Sex Differences in the Recognition, Monitoring, and Management of CKD in Health Care: An Observational Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Reported sex differences in the etiology, population prevalence, progression rates, and health outcomes of people with CKD may be explained by differences in health care. METHODS: We evaluated sex as the variable of interest in a health care-based study of adults (n=227,847) with at least one outpatient eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 measurement denoting probable CKD in Stockholm from 2009 to 2017. We calculated the odds ratios for diagnosis of CKD and provision of RASi and statins at inclusion, and hazard ratios for CKD diagnosis, visiting a nephrologist, or monitoring creatinine and albuminuria during follow-up. RESULTS: We identified 227,847 subjects, of whom 126,289 were women (55%). At inclusion, women had lower odds of having received a diagnostic code for CKD and were less likely to have received RASi and statins, despite having guideline-recommended indications. In time-to-event analyses, women were less likely to have received a CKD diagnosis (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.45) and visited a nephrologist (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.48) regardless of disease severity, presence of albuminuria, or criteria for referral. Women were also less likely to undergo monitoring of creatinine or albuminuria, including those with diabetes or hypertension. These differences remained after adjustment for comorbidities, albuminuria, and highest educational achievement, and among subjects with confirmed CKD at retesting. Although in absolute terms all nephrology-care indicators gradually improved over time, the observed sex gap persisted. CONCLUSIONS: There were profound sex differences in the detection, recognition, monitoring, referrals, and management of CKD. The disparity was also observed in people at high risk and among those who had guideline-recommended indications. PODCAST: This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/JASN/2022_10_11_JASN2022030373.mp3.

Incidence, predictors and clinical management of hyperkalaemia in new users of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists.

BACKGROUND: Concerns for hyperkalaemia limit the use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). The frequency of MRA-associated hyperkalaemia in real-world settings and the extent of subsequent MRA discontinuation are poorly quantified. METHODS AND RESULTS: Observational study including all Stockholm citizens initiating MRA therapy during 2007-2010. Hyperkalaemias were identified from all potassium (K+ ) measurements in healthcare. MRA treatment lengths and dosages were obtained from complete collection of pharmacy dispensations. We assessed the 1-year incidence and clinical hyperkalaemia predictors, and quantified drug prescription changes after an episode of hyperkalaemia. Overall, 13 726 new users of MRA were included, with median age of 73 years, 53% women and median plasma K+ of 3.9 mmol/L. Within a year, 18.5% experienced at least one detected hyperkalaemia (K+ > 5.0 mmol/L), the majority within the first 3 monthsnthsnthsnthsnths of therapy. As a comparison, hyperkalaemia was detected in 6.4% of propensity-matched new beta-blocker users. Chronic kidney disease (CKD), older age, male sex, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes and concomitant use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers and diuretics were associated with increased hyperkalaemia risk. After hyperkalaemia, 47% discontinued MRA and only 10% reduced the prescribed dose. Discontinuation rates were higher after moderate/severe (K+ > 5.5 mmol/L) and early in therapy (<3 months from initiation) hyperkalaemias. CKD participants carried the highest risk of MRA discontinuation in adjusted analyses. When MRA was discontinued, most patients (76%) were not reintroduced to therapy during the subsequent year. CONCLUSION: Among real-world adults initiating MRA therapy, hyperkalaemia was very common and frequently followed by therapy interruption, especially among participants with CKD.

Prevalence and Risk of Protein-Energy Wasting Assessed by Subjective Global Assessment in Older Adults With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: Results From the EQUAL Study.

OBJECTIVES: Prevalence and risk factors for protein-energy wasting (PEW) are poorly studied in the nondialysis, older population with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence of PEW in advanced stage CKD patients aged greater than 65 years. Furthermore, we aimed to describe risk factors for PEW in the overall study population and among obese individuals. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. METHODS: The EQUAL study, a European Quality Study on treatment in advanced chronic kidney disease, is a multicenter prospective observational cohort study in six European countries. We included patients aged ≥65 years with incident glomerular filtration rate <20mL/min/1.73m2 not on dialysis attending nephrology care. PEW was assessed by 7-point Subjective Global Assessment (7-p SGA). RESULTS: In general, the study cohort (n = 1,334) was overweight (mean body mass index [BMI] 28.4 kg/m2). The majority of the patients had a normal nutritional status (SGA 6-7), 26% had moderate PEW (SGA 3-5), and less than 1% had severe PEW (SGA 1-2). Muscle wasting and loss of fat tissue were the most frequent alterations according to the SGA subscales, especially in those aged >80 years. The prevalence of PEW was higher among women, increased with age, and was higher in those with depression/dementia. PEW was the most common in those with underweight (BMI <22 kg/m2), 55% or normal weight (BMI 22-25 kg/m2), 40%. In obese individuals (BMI >30 kg/m2), 25% were diagnosed with protein wasting. Risk factors for SGA ≤5 in obese people were similar to those for the overall study population. CONCLUSION: This European multicenter study shows that the prevalence of PEW is high in patients with advanced CKD aged >65 years. The risk of PEW increases substantially with age and is commonly characterized by muscle wasting. Our study suggests that focus on nutrition should start early in the follow-up of older adults with CKD.

Multinational Assessment of Accuracy of Equations for Predicting Risk of Kidney Failure: A Meta-analysis.

IMPORTANCE: Identifying patients at risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression may facilitate more optimal nephrology care. Kidney failure risk equations, including such factors as age, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and calcium and phosphate concentrations, were previously developed and validated in 2 Canadian cohorts. Validation in other regions and in CKD populations not under the care of a nephrologist is needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of the risk equations across different geographic regions and patient populations through individual participant data meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Thirty-one cohorts, including 721,357 participants with CKD stages 3 to 5 in more than 30 countries spanning 4 continents, were studied. These cohorts collected data from 1982 through 2014. STUDY SELECTION: Cohorts participating in the CKD Prognosis Consortium with data on end-stage renal disease. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were obtained and statistical analyses were performed between July 2012 and June 2015. Using the risk factors from the original risk equations, cohort-specific hazard ratios were estimated and combined using random-effects meta-analysis to form new pooled kidney failure risk equations. Original and pooled kidney failure risk equation performance was compared, and the need for regional calibration factors was assessed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Kidney failure (treatment by dialysis or kidney transplant). RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 4 years of 721,357 participants with CKD, 23,829 cases kidney failure were observed. The original risk equations achieved excellent discrimination (ability to differentiate those who developed kidney failure from those who did not) across all cohorts (overall C statistic, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.89-0.92 at 2 years; C statistic at 5 years, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.86-0.90); discrimination in subgroups by age, race, and diabetes status was similar. There was no improvement with the pooled equations. Calibration (the difference between observed and predicted risk) was adequate in North American cohorts, but the original risk equations overestimated risk in some non-North American cohorts. Addition of a calibration factor that lowered the baseline risk by 32.9% at 2 years and 16.5% at 5 years improved the calibration in 12 of 15 and 10 of 13 non-North American cohorts at 2 and 5 years, respectively (P = .04 and P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Kidney failure risk equations developed in a Canadian population showed high discrimination and adequate calibration when validated in 31 multinational cohorts. However, in some regions the addition of a calibration factor may be necessary.