Interrater and test-retest reliability of the Hand Assessment for Infants.

AIM: To evaluate the interrater and test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM), and the smallest detectable difference (SDD) of the Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI). METHOD: HAI assessments of 55 infants (26 females, 29 males), 25 with clinical signs of unilateral cerebral palsy (CP) and 30 typically developing (mean [SD] age 6.8mo [2.4], range 3-11mo), were scored individually by three therapists. Three clinically experienced occupational therapists (OT 1-OT 3) with extensive experience in using the HAI, independently scored the video recorded HAI play sessions. Analysis of the combined group of infants and just the infants with clinical signs of unilateral CP (12 females, 13 males; mean age 7.6mo [2.1]) were conducted. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC, 2.1), Bland-Altman plots, SEM, and SDD were calculated. RESULTS: Interrater and test-retest reliability were excellent for the Both Hands Measure (BoHM) and the Each Hand Sum score (EaHS), with ICCs of 0.96 to 0.99. For individual items, the interrater and test-retest reliability was good to excellent (ICC 0.81-0.99). The SDD for the EaHS was 2 points, and for the BoHM the SDD it was 3 HAI units for infants with signs of unilateral CP. INTERPRETATION: The HAI results showed good to excellent reliability. The SDDs were low, indicating that results beyond these levels exceed the measurement error and, thus, can be considered true changes. What this study adds The Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI) shows excellent reliability. A change of ≥3 HAI units is considered a true change. The HAI yields reliable measures for research and clinical practice.

Predictive validity of the Hand Assessment for Infants in infants at risk of unilateral cerebral palsy.

AIM: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of the Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI) in identifying infants at risk of being diagnosed with unilateral cerebral palsy (CP), and to determine cut-off values for this purpose. METHOD: A convenience sample of 203 infants (106 females, 97 males) was assessed by the HAI at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios were calculated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Cut-off values were derived for different ages. The clinical outcome (unilateral CP yes/no) at 24 months or more served as an external criterion to investigate the predictive validity of HAI. RESULTS: Half of the infants developed unilateral CP. The area under the curve ranged from 0.77 (95% CI [confidence interval] 0.63-0.91) to 0.95 (95% CI 0.90-1.00) across HAI scales and age intervals. Likewise, sensitivity ranged from 63% to 93%, specificity from 62% to 91%, and accuracy from 73% to 94%. INTERPRETATION: HAI scores demonstrated overall accuracy that ranged from very good to excellent in predicting unilateral CP in infants at risk aged between 3.5 and 12 months. This accuracy increased with age at assessment and the earliest possible prediction was at 3.5 months of age, when appropriate HAI cut-off values for different ages were applied. What this paper adds The Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI) predicts unilateral cerebral palsy (CP) with high accuracy. HAI cut-off values can guide clinical practice for early identification and diagnosis of unilateral CP.

Hand Assessment for Infants: normative reference values.

AIM: To create normative reference values for unilateral and bilateral use of the hands, using the Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI), a newly developed criterion-referenced assessment measuring hand use in infants aged 3 months to 12 months at risk of cerebral palsy (CP). METHOD: In total, 489 HAI assessments of typically developing infants (243 females, 246 males), aged 3 months to 10 months (mean 6mo 14d [SD 2mo 5d]), were collected in Italy and Sweden. Normative growth curves based on mean and SDs were created, as well as skill acquisition curves for each test item. Correlation to age and differences between groups based on sex and nationality, as well as differences between the right and the left hand, were investigated. RESULTS: The growth curves showed a steady increase in mean value and a decrease in SD over age. There were no differences between groups based on sex or nationality. There was a negligible mean difference (0.1 raw score) between the right and left hands. INTERPRETATION: HAI normative reference values are now available, which can assist in identifying deviating hand use for each month of age, as well as a side difference between hands in infants at risk of CP. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: A Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI) result greater than 2SD below the mean indicates atypical hand use. Skill acquisition curves describe the age at which typically developing infants master the HAI items. Most typically developing infants do not demonstrate asymmetry in hand use.

