Diagnostic and Treatment Obstacles in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Social, Operational, and Financial.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can affect individuals of all ages, but is more common in older adults. It has been estimated that AML accounted for 1% of all newly diagnosed cancers in the USA in 2022. The diagnostic process varies depending on the presenting symptoms and the healthcare facility that patients attend at diagnosis. The treatment process is long and prone to complications, requiring experienced medical professionals and appropriate infrastructure. Treatment of the disease did not change greatly over the years until 2017 when targeted therapies were licensed. The treatment of AML is associated with significant direct economic costs. A number of obstacles originating both from individual patients and the healthcare system may be encountered during the diagnosis and treatment of the disease, which may negatively impact the optimal management of the disease process. In this article, we focus primarily on the social, operational, and financial obstacles including the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic experienced during the diagnosis and treatment of AML.

Current evidence on the efficacy and safety of generic imatinib in CML and the impact of generics on health care costs.

Since the introduction of imatinib, the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has changed considerably. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the mainstay of CML treatment; however, the high financial burden of TKIs can be problematic for both the patients and health care systems. After the emergence of generics, reimbursement policies of many countries have changed, and generics offered an alternative treatment option for CML patients. There are many papers published on the use of generics in CML patients with conflicting results regarding both efficacy and safety. In this paper, we systematically reviewed the current literature on generic imatinib use in CML, and 36 papers were evaluated. Both in vitro and in vivo studies of generic imatinib showed comparable results with branded imatinib in terms of bioequivalence and bioavailability. In most studies, generics were comparable with the original molecule in terms of efficacy and safety, both in newly diagnosed patients and after switching from Gleevec. Some generic studies showed contradictory findings regarding efficacy and toxicity, and these differences can be attributed to some factors including the use of different generics in different countries. Both in hypothetical models and in real life, introduction of generic imatinib caused significant reduction in health care costs. In conclusion, generics are not inferior to original imatinib in terms of efficacy with an acceptable toxicity profile. Notwithstanding the generally favorable efficacy and safety of generics worldwide to date, we most probably still need more time to draw firmer conclusions on the longer-term outcomes of generics.

The prognostic value of serum levels of a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) in treatment-naïve patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Background/aim: A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) has been investigated as a prognostic marker in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. However, there is no cut-off level for serum APRIL (sAPRIL) levels that predict time to treatment in CLL patients. Materials and methods: Between May and December 2012, 94 consecutive CLL patients and 25 healthy controls were assessed. sAPRIL levels were measured by ELISA. Demographic data and prognostic markers were obtained from the patients' files. Treatment-naïve patients were followed up for 6.5 years for any treatment need. Results: Patients were divided into 3 groups: Treatment-naïve (n = 47), chemotherapy receiving (n = 25), and those who had received chemotherapy previously (n = 22). There was no difference in median sAPRIL levels of patients who were receiving chemotherapy at the sampling time and the healthy controls, which indicates that sAPRIL levels might be influenced by treatment. For treatment-naïve patients, the best cut-off in predicting time to treatment was found at the sAPRIL level of 2.04 ng/mL, with 78% sensitivity and 63% specificity. Time to treatment was significantly earlier in the APRIL high group (n = 27) than in the APRIL low group (n = 20) (P = 0.010, log-rank test). Conclusion: sAPRIL, a simple, promising blood test which can be measured by ELISA, will likely obtain a place in the wide range of prognostic markers in CLL. Prospective large-scale studies are required to validate and confirm the feasibility of the proposed cut-off level of 2.04 ng/mL as a predictor of time to treatment in treatment-naïve CLL patients.

Assessment and Monitoring of Patients with Immune-Mediated Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (iTTP): Strategies to Improve Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Acquired or immune-mediated TTP (iTTP) is a life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy, characterized by the presence of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and severe thrombocytopenia, and a variable degree of ischemic organ damage, related to a severe deficiency of ADAMTS13, which is a serine metalloprotease necessary for cleavage of large vWF multimers. There has been a dramatic decrease in mortality rates with the recognition of the pathophysiology of iTTP over the years. Although therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) together with corticosteroids are the backbone of the upfront treatment of patients with iTTP with successful outcomes, patients may remain refractory and/or relapse following an initial response to this treatment. METHODS: We performed a review regarding the pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment strategies, monitoring, and prognosis of iTTP. RESULTS: There are several new treatment strategies, which can be used among these patients, helping in improving outcomes of iTTP. Rituximab has been shown to be a safe and effective adjunct to TPE, especially in patients with refractory and/or relapse as well as it is increasingly used preemptively to prevent exacerbation or recurrence. Recently, caplacizumab, a nanobody targeting vWF, was approved as an addition to the current regimen of TPE and immunomodulation for patients of iTTP. CONCLUSION: Specific predictors of relapse in patients in remission can be relevant for an optimal patient management. Different models including ADAMTS13 biomarkers can provide a new screening strategy to identify patients who may predict outcomes and the risk of relapse, benefit from preemptive therapy prior to relapse.

Outcomes of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients With Early Molecular Response at 3 and 6 Months: A Comparative Analysis of Generic Imatinib and Glivec.

BACKGROUND: The molecular response at 3 months of the original imatinib (OI) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia has prognostic significance; however, this has never been tested for generic imatinib (GI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the BCR-ABL1 [international reporting scale (IS)] transcript levels at 3 and 6 months to determine whether an early molecular response (EMR) had a prognostic effect on the outcome among chronic myeloid leukemia patients receiving GI. Ninety patients were divided into 2 groups, according to the imatinib they received, as OI (group A) and GI (group B). RESULTS: Two groups were equally balanced for age, gender, Sokal risk score, and optimal response. The 2 groups did not differ in achieving an EMR at 3 months, and patients with EMR at 3 months had significantly superior complete cytogenetic response and major molecular response rates compared with patients who did not achieve an EMR in both groups. The percentage of an optimal response [BCR-ABL1 (IS), < 1%] and a warning response [BCR-ABL1 (IS), 1%-10%] at 6 months was 93% and 95% for groups A and B, respectively (P = .553). Patients with an optimal response (OR) at both 3 and 6 months had significantly superior event-free survival rates compared with patients without an OR in groups A and B. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study have demonstrated most probably for the first time that an OR at 3 and 6 months in patients receiving either first-line GI and OI is clearly associated with greater response and event-free survival rates. Prospective randomized trials with larger numbers of patients and longer follow-up periods are needed to address the effect of EMR in patients receiving GI.

Generics in chronic myeloid leukemia: current arguments for and against and the established evidence.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors became the mainstay of management in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. The substantially high treatment cost has unfortunately been a major issue. Recent market entry of the imatinib generics are expected to lower the price and increase the availability of the drug worldwide. However, concerns about their efficacy and safety seem to slacken the approval of the generics in many countries. In this editorial, we discuss the current evidence on imatinib generics based mainly on Turkish experience and other limited data available.