Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Rheumatol Int ; 38(3): 393-401, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29353388

RESUMO

We hypothesized that ultrasound (US) guidance improves outcomes of corticosteroid injection of trochanteric bursitis. 40 patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome defined by pain to palpation over the trochanteric bursa were randomized to injection with 5 ml of 1% lidocaine and 80 mg of methylprednisolone using (1) conventional anatomic landmark palpation guidance or (2) US guidance. Procedural pain (Visual Analogue Pain Scale), pain at outcome (2 weeks and 6 months), therapeutic duration, time-to-next intervention, and costs were determined. There were no complications in either group. Ultrasonography demonstrated that at least a 2-in (50.8 mm) needle was required to consistently reach the trochanteric bursa. Pain scores were similar at 2 weeks: US: 1.3 ± 1.9 cm; landmark: 2.2 ± 2.5 cm, 95% CI of difference: - 0.7 < 0.9 < 2.5, p = 0.14. At 6 months, US was superior: US: 3.9 ± 2.0 cm; landmark: 5.5 ± 2.6 cm, 95% CI of difference: 0.8 < 1.6 < 2.4, p = 0.036. However, therapeutic duration (US 4.7 ± 1.4 months; landmark 4.1 ± 2.9 months, 95% CI of difference - 2.2 < - 0.6 < 1.0, p = 0.48), and time-to-next intervention (US 8.7 ± 2.9 months; landmark 8.3 ± 3.8 months, 95% CI of difference - 2.8 < - 0.4 < 2.0, p = 0.62) were similar. Costs/patient/year was 43% greater with US (US $297 ± 99, landmark $207 ± 95; p = 0.017). US-guided and anatomic landmark injection of the trochanteric bursa have similar 2-week and 6-month outcomes; however, US guidance is considerably more expensive and less cost-effective. Anatomic landmark-guided injection remains the method of choice, but should be routinely performed using a sufficiently long needle [at least a 2 in (50.8 mm)]. US guidance should be reserved for extreme obesity or injection failure.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/economia , Bolsa Sinovial/efeitos dos fármacos , Bursite/tratamento farmacológico , Bursite/economia , Custos de Medicamentos , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Glucocorticoides/economia , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Lidocaína/economia , Metilprednisolona/administração & dosagem , Metilprednisolona/economia , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Pontos de Referência Anatômicos , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Bolsa Sinovial/diagnóstico por imagem , Bolsa Sinovial/fisiopatologia , Bursite/diagnóstico por imagem , Bursite/fisiopatologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Fêmur , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Injeções Intralesionais , Lidocaína/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Metilprednisolona/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Agulhas/economia , Medição da Dor , Palpação/economia , Dados Preliminares , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos
2.
Clin Rheumatol ; 33(6): 849-58, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24277115

RESUMO

This randomized controlled study addressed whether sonographic needle guidance affected the outcomes of corticosteroid injection for symptomatic carpal tunnel syndrome. Seventy-seven symptomatic carpal tunnels were randomized to injection by either (1) conventional anatomic landmark palpation-guided injection or (2) sonographic image-guided injection, each using a two-step technique where 3 ml of 1% lidocaine was first injected to hydrodissect and hydrodisplace critical intra-carpal tunnel structures followed by injection with 80 mg of triamcinolone acetonide (2 ml). Baseline pain, procedural pain, pain at outcome (2 weeks and 6 months), responders, therapeutic duration, total cost, and cost per responder were determined. There were no complications in either treatment group. Relative to conventional anatomic landmark palpation-guided methods, sonographic guidance for injection of the carpal tunnel resulted in 77.1% reduction in injection pain (p<0.01), a 63.3% reduction in pain scores at outcome (p<0.014), 93.5% increase in the responder rate (p<0.001), 84.6% reduction in the non-responder rate (p<0.001), a 71.0% increase in therapeutic duration (p<0.001), and a 59.3% ($150) reduction in cost/responder/year for a hospital outpatient (p<0.001). However, despite improved outcomes, cost per patient per year was significantly increased for an outpatient in a physician's office and was neutral for a hospital outpatient. Sonographic needle guidance significantly improves the performance and clinical outcomes of injection of the carpal tunnel and is cost-effective for a hospital-based practice, but based on current reimbursements, it significantly increases overall costs for medical care delivered in a non-hospital-based physician practice.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/economia , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/terapia , Injeções Intra-Articulares/economia , Triancinolona Acetonida/administração & dosagem , Ultrassonografia , Adulto , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/diagnóstico por imagem , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Dor/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA