Unintentional recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries following thyroidectomy: Is it the surgeon who pays the bill?

BACKGROUND: Thyroidectomy is one of the most common intervention in general surgery and, after the turn of the century, its rate has sharply increased, along with a worldwide increased incidence of differentiated thyroid cancers. Therefore, injuries of the recurrent laryngeal nerve have become one of the most frequent cause of surgical malpractice claims, mostly following surgery for benign pathology. MAIN BODY: Even if the incidence of definitive paralysis is generally lower than 3%, during the last 20 years in Italy, the number of claims for damages has sharply raised. As a consequence, a lot of defensive medicine has been caused by this issue, and a witch-hunt has been accordingly triggered, so determining mostly a painful and lasting frustration for the surgeons, who sometimes are compelled to pay a lot of money for increasing insurance premiums and lawyers fees. Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury should be considered as a potentially catastrophic predictable but not preventable event, rather than the result of a surgical mistake. CONCLUSION: Purposes of the Authors are analyzing incidence, conditions of risk, and mechanisms of recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries, underlining notes of surgical technique and defining medical practice recommendations useful to reduce the risk of malpractice lawsuits and judgments against surgeons.

Assessment and clinical implications of RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway as markers of bone tumor progression in patients with NET harboring bone metastases.

INTRODUCTION: The impact on the survival of bone metastases (BM) in patients with neuroendocrine tumor (NET) is a matter of debate. BM have a key role in causing symptoms and in decreasing patients' quality of life. Although the mechanisms of the development of BM are not completely clear, it is now well understood that the Receptor Activator of Nuclear factor Kappa-B-/Ligand (RANK/RANKL)/osteoprotegerin (OPG) pathway plays a relevant role. AIM: To characterize the RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway in patients affected with NET. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two cohorts of 15 patients each were enrolled in the study; one cohort was affected with NET without BM and the second cohort was affected with NET with BM. The serum RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway was assessed in both the groups. RESULTS: Serum OPG levels and RANKL/OPG ratio were lower and higher, respectively, in NET patients harboring BM than in those without BM. During the ROC analysis, a cut-off value of 1071 pg/ml for OPG and 0.62 for RANKL/OPG ratio were able to significantly distinguish between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway is imbalanced in patients with NET harboring BM. Specific alterations of this pathway could predict an early development of BM.

Natural history of gastro-entero-pancreatic and thoracic neuroendocrine tumors. Data from a large prospective and retrospective Italian epidemiological study: the NET management study.

BACKGROUND: The few epidemiological data available in literature on neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are mainly based on Registry databases, missing therefore details on their clinical and natural history. AIM: To investigate epidemiology, clinical presentation, and natural history of NET. DESIGN AND SETTING: A large national retrospective survey was conducted in 13 Italian referral centers. Among 1203 NET, 820 originating in the thorax (T-NET), in the gastro-enteropancreatic tract (GEP-NET) or metastatic NET of unknown primary origin (U-NET) were enrolled in the study. RESULTS: 93% had a sporadic and 7% a multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1)-associated tumor; 63% were GEP-NET, 33% T-NET, 4% U-NET. Pancreas and lung were the commonest primary sites. Poorly differentiated carcinomas were <10%, all sporadic. The incidence of NET had a linear increase from 1990 to 2007 in all the centers. The mean age at diagnosis was 60.0 ± 16.4 yr, significantly anticipated in MEN1 patients (47.7 ± 16.5 yr). Association with cigarette smoking and other non-NET cancer were more prevalent than in the general Italian population. The first symptoms of the disease were related to tumor burden in 46%, endocrine syndrome in 23%, while the diagnosis was fortuity in 29%. Insulin (37%) and serotonin (35%) were the most common hormonal hypersecretions. An advanced tumor stage was found in 42%, more frequently in the gut and thymus. No differences in the overall survival was observed between T-NET and GEP-NET and between sporadic and MEN1-associated tumors at 10 yr from diagnosis, while survival probability was dramatically reduced in U-NET. CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained from this study furnish relevant information on epidemiology, natural history, and clinico-pathological features of NET, not available from the few published Register studies.

Resistance to cabergoline as compared with bromocriptine in hyperprolactinemia: prevalence, clinical definition, and therapeutic strategy.

To evaluate the prevalence of resistance to cabergoline treatment, we studied 120 consecutive de novo patients (56 macroadenoma, 60 microadenoma, 4 nontumoral hyperprolactinemia) treated with cabergoline (CAB) compared with 87 consecutive de novo patients (28 macroadenoma, 44 microadenoma, 15 nontumoral hyperprolactinemia) treated with bromocriptine (BRC) for 24 months. Resistance was evaluated as inability to normalize serum PRL levels (first end point) and to induce tumor shrinkage (second end point). After 24 months, PRL normalization and tumor shrinkage after CAB and BRC treatments, respectively, were obtained in 82.1% and 46.4% of macroprolactinomas (P < 0.001) and in 90% vs. 56.8% of microprolactinomas (P < 0.001). The median doses of CAB and BRC able to fulfill the two criteria of treatment success were 1 mg/wk and 7.5 mg/d in macroprolactinomas, 1 mg/wk and 5 mg/d in microprolactinomas, and 0.5 mg/wk and 3.75 mg/d in nontumoral hyperprolactinemia. Hyperprolactinemia persisted in 17.8% of macroprolactinomas, 10% of microprolactinomas, and after CAB at doses of 5-7 mg/wk and in 53.6% of macroprolactinomas, 43.2% of microprolactinomas, and 20% of nontumoral hyperprolactinemic patients, after BRC at doses of 15-20 mg/d. In these resistant macro- and microprolactinomas, the maximal tumor diameter was reduced by 43.7 +/- 3.6% and 22.1 +/- 3.7% and by 59.3 +/- 7.1% and 4.3 +/- 2.1% after CAB and BRC, respectively (P < 0.001). In conclusion, long-term CAB treatment induced the successful control of hyperprolactinemia associated with tumor shrinkage in a higher proportion of patients than did BRC treatment. In a small number of patients (i.e. 17.8% of macroprolactinomas and 10% of microprolactinomas), however, CAB treatment did not normalize serum PRL levels despite reducing tumor mass, even at very high doses. Therefore, an absence of tumor shrinkage cannot be considered as end point to indicate resistance to CAB, and increasing the dose of CAB higher than 3 mg/wk does not seem to be helpful in controlling PRL hypersecretion.