EVALUACIÓN DE LA FUNCIÓN DE LA MANO PARA BEBÉS (HAI): VALORES NORMATIVOS DE REFERENCIA: OBJETIVO: Para crear valores de referencia normativos para el uso unilateral y bilateral de las manos, utilizando la Evaluación de la Mano para Infantes (HAI), una evaluación recientemente desarrollada basada en criterios que mide el uso de las manos en lactantes de 3 a 12 meses con riesgo de parálisis cerebral (PC). MÉTODO: En total, se recolectaron 489 evaluaciones usando el HAI de bebés con desarrollo típico (243 femeninos, 246 masculinos), de 3 a 10 meses (media 6 meses 14 días [DS 2 meses 5 días]), en Italia y Suecia. Se crearon curvas de crecimiento normativas basadas en la media y las desviaciones estándar, así como curvas de adquisición de habilidades para cada elemento de prueba. Se investigó la correlación con la edad y las diferencias entre grupos según el sexo y la nacionalidad, así como las diferencias entre la mano derecha y la mano izquierda. RESULTADOS: Las curvas de crecimiento mostraron un aumento constante en el valor medio y una disminución en el DE a lo largo de la edad. No hubo diferencias entre grupos por sexo o nacionalidad. Hubo una diferencia de medias insignificante (puntaje bruto de 0,1) entre las manos derecha e izquierda. INTERPRETACIÓN: Este estudio aporta los valores de referencia normativos de HAI, los cuales están disponibles, lo que puede ayudar a identificar la función de las manos que se desvía de los parámetros considerados como normales para cada mes de edad, así como una diferencia lateral entre las manos de los bebés en riesgo de PC.

AVALIAÇÃO DA MÃO PARA LACTENTES (AML): VALORES NORMATIVOS DE REFERÊNCIA: OBJETIVO: Criar valores normativos de referência para uso unilateral e bilateral das mãos, usando a Avaliação da mão para lactentes (AML), uma avaliação baseada em critérios que foi desenvolvida recentemente para mensurar o uso da mão em lactentes de 3 a 12 anos em risco para paralisia cerebral (PC). MÉTODO: No total, 489 avaliações da AML de lactentes com desenvolvimento típico (243 do sexo feminino, 246 do sexo masculino), com idades de 3 a 10 meses (média 6m 14d [DP 2m 5]), foram coletadas na Itália e na Suécia. Curvas normativas de crescimento baseadas em médias e desvios padrão foram criadas, assim como curvas de aquisição de habilidades para cada item do teste. Correlação com a idade e diferenças entre grupos baseadas no sexo e na nacionalidade, assim como diferenças entre mão direita e esquerda, foram investigadas. RESULTADOS As curvas de crescimento mostraram aumento contínuo na média e diminuição no DP com a idade. Não houve diferenças enter grupos com base no sexo ou nacionalidade. Houve uma diferença média inexpressiva (0,1 escore bruto) entre mãos direita e esquerda. INTERPRETAÇÃO: Valores normativos de referência da AML agora estão disponíveis, o que pode ajudar a identificar o uso anormal da mão para cada mês de vida, assim como diferenças entre lados em lactentes em risco para PC.

Development of the Hand Assessment for Infants: evidence of internal scale validity.

AIM: The aim of this study was to develop a descriptive and evaluative assessment of upper limb function for infants aged 3 to 12 months and to investigate its internal scale validity for use with infants at risk of unilateral cerebral palsy. METHOD: The concepts of the test items and scoring criteria were developed. Internal scale validity and aspects of reliability were investigated on the basis of 156 assessments of infants at 3 to 12 months corrected age (mean 7.2mo, SD 2.5) with signs of asymmetric hand use. Rasch measurement model analysis and non-parametric statistics were used. RESULTS: The new test, the Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI), consists of 12 unimanual and five bimanual items, each scored on a 3-point rating scale. It demonstrated a unidimensional construct and good fit to the Rasch model requirements. The excellent person reliability enabled person separation to six significant ability strata. The HAI produced an interval-level measure of bilateral hand use as well as unimanual scores of each hand, allowing a quantification of possible asymmetry expressed as an asymmetry index. INTERPRETATION: The HAI can be considered a valid assessment tool for measuring bilateral hand use and quantifying side difference between hands among infants at risk of developing unilateral cerebral palsy. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: The Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI) measures the use of both hands and quantifies a possible asymmetry of hand use. HAI is valid for infants at 3 to 12 months corrected age at risk of unilateral cerebral palsy.

