Trends in Costs and Professional Reimbursements for Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: With increasing numbers of revision total hip and total knee arthroplasties (rTHAs and rTKAs), understanding trends in related out-of-pocket (OOP) costs, overall costs, and provider reimbursements is critical to improve patient access to care. METHODS: A large database was used to identify 92,116 patients who underwent rTHA or rTKA between 2009 and 2018. The OOP costs associated with the surgery and related inpatient care were calculated as the sum of copayment, coinsurance, and deductible payments. Professional reimbursement was calculated as total payments to the principal physician. All monetary data were adjusted to 2018 dollars. Multivariate regressions evaluated the associations between costs and procedure type, insurance type, and region of service. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2018, overall costs for rTHA significantly increased by 35.0% and overall costs for rTKA significantly increased by 32.3%. The OOP costs for rTHA had no significant changes, while OOP costs for rTKA increased by 20.1%, with patients on Medicare plans having the lowest OOP costs. Professional reimbursements, when measured as a percentage of overall costs, decreased significantly by 4.4% for rTHA and 4.0% for rTKA, with the lowest reimbursements from Medicare plans. CONCLUSION: From 2009 to 2018, total costs related to rTHA and rTKA significantly increased. The OOP costs significantly increased for rTKA, and professional reimbursements for both rTHA and rTKA decreased relative to total costs. Overall, these trends may combine to create greater financial burden to patients and the healthcare system, as well as further limit patients' access to revision arthroplasty care.

The Cost of Getting in: Is It Time for Change in the Adult Reconstruction Fellowship Application Process?

BACKGROUND: The number of applicants to adult reconstruction fellowships (ARFs) has increased significantly in recent years, making the application process increasingly competitive. With this, applicants are applying to and interviewing at more programs which has inherent cost and time implications. The purpose of this study was to assess these implications as well as investigate applicant attitudes toward proposed changes. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional survey study of 2019 and 2020 ARF applicants (n = 278) to a single institution. A 10-question survey was distributed to applicants regarding the application and interview process. This survey focused on application and interview volumes, financial and temporal commitments, as well as perceptions regarding potential application process changes. Descriptive statistics and chi-squared analysis were then performed. RESULTS: Of the 110 (40%) respondents, 87% spent >$3000 and 43% spent >$5000 during the application process. Most respondents applied to ≥26 programs (84%) and both received and attended ≥11 interviews (87% and 74.5%, respectively). Applicants missed significant training time for interviews (99% missed at least 1 week, 62% two weeks, and 15% three weeks). Attending more interviews (P = .001) and multiple visits to the same city (P = .049) were associated with spending >$5000. Most applicants (72%) felt change to the process would be beneficial. CONCLUSIONS: Applicants to ARF are applying to and interviewing at many programs resulting in significant time away from training and financial investment. Most applicants feel that a change to the system would be beneficial, although no consensus on the best solution was delineated. These data should be considered during the continued evaluation of the match process.

Modified Frailty Index Is an Effective Risk Assessment Tool in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: "Frailty" is a marker of physiological decline of multiple organ systems, and the frailty index identifies patients who are more susceptible to postoperative complications. The purpose of this study is to validate the modified frailty index (MFI) as a predictor of postoperative complications, reoperations, and readmissions in patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2014 was queried by the Current Procedural Terminology code for primary TKA (27447). A previously described MFI was used to summate 11 variables in 5 organ systems. Bivariate analysis was performed for postoperative complications. A multiple logistic regression model was used to determine the relationship between MFI, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and 30-day reoperation, controlling for age, gender, and body mass index. RESULTS: A total of 90,260 patients underwent primary TKA during the study period. As MFI score increased, 30-day mortality significantly increased (P < .001). In addition, significantly higher rates of postoperative complications (all P < .001) were observed with increasing MFI: infection, wound, cardiac, pulmonary, and renal complications; and any occurrence. More frail patients also had increasing odds of adverse hospital discharge disposition, reoperation, and readmission (all P < .001). Length of hospital stay increased from 3.10 to 5.16 days (P < .001), while length of intensive care unit stay increased from 3.47 to 5.07 days (P < .001) between MFI score 0 and ≥0.36. MFI predicts 30-day reoperation with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.32 (95% confidence interval, 1.36-8.11; P < .001). Comparatively, MFI was a stronger predictor of reoperation compared with American Society of Anesthesiologists score and age with adjustment for gender and body mass index. CONCLUSION: Utilization of the MFI is a valid method in predicting postoperative complications, reoperations, and readmissions in patients undergoing primary TKA and can provide an effective and robust risk assessment tool to appropriately counsel patients and aid in preoperative optimization.

