Feasibility of the A-STEP for the assessment of exercise capacity in people with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate feasibility of the Alfred Step Test Exercise Protocol (A-STEP) for the assessment of exercise capacity in adults and children with cystic fibrosis (CF); in adults to test whether demographics and/or lung function correlated with exercise capacity. METHODS: Adults and children with stable CF from two centres completed the A-STEP (a recently developed incremental maximal-effort step test). Feasibility was evaluated by: usefulness for exercise capacity assessment (measures of exercise capacity were: level reached, exercise-induced desaturation, and achievement of at least one maximal effort criteria); safety; operational factors; time to complete; floor and/or ceiling effects. We used multiple linear regression to test whether demographics and/or lung function correlated with exercise capacity. RESULTS: A total of 49 participants: 38 adults (18 male), percent predicted (pp) forced expiration in one second (FEV1 ) 29-109, aged 22-48 years and 11 children (6 male), ppFEV1 68-107, aged 10-15 years were included. Levels reached (mean (SD) [range]) were 10.2 (2.4) [6-15] (adults), 10.1 (2.5) [7-14] (children); desaturation (change between baseline and peak-exercise SpO2 ): was 8.4 (3.8 [0-15]% (adults), 2.0 (2.0) [0-7]% (children). A total of 8 (21%) adults and no children desaturated <90% SpO2 . At least one criterion for maximal effort was reached by 33 (84%) adults and 10 (91%) children. There were no adverse events. The A-STEP was straightforward to use and carried out by one operator. A total of 26 (68.4%) adults and 7 (63.6%) children completed the test within the recommended 8-12 min. All participants completed a minimum of 6 levels, and completed the test before the final 16th level. In adults, ppFEV1 and ppFVC correlated with the level reached (r = 0.55; p = <0.001 and r = 0.66, p = <0.0001) and desaturation (r = 0.55, p = <0.001 and r = 0.45, p = <0.005). CONCLUSION: In adults and children with stable CF, the A-STEP was feasible, safe, and operationally easy to use for the assessment of exercise capacity, without floor or ceiling effects. In adults, lung function correlated with exercise capacity.

Race, Ethnicity, and Clinical Outcomes in Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Node-Negative Breast Cancer in the Randomized TAILORx Trial.

BACKGROUND: Black race is associated with worse outcomes in early breast cancer. We evaluated clinicopathologic characteristics, the 21-gene recurrence score (RS), treatment delivered, and clinical outcomes by race and ethnicity among women who participated in the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment. METHODS: The association between clinical outcomes and race (White, Black, Asian, other or unknown) and ethnicity (Hispanic vs non-Hispanic) was examined using proportional hazards models. All P values are 2-sided. RESULTS: Of 9719 eligible women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer, there were 8189 (84.3%) Whites, 693 (7.1%) Blacks, 405 (4.2%) Asians, and 432 (4.4%) with other or unknown race. Regarding ethnicity, 889 (9.1%) were Hispanic. There were no substantial differences in RS or ESR1, PGR, or HER2 RNA expression by race or ethnicity. After adjustment for other covariates, compared with White race, Black race was associated with higher distant recurrence rates (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.60, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 1.07 to 2.41) and worse overall survival in the RS 11-25 cohort (HR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.06 to 2.15) and entire population (HR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.90). Hispanic ethnicity and Asian race were associated with better outcomes. There was no evidence of chemotherapy benefit for any racial or ethnic group in those with a RS of 11-25. CONCLUSIONS: Black women had worse clinical outcomes despite similar 21-gene assay RS results and comparable systemic therapy in the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment. Similar to Whites, Black women did not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy if the 21-gene RS was 11-25. Further research is required to elucidate the basis for this racial disparity in prognosis.

Transplant social worker and donor financial assistance to increase living donor kidney transplants among African Americans: The TALKS Study, a randomized comparative effectiveness trial.

Lack of donors hinders living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) for African Americans. We studied the effectiveness of a transplant social worker intervention (TALK SWI) alone or paired with living donor financial assistance to activate African Americans' potential living kidney donors. African Americans (N = 300) on the transplant waiting list were randomly assigned to usual care; TALK SWI; or TALK SWI plus Living Donor Financial Assistance. We quantified differences in live kidney donor activation (composite rate of live donor inquiries, completed new live donor evaluations, or live kidney donation) after 12 months. Participants' mean age was 52 years, 56% were male, and 43% had annual household income less than $40,000. Most previously pursued LDKT. Participants were highly satisfied with TALK social workers, but they rarely utilized Financial Assistance. After 12 months, few (n = 39, 13%) participants had a new donor activation event (35 [12%] new donor inquiries; 17 [6%] new donor evaluations; 4 [1%] LDKT). There were no group differences in donor activation events (subdistribution hazard ratio [95% CI]: 1.09 [0.51-2.30] for TALK SWI and 0.92 [0.42-2.02] for TALK SWI plus Financial Assistance compared to Usual Care, p = 91). Alternative interventions to increase LDKT for African Americans on the waiting list may be needed. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02369354).

Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Updated Recommendations From the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group.

