Competency-Based Assessment Tool for Pediatric Esophagoscopy: International Modified Delphi Consensus.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Create a competency-based assessment tool for pediatric esophagoscopy with foreign body removal. STUDY DESIGN: Blinded modified Delphi consensus process. SETTING: Tertiary care center. METHODS: A list of 25 potential items was sent via the Research Electronic Data Capture database to 66 expert surgeons who perform pediatric esophagoscopy. In the first round, items were rated as "keep" or "remove" and comments were incorporated. In the second round, experts rated the importance of each item on a seven-point Likert scale. Consensus was determined with a goal of 7 to 25 final items. RESULTS: The response rate was 38/64 (59.4%) in the first round and returned questionnaires were 100% complete. Experts wanted to "keep" all items and 172 comments were incorporated. Twenty-four task-specific and 7 previously-validated global rating items were distributed in the second round, and the response rate was 53/64 (82.8%) with questionnaires returned 97.5% complete. Of the task-specific items, 9 reached consensus, 7 were near consensus, and 8 did not achieve consensus. For global rating items that were previously validated, 6 reached consensus and 1 was near consensus. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to reach consensus about the important steps involved in rigid esophagoscopy with foreign body removal using a modified Delphi consensus technique. These items can now be considered when evaluating trainees during this procedure. This tool may allow trainees to focus on important steps of the procedure and help training programs standardize how trainees are evaluated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5. Laryngoscope, 131:1168-1174, 2021.

Aerodynamic and acoustic assessment in children following airway reconstruction: an assessment of feasibility.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of conducting aerodynamic and acoustic assessment in children following airway reconstruction. Underlying etiologies, co-morbidities and age related factors can present challenges for meaningful instrumental data collection in this population. METHODS: A chart review of 100 children who were seen for a complete voice evaluation at the Center for Pediatric Voice Disorders at the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center was conducted. Children who completed full or partial aerodynamic and acoustic protocols were identified. Data regarding the ability to participate in the assessment was tabulated, and vowel samples taken from the acoustic data were subjected to signal type classifications (e.g., Type I, II, III). RESULTS: Fifty-three children met the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the chart review. Of those children, 58% (n=31/53) were able to complete the full acoustic and aerodynamic protocols without any modification. In regards to the aerodynamic protocol alone, 64% (n=34/53) could complete protocol. In regards to the acoustic protocol alone, 75% (n=40/53) could complete the entire acoustic protocol without any modification. There were 32% (n=17) who provided a Type I acoustic signal which was appropriate for measurement of F(0). There was a significant correlation between age and ability to complete the protocol for both the aerodynamic (p=.007) and acoustic (p=.004) protocols. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that a majority of children were capable of completing aerodynamic and acoustic protocols. A significant proportion of children in this study had severe dysphonia, precluding the ability to extract fundamental frequency. Although aerodynamic and acoustic measures are feasible for many patients in this population, the severity of dysphonias observed in these patients causes the use of these measures to be limited in some cases for documenting behavioral and surgical outcomes measures.