Trends in Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty Among Orthopedic Surgeons Who Take the American Board of Orthopedics Part II Examination.

BACKGROUND: A certified list of all operative cases performed within a 6-month period is a required prerequisite for surgeons taking the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II oral examination. Using the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery secure Internet database database containing these cases, this study (1) assessed changing trends for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and (2) compared practices and early postoperative complications between 2 groups of examinees, those with and without adult reconstruction fellowship training. METHODS: Secure Internet database was searched for all 2003-2013 procedures with a Current Procedural Terminology code for THA, hip resurfacing, hemiarthroplasty, revision hip arthroplasty, conversion to THA, or removal of hip implant (Girdlestone, static, or dynamic spacer). RESULTS: Adult reconstruction fellowship-trained surgeons performed 60% of the more than 33,000 surgeries identified (average 28.1) and nonfellowship-trained surgeons performed 40% (average 5.2) (P < .001). Fellowship-trained surgeons performed significantly more revision surgeries for infection (71% vs 29%)(P < .001). High-volume surgeons had significantly fewer complications in both primary (11.1% vs 19.6%) and revision surgeries (29% vs 35.5%) (P < .001). Those who passed the Part II examination reported higher rates of complications (21.5% vs 19.9%). CONCLUSION: In early practice, primary and revision hip arthroplasties are often performed by surgeons without adult reconstruction fellowship training. Complications are less frequently reported by surgeons with larger volumes of joint replacement surgery who perform either primary or more complex cases. Primary hip arthroplasty is increasingly performed by surgeons early in practice who have completed an adult reconstructive fellowship after residency training. This trend is even more pronounced for more complex cases such as revision or management of infection.

Trends in primary and revision knee arthroplasty among orthopaedic surgeons who take the American Board of Orthopaedics part II exam.

PURPOSE: A certified list of all operative cases performed within a six month period is required of surgeons by the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) as a prerequisite to taking the Part II Oral Examination. Using the data on these cases collected and maintained by ABOS, this study assessed the influence of prior fellowship training in adult reconstruction on the volume and surgeon-reported complication rate of knee joint arthroplasty cases over time. METHODS: All data were self reported to a secure Internet database (SCRIBE) by candidates who applied to take Part II of the ABOS Examination for the first time. This database was searched for all procedures done between 2003 and 2013 with CPT codes for total and revision knee arthroplasty and removal of knee implant (static or dynamic spacer) to determine procedural volumes and early complication rates among Board-eligible orthopaedic surgeons with and without adult reconstructive fellowship training. RESULTS: More than 43,000 knee arthroplasty surgeries were identified. Surgeons who had completed adult reconstruction fellowship training after residency performed 55 % of total knee arthroplasties, averaging 33.5 knee arthroplasties during the six month case-collection period compared to 7.4 procedures by non-fellowship-trained surgeons (p < 0.001). Adult reconstruction fellowship-trained surgeons performed significantly more revisions for infection (average 6.6 versus 2.2 revisions) (p < 0.001). Adult reconstruction fellowship training did not significantly affect complication rates for primary arthroplasty but was associated with an increased complication rate for revisions. Those surgeons who performed more than 100 arthroplasties a year reported significantly fewer complications in primary arthroplasties (12.7 % versus 16.9 %) (p < 0.001). Over time, an increasing percentage of arthroplasties were done by surgeons with adult reconstruction fellowship training. CONCLUSIONS: Adult reconstruction fellowship-trained surgeons performed an increasing number of primary and more complex knee arthroplasties from 2003 to 2013. Surgeons who perform a larger volume of knee arthroplasty surgeries report fewer early complications than surgeons with fewer cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.