest detectable change and Bland and Altman plots. Construct validity (six weeks post-injury) and responsiveness (between six weeks and six months post-injury) were evaluated using the hypothesis testing method. RESULTS: A total of 248 patients (mean age: 46.5, SD: 13.4) participated, 145 patients completed the retest questionnaires (eight weeks) and 160 patients completed the responsiveness questionnaires (six months). The intraclass correlation coefficients indicated good to excellent reliability on all subscales (0.80 to 0.98). The smallest detectable change was 17.4 for the Upper Extremity Dysfunction subscale, 11.0 for the Lower Extremity Dysfunction subscales, 13.9 for the Problems with Daily Activities subscale and 16.5 for the Mental and Emotional Problems subscale. At group level, the smallest detectable change ranged from 1.48 to 1.96. A total of 86% of the construct validity hypotheses and 79% of the responsiveness hypotheses were confirmed. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the SMFA-NL has good to excellent reliability, sufficient construct validity and is able to detect change in physical function over time.


Assuntos
Avaliação da Deficiência , Extremidade Inferior/fisiopatologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Extremidade Superior/fisiopatologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/fisiopatologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
5.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 45(1): 131-138, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29285612

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Despite a rising incidence in proximal humeral fractures, there is still no evidence for the best treatment option, especially for elderly patients. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL), functional outcome, pain and social participation in elderly patients, after operative and nonoperative treatment of displaced 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures. METHODS: 150 patients aged ≥ 65, treated for a displaced 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fracture between 2004 and 2014, were invited to participate. Eventually 91 patients (61%) participated, of which 32 non-operatively treated patients were matched to 32 of the 59 operatively treated patients by propensity score matching. The EQ-5D, DASH, VAS for pain and WHODAS 2.0 Participation in Society domain were administered. Complications and reinterventions were registered. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the two treatment groups in HRQoL (p = 0.43), function (p = 0.78) and pain (p = 0.19). A trend toward better social participation in the operative group (p = 0.09) was found. More complications and reinterventions occurred in the operative group than the nonoperative group, with 9 versus 5 complications (p = 0.37) and 8 versus 2 reinterventions (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found no evidence of a difference in HRQoL, functional outcome or pain 1-10 years after operative or nonoperative treatment in patients of 65 and older with a displaced 3- or 4-part humeral fracture. Operatively treated patients showed a trend toward better social participation but also higher reintervention rates.


Assuntos
Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Fraturas do Ombro/terapia , Idoso , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Avaliação Geriátrica , Humanos , Masculino , Países Baixos , Medição da Dor , Pontuação de Propensão , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Participação Social , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Trials ; 16: 66, 2015 Feb 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25872504

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Extremity fractures such as wrist and ankle fractures are a common and costly healthcare problem. The management of these fractures depends on fracture type and loss of congruity of the joint, resulting in cast immobilization or operative treatment. Loss of congruity or displacement leading to uneven joint loading, osteoarthritis and an increased probability of a poor functional outcome should be identified within the first 2 weeks post-trauma, based upon radiographs to determine optimal treatment. After this period, routine radiographs are scheduled for monitoring the bone-healing process. Current protocols describe imaging at 1, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post-trauma. However, it is questionable whether routine radiography following the initial follow-up ( 2-weeks post-trauma) is cost effective. The aim of this study is to determine whether a modification of the radiographic follow-up protocol can be conducted with no worse outcome and less cost than the current standard of care for patients with a wrist or ankle fracture. METHODS/DESIGN: In a multicenter randomized controlled trial, 697 patients aged 18 years or older will be included: 385 wrist fracture- and 312 ankle fracture patients. Patients will be randomized into two groups: Group 1 receives usual care, consisting of radiographs 1, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post-trauma; Group 2 receives radiographs beyond the initial follow-up only when clinically indicated. The primary outcome is the overall extremity-specific function. For wrist fractures, this includes the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score; for the ankle fractures, this includes the Olerud and Molander ankle score. Secondary outcomes include: healthcare cost, the specific function measured with the Patient Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation for wrist fractures and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons foot and ankle questionnaire for ankle fractures, pain-intensity, health-related quality of life, self-perceived recovery, and complications. Both groups will be monitored at 1, 2, and 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months. DISCUSSION: This study will provide data on (cost) effectiveness of routine radiography in the follow-up of wrist and ankle fractures, and could pave the way for a change in (inter)national protocols. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NTR4610 , registration date 22 June 2014.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Tornozelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Artrografia/métodos , Traumatismos do Punho/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Tornozelo/economia , Fraturas do Tornozelo/fisiopatologia , Fraturas do Tornozelo/terapia , Artrografia/economia , Protocolos Clínicos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Avaliação da Deficiência , Consolidação da Fratura , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Países Baixos , Medição da Dor , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Qualidade de Vida , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Projetos de Pesquisa , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Traumatismos do Punho/economia , Traumatismos do Punho/fisiopatologia , Traumatismos do Punho/terapia
7.
Injury ; 43(6): 726-33, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21851940

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the Dutch version of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA-NL) and to investigate the internal consistency, validity, repeatability and responsiveness of the translated version. The original SMFA was first translated and culturally adapted from English into Dutch according to a standardised procedure and subsequently tested for clinimetric quality. The study population consisted of 162 patients treated for various musculoskeletal injuries or disorders at the departments of Orthopedics and Traumatology. All respondents filled in the SMFA-NL and the SF-36 and a region-specific questionnaire. To determine repeatability, 87 respondents filled in the SMFA-NL for a second time after a time interval of three to four weeks. To determine responsiveness, 29 respondents who were treated for their injury within three months before the first assessment filled in the SMFA-NL for a second time after two to three months. The following analyses were performed to evaluate clinimetric quality of the SMFA-NL: factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha (internal consistency), floor and ceiling effects, Spearman's Rho (construct validity), intraclass correlation coefficients and the Bland & Altman method (repeatability), and standardised response means (SRM) (responsiveness). Factor analysis demonstrated four subscales of the SMFA-NL. Both the newly identified subscales of the SMFA-NL and the conventional subscales of the SMFA showed good internal consistency. No floor and some ceiling effects were found. Construct validity was good, as high correlations were found between the subscales of the SMFA-NL and the respective subscales of the SF-36 and the region-specific questionnaires. Repeatability of the SMFA-NL subscales was high, with no systematic bias between first and second assessment. Responsiveness of the SMFA-NL was moderate, as small to moderate SRMs were found. We successfully translated and culturally adapted a Dutch version of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SFMA-NL). This study shows that the SMFA-NL is a valid, reliable and moderately responsive method for the assessment of functional status of patients who have a broad range of musculoskeletal disorders. Furthermore, it will allow for comparison between different patient groups as well as for cross-cultural comparisons.


Assuntos
Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Traduções , Adulto , Idoso , Comparação Transcultural , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/psicologia , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Tradução
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA