Assessment and management of chronic insomnia disorder: an algorithm for primary care physicians.

BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians often lack resources and training to correctly diagnose and manage chronic insomnia disorder. Tools supporting chronic insomnia diagnosis and management could fill this critical gap. A survey was conducted to understand insomnia disorder diagnosis and treatment practices among primary care physicians, and to evaluate a diagnosis and treatment algorithm on its use, to identify ways to optimize it specifically for these providers. METHODS: A panel of experts developed an algorithm for diagnosing and treating chronic insomnia disorder, based on current guidelines and experience in clinical practice. An online survey was conducted with primary care physicians from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom, who treat chronic insomnia patients, between January and February 2023. A sub-sample of participants provided open-ended feedback on the algorithm and gave suggestions for improvements. RESULTS: Overall, 106 primary care physicians completed the survey. Half (52%, 55/106) reported they did not regularly screen for insomnia and half (51%, 54/106) felt they did not have enough time to address patients' needs in relation to insomnia or trouble sleeping. The majority (87%,92/106) agreed the algorithm would help diagnose chronic insomnia patients and 82% (87/106) agreed the algorithm would help improve their clinical practice in relation to managing chronic insomnia. Suggestions for improvements were making the algorithm easier to read and use. CONCLUSION: The algorithm developed for, and tested by, primary care physicians to diagnose and treat chronic insomnia disorder may offer significant benefits to providers and their patients through ensuring standardization of insomnia diagnosis and management.

What makes people want to make changes to their sleep? Assessment of perceived risks of insufficient sleep as a predictor of intent to improve sleep.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study is to identify which underlying beliefs about the impact of sleep on health may motivate change in sleep behavior. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study conducted between 2012 and 2014. SETTING: Data were from the Sleep and Healthy Activity, Diet, Environment, and Socialization (SHADES) study conducted in Philadelphia, PA, and its surrounding regions. PARTICIPANTS: Participants consisted of N = 1007 community-dwelling adults age 22-60. MEASUREMENTS: Respondents indicated behaviors they could improve on to facilitate sleep and their corresponding readiness to change. They were also asked items from the Sleep Practices and Attitudes Questionnaire (SPAQ) regarding the degree to which they agree with whether "not getting enough sleep" can impact a variety of health factors. RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, stage of change was associated with degree of agreement that insufficient sleep can cause sleepiness (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17, P = .035), weight gain (OR = 1.20, P < .0005), heart disease (OR = 1.21, P = .001), cholesterol (OR = 1.13, P = .047), hypertension (OR = 1.16, P = .014), moodiness (OR = 1.42, P < .0005), decreased energy (OR = 1.30, P = .002), absenteeism (OR = 1.13, P = .007), decreased performance (OR = 1.20, P = .003), concentration/memory problems (OR = 1.23, P = .004), diabetes (OR = 1.14, P = .042), and feeling tired (OR = 1.39, P < .0005). When sleep duration was added to the model, significant associations remained for all except cholesterol. When accounting for insomnia, significant associations were maintained for only weight, moodiness, performance, diabetes, and tiredness. CONCLUSIONS: Degree of belief that insufficient sleep can cause outcomes such as moodiness, occupational problems, and health problems may impact whether an individual is contemplating/attempting to change their sleep-related behaviors. Targeting these key messages about the associations between sleep health with moodiness and weight gain in informational material may enhance education/outreach efforts aimed at adults.

Intensive community treatment and support "Youth Wraparound" service in Western Australia: A case and feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Multiple services are often needed to address the needs of young people with complex emotional or behavioural needs. The Youth Wraparound model of service aims to provide all health and supportive services from one coordinating agency. While this has been researched overseas, there are currently few examples of this described in the Australian psychiatric context. AIM: To document the implementation and evaluation of a Youth Wraparound service which was provided to a young person with exceptionally complex and challenging needs for 6 months. A single-case study design is presented with an evaluation of the clinical outcome and economic costs. METHODS: We present a description of the service context, principles of the model of care, implementation process, and an evaluation of service utilization data from health and child protection services and mental health records. A single-case longitudinal design compared service utilization data obtained up to 3 years prior to treatment with data collected one and a half years since treatment commenced. RESULTS: There were significant reductions in the number of admissions to emergency departments, mental health wards and secure units, and improvements in mental health and well-being. Yearly average time in institutional settings reduced from 69% to 7%. Cost savings in health utilization were estimated at $2 326 790. CONCLUSIONS: The Youth Wraparound model has the potential to offer improved clinical outcomes, significant cost savings over time, improved coordination between care providers, and an alternative to detention or incarceration.

Locus of control fails to mediate between stress and anxiety and depression in parents of children with a developmental disorder.

Stress, anxiety and depression are raised amongst parents of children with a developmental disorder. However, the processes by which stress leads to depression and anxiety are poorly understood. In a cross-sectional survey, levels of parental stress, depression and anxiety were compared between parents of children with an autistic disorder, children with Down's syndrome and children with no disorder (N = 619) and the mediational role of locus of control was examined. Anxiety and depression were higher in parents of children with a disorder, and highest in parents of children with autism. Locus of control was more external in parents of children with autism. Locus of control failed to mediate the relationship between stress and both anxiety and depression in parents of children with a disorder. This suggests that help for parents of a child with a disorder may be effective if focused on the sources of stress rather than perceived control over events.