Safety assessment of new antithrombotic agents: lessons from the EXTEND study on ximelagatran.

BACKGROUND: Ximelagatran, the first oral direct thrombin inhibitor, was shown to be an effective antithrombotic agent but was associated with potential liver toxicity after prolonged administration. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: The aim of the EXTEND study was to assess safety and efficacy of extended administration (35 days) of ximelagatran or enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective hip replacement and hip fracture surgery. A follow-up period, including assessment of liver enzymes (in particular alanine aminotransferase; ALAT), until post-operative day 180 was planned, with visits at days 56 and 180. RESULTS: Randomization and administration of study drugs were stopped following a report of serious liver injury occurring 3 weeks after completion of ximelagatran treatment. At the time of study termination, 1158 patients had been randomized and 641 had completed the 35-day treatment; with 303 ximelagatran and 265 enoxaparin patients remaining in the study through to the day 56 follow-up visit. Overall, 58 patients showed an ALAT increase to >2x upper limit of normal: 31 treated with enoxaparin, 27 with ximelagatran. Three ximelagatran patients also showed symptoms potentially related to liver toxicity. Eleven ximelagatran patients showed an ALAT increase after study treatment ended. The clinical development of ximelagatran was terminated and the drug withdrawn from the market. Evaluation of the relative efficacy of the two treatments as specified in the protocol was impossible due to the premature termination of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged administration of ximelagatran was associated with an increased risk of liver toxicity. In a substantial proportion of patients, ALAT increase occurred after treatment withdrawal. The findings seen with ximelagatran should be considered when designing studies with new antithrombotic agents.

New therapeutic options in deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis.

Joint replacement surgery is complicated by a high rate of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE). Current thromboprophylactic approaches reduce the rate of VTE, but the incidence remains as high as 20% to 50%. Recombinant hirudins, such as desirudin and lepirudin, function by directly inhibiting thrombin, and are a new development in antithrombotic therapy. In two multicenter studies, desirudin was found to be superior to unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after total hip alloplasty. A further trial of more than 2,000 patients undergoing elective hip replacement compared the thromboprophylactic efficacy of desirudin versus the low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) enoxaparin. Desirudin was more effective than LMWH in providing effective prophylaxis, and maintained superiority in patients with additional risk. Desirudin was shown to be equally safe and did not require laboratory monitoring. Desirudin (15 mg twice daily) is an efficient therapy for DVT prevention in hip alloplasty patients at additional risk.

Central assessment of bilateral phlebograms in a major multicentre thromboprophylactic trial. Reasons for inadequate results.

PURPOSE: To determine the cause of inadequate bilateral phlebograms at central assessment. A major antithrombotic trial was evaluated to identify and apply corrective measures for reducing inadequate results in future multicentre trials. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The inadequate results in 253 out of 1,827 patients having undergone bilateral phlebography following total hip replacement were reviewed by two central assessors using strict criteria for evaluability. The reasons for inadequate findings were assessed and ranked. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Insufficient contrast filling, especially of the anterior tibial, common femoral and iliac veins, was the most common reason for disqualifying examinations. Unilateral examinations and obscuring metallic devices were the second and third most common reasons, respectively. Efforts should be made to standardize the phlebography technique, to use a large volume of contrast without tourniquets, and to obtain an appropriate number of views to visualize the deep veins.

Percentage of inadequate phlebograms and observer agreement in thromboprophylactic multicenter trials using standardized methodology and central assessment.

This study examines inadequacy rates for phlebography in two multicenter trials for the prevention of post-operative DVT and determines inter-and intra-observer variability in evaluating phlebograms. A total of 991 (I) and 385 (II) patients underwent bilateral phlebography in two studies of thromboprophylaxis. Phlebography was performed using a standard method designed to visualize and assess all deep veins. Each vein was scored as normal, DVT or inadequate by both local and central assessment. The study showed low inadequacy rates for phlebograms of 12.2% (121/991) and 6.5% (25/385). Inter-observer agreement (local vs. central assessment) was moderate in both studies (I: 74.8%, Kappa-value 0.41; II: 82.6%, Kappa-value 0.51). Good intra-observer agreement (within the central assessment group) was observed (I:88.8%, Kappa-value 0.75). This study demonstrates low inadequacy rates for phlebograms using a standardized methodology and superior intra-observer agreement compared to inter-observer agreement and supports the importance of central assessment of phlebograms in thromboprophylactic multicenter trials to reduce observer variability.