Ki67 immunohistochemistry (IHC), commonly used as a proliferation marker in breast cancer, has limited value for treatment decisions due to questionable analytical validity. The International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group (IKWG) consensus meeting, held in October 2019, assessed the current evidence for Ki67 IHC analytical validity and clinical utility in breast cancer, including the series of scoring studies the IKWG conducted on centrally stained tissues. Consensus observations and recommendations are: 1) as for estrogen receptor and HER2 testing, preanalytical handling considerations are critical; 2) a standardized visual scoring method has been established and is recommended for adoption; 3) participation in and evaluation of quality assurance and quality control programs is recommended to maintain analytical validity; and 4) the IKWG accepted that Ki67 IHC as a prognostic marker in breast cancer has clinical validity but concluded that clinical utility is evident only for prognosis estimation in anatomically favorable estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative patients to identify those who do not need adjuvant chemotherapy. In this T1-2, N0-1 patient group, the IKWG consensus is that Ki67 5% or less, or 30% or more, can be used to estimate prognosis. In conclusion, analytical validity of Ki67 IHC can be reached with careful attention to preanalytical issues and calibrated standardized visual scoring. Currently, clinical utility of Ki67 IHC in breast cancer care remains limited to prognosis assessment in stage I or II breast cancer. Further development of automated scoring might help to overcome some current limitations.

Reproducibility of Differential Proteomic Technologies in CPTAC Fractionated Xenografts.

The NCI Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) employed a pair of reference xenograft proteomes for initial platform validation and ongoing quality control of its data collection for The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) tumors. These two xenografts, representing basal and luminal-B human breast cancer, were fractionated and analyzed on six mass spectrometers in a total of 46 replicates divided between iTRAQ and label-free technologies, spanning a total of 1095 LC-MS/MS experiments. These data represent a unique opportunity to evaluate the stability of proteomic differentiation by mass spectrometry over many months of time for individual instruments or across instruments running dissimilar workflows. We evaluated iTRAQ reporter ions, label-free spectral counts, and label-free extracted ion chromatograms as strategies for data interpretation (source code is available from http://homepages.uc.edu/~wang2x7/Research.htm ). From these assessments, we found that differential genes from a single replicate were confirmed by other replicates on the same instrument from 61 to 93% of the time. When comparing across different instruments and quantitative technologies, using multiple replicates, differential genes were reproduced by other data sets from 67 to 99% of the time. Projecting gene differences to biological pathways and networks increased the degree of similarity. These overlaps send an encouraging message about the maturity of technologies for proteomic differentiation.

Initial versus sequential adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy: a review of the current data.

OBJECTIVE: One of the principle unresolved questions in adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer is whether it is more beneficial for women to receive aromatase inhibitor (AI) monotherapy or start with tamoxifen and then switch to AI therapy. This review will compare the current available efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness data for AIs in the initial adjuvant and switch adjuvant settings. METHODS: A search of the Medline database from 1976 through 2006 was performed for the following terms: breast cancer, adjuvant, aromatase inhibitors, anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane, tamoxifen, sequential, switching. A search for relevant abstracts from the EBCC, ECCO, ASCO, and SABCS conferences was also performed. RESULTS: In the upfront adjuvant setting, anastrozole and letrozole have both demonstrated a significant disease-free survival (DFS) benefit over tamoxifen. Upfront therapy with a nonsteroidal AI appears to be most critical for patients at risk of an early relapse, illustrated by the finding that upfront letrozole provided a significant early DFS advantage over tamoxifen only in patients with node-positive disease (hazard ratio = 0.71, p < 0.001). With respect to safety, both strategies have similar adverse event profiles. From an economic perspective, AIs, whether used upfront or sequentially, are considered cost-effective compared with tamoxifen due to the cost savings associated with a reduction in the breast cancer event rate. From the efficacy standpoint, modeling studies have produced inconsistent results and do not produce definitive data. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in patient populations, definitions of end points, and prior tamoxifen usage between the trials discussed necessitates a careful interpretation but may provide insights in the treatment decision-making process. The BIG 1-98 trial was designed to compare letrozole monotherapy versus a letrozole-to-tamoxifen or reverse-sequence approach and should provide insights to the question of optimal therapy. Until results are available, for higher-risk patients (i.e., those with positive lymph nodes), initiation of treatment with a non-steroidal AI may be beneficial to avoid tamoxifen-associated early relapses that occur in the first 2 years after diagnosis.

Letrozole in the treatment of breast cancer.

Over the last 30 years the role of tamoxifen in breast cancer treatment has been progressively expanded by clinical investigation to encompass the entire spectrum of disease from cancer chemoprevention to palliation of advanced disease. The primacy of tamoxifen for these indications in postmenopausal women is now under challenge by the selective aromatase inhibitors, a class of endocrine agent that induces oestrogen deprivation rather than oestrogen receptor blockade. This review considers the biochemical, pharmacological and clinical properties of the nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor letrozole. This agent is superior to tamoxifen for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, a finding that suggests that letrozole may ultimately eclipse tamoxifen for other indications, including chemoprevention. Further clinical investigation will be necessary to establish the risks and benefits of letrozole versus tamoxifen for each new indication, with adjuvant therapy being the next in line. The object of this review is to provide a reference source on the biochemical, pharmacological and clinical properties of letrozole for clinicians to consider both established and future indications.