Risk stratified venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in bariatric patients using a Caprini assessment: practice patterns and opportunities for improvement.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is rare after bariatric surgery but is the most common cause of mortality. The use of VTE risk-stratification tools and compliance with practice guidelines remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to determine the utilization of risk-stratified VTE prophylaxis and its impact on VTE and bleeding outcomes. SETTING: Academic hospital system. METHODS: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy (2016-2021) were identified from our electronic health records. Caprini score and VTE prophylaxis regimen were retrospectively determined. VTE prophylaxis consistent with Caprini guidelines was considered appropriate. Outcomes were compared between VTE prophylaxis cohorts. Variables were compared by Kruskal-Wallis test, Pearson χ2 test, and regression models. A P value of <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 1849 bariatric cases were analyzed, including 64% Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and 36% sleeve gastrectomy cases. Of these, 70% and 3.7% received appropriate risk-stratified VTE prophylaxis during hospitalization and at discharge. The mean Caprini score was higher in those without appropriate prophylaxis (8.45 versus 8.04; P = .0004). Inpatient and 30- and 90-day VTE rates were .22%, .47%, and .64%. All discharge VTE events occurred in those not receiving appropriate Caprini risk-stratified VTE prophylaxis. Inpatient and 30- and 90-day bleeding complications were .22%, .23%, and .35%. The likelihood of receiving appropriate prophylaxis varied by hospital site, and receiving appropriate prophylaxis was not associated with increased bleeding risk. CONCLUSION: Caprini guideline-indicated VTE prophylaxis can be safely used in bariatric surgery patients and may reduce preventable VTE complications without increasing bleeding risk.

Racial Disparities in Outcomes Among Asians With Gastric Cancer in the USA.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We aimed to evaluate disparities in presentation and treatment of gastric cancer (GC), including time between diagnosis and treatment, based on race, focusing on Japanese patients within the USA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with GC between 2004-2013. Clinical and treatment variables were summarized by race (White, non-Japanese Asian, Japanese). The association between race and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using the log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 79,481 patients were included. Japanese patients received surgery the earliest after diagnosis in all stages. Regarding radiotherapy, white patients had the shortest waiting time followed by Asian and Japanese patients. Asian patients had better OS at both 3 and 5 years of follow-up. White patients were associated with the lowest OS. CONCLUSION: Japanese and Asian GC patients have better OS compared to White patients. Moreover, there were disparities in time to both GC diagnosis and treatment, with Japanese patients being sooner diagnosed and surgically treated, which may ultimately impact patient experience.

Utility of Immediate Postoperative Upper Gastrointestinal Contrast Study in Bariatric Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Routine use of postoperative upper gastrointestinal (UGI) contrast studies after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is controversial. We sought to determine the usefulness of routine UGI contrast studies during postoperative day (POD) 1 in patients who underwent bariatric surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent SG or RYGB between January 1, 2016, and October 31, 2017. Demographics, surgical data, and immediate surgical adverse effects were collected. We compared patients who underwent routine UGI contrast studies on POD 1 versus patients who did not. RESULTS: A total of 284 patients were analyzed; 197 (69.4%) patients underwent RYGB, while 87 (30.6%) underwent SG. Routine UGI contrast study was performed in 96 (48.7%) patients in the RYGB group versus 31 (35.6%) in the SG group. The overall adverse effect rate was 2 (0.7%); postoperative UGI contrast study was negative in both cases. Mean (SD) length of stay (LOS) for patients who underwent UGI contrast study versus those who did not was similar in the RYGB group (1.8 [1.6] days vs 1.8 [0.9] days, respectively) and the SG group (2 [1.18] days vs 1.9 [0.9] days). The average cost of a postoperative UGI contrast study was $600, resulting in an additional overall cost of $76,800. CONCLUSION: Use of routine UGI contrast studies after bariatric procedures does not appear to add clinical value for the detection of leaks. Furthermore, systematic use of postoperative UGI contrast studies neither seem to reduce LOS, nor appear to increase procedure costs.

Perioperative risk assessment in robotic general surgery: lessons learned from 884 cases at a single institution.

OBJECTIVE: To assess factors associated with morbidity and mortality following the use of robotics in general surgery. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: University of Illinois at Chicago. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: Eight hundred eighty-four consecutive patients who underwent a robotic procedure in our institution between April 2007 and July 2010. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Perioperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: During the study period, 884 patients underwent a robotic procedure. The conversion rate was 2%, the mortality rate was 0.5%, and the overall postoperative morbidity rate was 16.7%. The reoperation rate was 2.4%. Mean length of stay was 4.5 days (range, 0.2-113 days). In univariate analysis, several factors were associated with increased morbidity and included either patient-related (cardiovascular and renal comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥ 3, body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared] <30, age ≥ 70 years, and malignant disease) or procedure-related (blood loss ≥ 500 mL, transfusion, multiquadrant operation, and advanced procedure) factors. In multivariate analysis, advanced procedure, multiquadrant surgery, malignant disease, body mass index of less than 30, hypertension, and transfusion were factors significantly associated with a higher risk for complications. American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 or greater, age 70 years or older, cardiovascular comorbidity, and blood loss of 500 mL or more were also associated with increased risk for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the robotic approach for general surgery can be achieved safely with low morbidity and mortality. Several risk factors have been identified as independent causes for higher morbidity and mortality. These can be used to identify patients at risk before and during the surgery and, in the future, to develop a scoring system for the use of robotic general surgery