New Approaches to Assessment and Management of Tricuspid Regurgitation Before Intervention.

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a progressive condition associated with substantial morbidity, poor quality of life, and increased mortality. Patients with TR commonly have coexisting conditions including congestive heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, chronic lung disease, atrial fibrillation, and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices, which can increase the complexity of medical and surgical TR management. As such, the optimal timing of referral for isolated tricuspid valve (TV) intervention is undefined, and TV surgery has been associated with elevated risk of morbidity and mortality. More recently, an unprecedented growth in TR treatment options, namely the development of a wide range of transcatheter TV interventions (TTVI) is stimulating increased interest and referral for TV intervention across the entire medical community. However, there are no stepwise algorithms for the optimal management of symptomatic severe TR before TTVI. This article reviews the contemporary assessment and management of TR with addition of a medical framework to optimize TR before referral for TTVI.

Performance of Echocardiographic Algorithms for Assessment of High Aortic Bioprosthetic Valve Gradients.

BACKGROUND: Bioprosthetic aortic valve dysfunction (BAVD) is a challenging diagnosis. Commonly used algorithms to classify high-gradient BAVD are the 2009 American Society of Echocardiography, 2014 Blauwet-Miller, and 2016 European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging algorithms. We sought (1) to evaluate the accuracy of existing algorithms against objectively proven BAVD and (2) to propose an improved algorithm. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 266 patients with objectively proven BAVD (pathology of explanted valves, four-dimensional computed tomography prior to transcatheter valve-in-valve replacement, or therapeutically confirmed bioprosthetic thrombosis) who were treated. Of those, 191 had obstruction, 48 had regurgitation, 15 had mixed stenosis and regurgitation, and 12 had patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM). Normal controls were matched 1:1 (age, prosthesis size, and type), of which 43 had high gradients (PPM in 30, high flow in nine, and normal prosthesis in nine). Algorithm assignment was based on the echocardiogram leading to BAVD diagnosis and the predischarge "fingerprint" echocardiogram after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. A novel algorithm (Mayo Clinic algorithm) incorporating valve appearance in addition to Doppler parameters was developed to improve observed deficiencies. RESULTS: The accuracy of existing algorithms was suboptimal (2009 American Society of Echocardiography, 62%; 2014 Blauwet-Miller, 62%; 2016 European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, 57%). The most common overdiagnosis was PPM (22%-29% of patients and controls with high gradients). The novel Mayo Clinic algorithm correctly identified the mechanism in 256 of 307 patients and controls (83%). Recognition of regurgitation was substantially improved (42 of 47 patients, 89%), and the number of PPM misdiagnoses was significantly reduced (five patients). CONCLUSION: Currently recommended algorithms misclassify a significant number of BAVD patients. The accuracy was improved by a newly proposed algorithm.

Temporal Incidence and Predictors of High-Grade Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Background The temporal incidence of high-grade atrioventricular block (HAVB) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is uncertain. As a result, periprocedural monitoring and pacing strategies remain controversial. This study aimed to describe the temporal incidence of initial episode of HAVB stratified by pre- and post-TAVR conduction and identify predictors of delayed events. Methods and Results Consecutive patients undergoing TAVR at a single center between February 2012 and June 2019 were retrospectively assessed for HAVB within 30 days. Patients with prior aortic valve replacement, permanent pacemaker (PPM), or conversion to surgical replacement were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess predictors of delayed HAVB (initial event >24 hours post-TAVR). A total of 953 patients were included in this study. HAVB occurred in 153 (16.1%). After exclusion of those with prophylactic PPM placed post-TAVR, the incidence of delayed HAVB was 33/882 (3.7%). Variables independently associated with delayed HAVB included baseline first-degree atrioventricular block or right bundle-branch block, self-expanding valve, and new left bundle-branch block. Forty patients had intraprocedural transient HAVB, including 16 who developed HAVB recurrence and 6 who had PPM implantation without recurrence. PPM was placed for HAVB in 130 (13.6%) (self-expanding valve, 23.7% versus balloon-expandable valve, 11.9%; P<0.001). Eight (0.8%) patients died by 30 days, including 1 unexplained without PPM present. Conclusions Delayed HAVB occurs with higher frequency in patients with baseline first-degree atrioventricular block or right bundle-branch block, new left bundle-branch block, and self-expanding valve. These findings provide insight into optimal monitoring and pacing strategies based on periprocedural ECG findings.

Assessment of left ventricular filling pressure with Doppler velocities across the patent foramen ovale.

BACKGROUND: The utility of Doppler velocities across the patent foramen ovale (PFO) to estimate left ventricular (LV) filling pressure is not well known. METHODS: The best cut-off value of peak interatrial septal velocity across a transeptal puncture site measured by transesophageal echocardiography for estimating high mean left atrial (LA) pressure (≥ 15 mmHg) was determined in 17 patients. This cut-off value was subsequently applied to 67 patients with a PFO undergoing transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for assessing the value of PFO velocity in determining LV filling pressure. RESULTS: The peak systolic interatrial septal velocities significantly correlated with directly measured mean LA pressures during transcatheter mitral valve procedure (r = 0.77, P < 0.001). The best cut-off value was 1.7 m/s for predicting high LA pressure (AUC 0.91; sensitivity 90%, specificity 86%). When this cut-off was applied to patients undergoing TTE, peak PFO velocity ≥ 1.7 m/s correlated with reduced e', higher E/e', and higher tricuspid regurgitation velocity (P < 0.01). LV filling pressure according to the 2016 diastolic guideline was compared with peak PFO velocity in 51 patients. Among patients with high filling pressure according to the guidelines (n = 20), peak PFO velocity ≥ 1.7 m/s was present in 60% of patients. In patients with normal filling pressure per the guidelines (n = 31), PFO velocity < 1.7 m/s was present 84%. Sensitivity and specificity were 75% and 92%, respectively, in patients with sinus rhythm, but were only 50% and 57%, respectively, among patients with atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: Doppler-derived peak PFO velocities could be valuable in the assessment of increased LV filling pressure using 1.7 m/s as the cut-off value.

Assessment and management of aortic valve disease in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

The onset of symptoms or left ventricular systolic dysfunction heralds a poor prognosis for patients with either aortic stenosis or aortic regurgitation. Echocardiography is the primary imaging modality for assessment of aortic valvular lesions. Cardiac catheterization is indicated to determine the severity of the aortic valve lesion when there is a discrepancy between the clinical findings and the results of echocardiography in patients with either symptoms or left ventricular dysfunction. For patients with low-gradient, low-output aortic stenosis, dobutamine provocation should be used to differentiate truly severe aortic stenosis from patients with a primary cardiomyopathy and low aortic valve area due to low forward flow. Aortic valve surgery improves myocardial performance by relief of ventricular afterload in both patients with severe stenosis and those with severe regurgitation. Surgery should be pursued in both patients with severe aortic stenosis and those with severe regurgitation regardless of the degree of left ventricular dysfunction.