Assisting Hand Assessment and Children's Hand-Use Experience Questionnaire -Observed Versus Perceived Bimanual Performance in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy.

AIMS: To explore the differences, relationship, and extent of agreement between the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA), measuring observed ability to perform bimanual tasks, and the Children's Hand-Use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ), assessing experienced bimanual performance. METHODS: This study investigates a convenience sample of 34 children (16 girls) with unilateral cerebral palsy aged 6-18 years (mean 12.1, SD 3.9) in a cross-sectional design. RESULTS: The AHA and CHEQ subscales share 8-25% of their variance (R2). Bland-Altman plots for AHA and all three CHEQ subscales indicate good average agreement, with a mean difference approaching zero but large 95% confidence intervals. Limits of agreement were extremely wide, indicating considerable disagreement between AHA and CHEQ subscales. CONCLUSION: AHA and CHEQ seem to measure different though somewhat related constructs of bimanual performance. Results of this investigation reinforce the recommendation to use both instruments to obtain complementary information about bimanual performance including observed and perceived performance of children with unilateral cerebral palsy.

Guidelines for future research in constraint-induced movement therapy for children with unilateral cerebral palsy: an expert consensus.

AIM: The aim of this study was to provide an overview of what is known about constraintinduced movement therapy (CIMT) in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (CP), to identify current knowledge gaps, and to provide suggestions for future research. METHOD: Nine experts participated in a consensus meeting. A comprehensive literature search was conducted and data were summarized before the meeting. The core model produced by the European network for Health Technology Assessment was used as a framework for discussion and to identify critical issues for future research. RESULTS: All models of CIMT have demonstrated improvements in the upper limb abilities of children with unilateral CP. A consensus was reached on 11 important questions to be further explored in future studies. The areas of highest priority included the effect of dosage, the effect of repeated CIMT, and the impact of predictive factors, such as age, on the response to CIMT. Consensus suggestions for future study designs and the use of validated outcome measures were also provided. INTERPRETATION: The CIMT construct is complex, and much remains unknown. It is unclear whether a specific model of CIMT demonstrates superiority over others and whether dosage of training matters. Future research should build upon existing knowledge and aim to provide information that will help implement CIMT in various countries with different healthcare resources and organizational structures.

Influence of standardized activities on validity of Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control.

The Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control (ACMC) is an observation-based clinical tool that evaluates ability to control a myoelectric prosthetic hand during bimanual activities. Two validity aspects were investigated: potential bias interaction between prosthesis users and activities performed during assessment, and potential bias interaction between activities and different user characteristics (sex or prosthetic side). Six activities were standardized for the ACMC. Upper-limb myoelectric prosthesis users (47 congenital, 11 acquired; 31 male, 27 female, average age 19.9 yr) performed three standardized activities, each on one occasion. Bias-interaction analysis in the many-facet Rasch model identified inconsistent patterns in the interactions of individual users and activity facets and between activities and user characteristics. The standardized activities had no significant influence on measures of user ability. The activities functioned similarly across both sexes (p-value greater than or equal to0.12) and across both prosthetic sides in persons with upper-limb reduction deficiency (p-value greater than or equal to0.50) and persons with acquired amputation (p-value greater than or equal to0.13). The results provide evidence for the validity of the ACMC across the standardized activities and support use of the ACMC in prosthesis users of both sexes and prosthetic sides. The newly standardized activities are recommended for future ACMC use.

The Assisting Hand Assessment: current evidence of validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change.

The Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) provides a new perspective of hand function evaluation relevant for children with unilateral upper limb disabilities. It measures how effectively the involved hand is actually used for bimanual activity, which, for these children, might be the most important aspect of their hand function. The aim of this paper is to report the conceptual framework and the evidence for validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change for the measures. Previously, the AHA has been evaluated for children aged 18 months to 5 years and excellent inter- and intrarater reliability was demonstrated. This paper reports further evidence of construct validity and reliability for the AHA measures involving an extended age range of children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy or obstetric brachial plexus palsy from 18 months to 12 years of age (mean age 4y 11mo [SD 2y 9mo] range 18mo-12y 8mo). A Rasch measurement model was used to analyze 409 assessments from 303 children (170 males, 133 females). The analysis generated a scale demonstrating large capacity to reliably separate and spread personal ability measures, indicating sensitivity to change and a hierarchy of the items ranging them from easy to hard. Aspects of item fit, relationship between age and ability measures, and development of assisting hand function are discussed.

Interrater and intrarater reliability of the Assisting Hand Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate interrater and intrarater reliability for the Assisting Hand Assessment. METHOD: For interrater reliability, two designs were used: 2 occupational therapists rated the same 18 children, and 20 occupational therapists rated the same 8 children. For intrarater reliability, 20 raters each rated one child twice. Both English and Swedish versions of the instrument were used. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated. RESULTS: ICCs for the sum score for the interrater were 0.98 (two raters) and 0.97 (20 raters) and for the intrarater 0.99. SEM was 1.5 for interrater and 1.2 for the intrarater study, which gave an error interval of +/-3 raw scores for interrater and +/- 2.4 raw scores for intrarater. CONCLUSION: This study shows excellent interrater and intrarater reliability for sum scores.

Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the assessment of capacity for myoelectric control.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability of the Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control (ACMC) in children and adults with a myoelectric prosthetic hand. DESIGN: Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability estimated from reported assessments by 3 different raters. PATIENTS: A sample of convenience of 26 subjects (11 males, 15 females) with upper limb reduction deficiency or amputation and myoelectric prosthetic hands were video-taped during a regular clinical visit for ACMC. Participants' ages ranged from 2 to 40 years. METHODS: After instruction, 3 occupational therapists with no, 10 weeks' and 15 years' clinical experience of myoelectric prosthesis training and follow-up independently rated the 30 ACMC items for each patient. The ratings were repeated after 2-4 weeks. Inter- and intra-rater reliability in items was examined by using weighted kappa statistics and Rasch-measurement analyses. RESULTS: The mean intra-rater agreement in items was excellent (kappa 0.81) in the more experienced raters. Fit statistics showed too much variation in the least experienced rater, who also had only good (kappa 0.65) agreement in items. The stability of rater calibrations between first and second assessment showed that no rater varied beyond chance (>0.50 logit) in severity. The mean inter-rater agreement in items was fair; kappa 0.60, between the experienced raters and kappa 0.47 between raters with no and 10 weeks' experience. CONCLUSION: Overall, the agreement was higher in the more experienced raters, indicating that reliable measures of the ACMC require clinical experience from myoelectric prosthesis training.

Assessment of capacity for myoelectric control: a new Rasch-built measure of prosthetic hand control.

OBJECTIVE: To report the results from a Rasch rating scale analysis of the Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control (ACMC) implemented to evaluate internal scale validity, person response validity, separation reliability, targeting and responsiveness of the measures over time. DESIGN: Longitudinal data (18 months) from a prospective study of development of capacity for myoelectric control in children and adults were used for the analysis. PATIENTS: A consecutive sample of 75 subjects (43 males, 32 females) with upper limb reduction deficiency or amputation and myoelectric prosthetic hands referred for occupational therapy from September 2000 to March 2002. Participants' ages ranged from 2 to 57 years. METHODS: Outcome measure was the ACMC. Occupational therapists completed 210 assessments at an arm prosthesis centre in Sweden. A two-faceted rating scale analysis of the data was performed. RESULTS: All 30 ACMC items and 96.2% of participants demonstrated goodness-of-fit to the rating scale model for the ACMC. Separation and SE values suggested adequate reliability of the item and person estimates. CONCLUSION: The items demonstrated internal scale validity and the participants demonstrated person response validity. The ACMC was well targeted and sensitive enough to detect expected change in ability.