Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 20(6): 594-602, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35610112

RESUMO

The management of patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has been significantly modified by the availability of innovative but expensive treatments, increasing the economic burden of prostate cancer. Here, we aimed to systematically identify and review published economic evaluations (EEs) related to the treatment of mHSPC and assess their quality. A systematic search was performed of the PubMed and Cochrane databases. Three reviewers independently selected EEs by defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. They extracted all data from each EE (general information, study population, data about the EE, interventions and comparators, and outcomes). They also assessed the quality of the selected EEs according to Drummond's checklist. Fourteen EEs published between 2016 and 2021 were eligible for the systematic review. The EEs found ADT + docetaxel to be the most cost-effective of all available treatments as a first-line strategy for mHSPC (abiraterone acetate plus prednisone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide). Five EEs showed that a simple price reduction of abiraterone acetate of 50% to 75% could change the results to render this treatment also cost-effective relative to that with docetaxel. Twelve EEs were of high quality, with a Drummond score ≥ 7. Analysis of the 14 EEs identified by our systematic review, amongst which 78.6% met high quality standards, showed that ADT + docetaxel tends to be the most cost-effective alternative for mHSPC. These results were assessed by sensitivity analysis. The data provided by this systematic review help to provide a better understanding of these treatments and the better use of healthcare resources.


Assuntos
Acetato de Abiraterona , Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Docetaxel/uso terapêutico , Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Hormônios
2.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 69(10): 1947-1958, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32676716

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Scientific advances in the last decade have highlighted the use of immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, to be an effective strategy in cancer therapy. However, these immunotherapeutic agents are expensive, and their use must take into account economic criteria. Thus, the objective of the present study was to systematically identify and review published EE related to the use of ipilimumab, nivolumab or pembrolizumab in melanoma, lung cancer, head and neck cancer or renal cell carcinoma, and to assess their quality. METHODS: The systematic literature research was conducted on Medline via PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify economic evaluations published before July 2018. The quality of each selected economic evaluation was assessed by two independent reviewers using the Drummond checklist. RESULTS: Our systematic review was based on 32 economic evaluations using different methodological approaches, different perspectives and different time horizons. Three-quarters of the economic evaluations are full (n = 24) with a Drummond score ≥ 7, synonymous of "high quality". Among them, 66% reported a strategy that was cost-effective. The most assessed immunotherapeutic agent was nivolumab. In patients with renal cell carcinoma or head and neck cancer, it was less likely to be cost-effective than in patients with melanoma or lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Whether or not these findings will be confirmed remains to be seen when market approval to cover more indications is extended and new effective immunotherapeutic agents become available.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Imunoterapia/economia , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/economia , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Neoplasias/imunologia , Neoplasias/patologia , Prognóstico
3.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 50(3): 642-651, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32020515

RESUMO

Venous thromboembolism is highly prevalent in lung cancer patients. Low molecular weight heparins are recommended for long term treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism. Direct oral anticoagulants are however an interesting alternative as they are administered orally and don't require monitoring. There are currently studies comparing both their efficacy and tolerance for cancer patients and more and more guidelines suggest considering direct oral anticoagulants for cancer associated venous thromboembolism treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the budgetary impact that direct oral anticoagulants use would have for lung cancer associated venous thromboembolism treatment and prevention in France. An economic model was made to evaluate the cost of venous thromboembolism treatment and prevention among patients with primary lung cancer in France by two strategies: current guidelines versus direct oral anticoagulants use. The model was fed with clinical and economic data extracted from the French national health information system. The analysis was conducted from the national mandatory Health insurance point of view. The time horizon of the study was the evaluation of the annual management cost. Lung cancer associated venous thromboembolism management's mean cost was estimated of 836€ per patient, that is a total cost of about 40 million euros per year at a national level. A 76% decrease of this cost can be expected with direct oral anticoagulants use. However, despite their benefits, these treatments raise new issues (medication interactions, bleeding management), and would likely not be recommended for all patients.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Inibidores do Fator Xa/uso terapêutico , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicações , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Anticoagulantes/economia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Inibidores do Fator Xa/economia , França/epidemiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/economia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/economia , Tromboembolia Venosa/economia , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle
4.
Eur J Cancer ; 86: 207-216, 2017 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29024890

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The economic evaluation (EE) of healthcare interventions has become a necessity. However, high quality needs to be ensured in order to achieve validated results and help making informed decisions. Thus, the objective of the present study was to systematically identify and review published pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma-related EEs and to assess their quality. METHODS: Systematic literature research was conducted in PubMed and Cochrane to identify published EEs between 2000 and 2015. The quality of each selected EE was assessed by two independent reviewers, using the Drummond's checklist. RESULTS: Our systematic review was based on 32 EEs and showed a wide variety of methodological approaches, including different perspectives, time horizon, and cost effectiveness analyses. Nearly two-thirds of EEs are full EEs (n = 21), and about one-third of EEs had a Drummond score ≥7, synonymous with 'high quality'. Close to 50% of full EEs had a Drummond score ≥7, whereas all of partial EEs had a Drummond score <7 (n = 11). CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 15 years, a lot of interest has been evinced over the EE of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and its direct impact on therapeutic advances in PDAC. To provide a framework for health care decision-making, to facilitate transferability and to lend credibility to health EEs, their quality must be improved. For the last 4 years, a tendency towards a quality improvement of these studies has been observed, probably coupled with a context of rational decision-making in health care, a better and wider spread of recommendations and thus, medical practitioners' full endorsement.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/economia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Oncologia/economia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/economia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidade , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Modelos Econômicos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Trials ; 17(1): 531, 2016 11 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27881145

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Medical progress and the lifestyle modification have prolonged life expectancy, despite the development of chronic diseases. Support and care for older subjects are often provided by a network of informal caregivers composed of family, friends and neighbors, who are essential in helping older persons to continue living at home. It has been shown that the extent and diversity of informal tasks may jeopardize the physical, mental and social wellbeing of caregivers. METHODS/DESIGN: The aim of the Informal Carers of Elderly cohort is to define, through a longitudinal study, profiles of caregivers of older patients with a diagnosis of one of the following diseases: cancer (breast, prostate, colorectal), neurodegenerative diseases (Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease and similar diseases), neurovascular diseases (stroke), sensory diseases (age-related macular degeneration (AMD)) and heart disease (heart failure). Patients must be at least 60 years old and living in the region of Burgundy-Franche-Comte (France). By following the different phases of the caregiving relationship from the announcement of the diagnosis, it will be possible to assess the quality of life of caregivers, coping strategies, levels of anxiety and depression, social support and the extent of their burden. We will also evaluate the efficacy and efficiency of the implementation of a pragmatic intervention by a social worker to help informal caregivers, through a randomized interventional trial nested in the cohort. Qualitative approaches aimed at studying the caregiver/patient relationship, and situations leading to breakdown of the caregiver relationship will be also undertaken. DISCUSSION: Through an analytical and longitudinal definition of profiles of informal caregivers, this study will gather detailed information on their life courses and their health trajectory by identifying consequences associated with the concept of their role as carers. In addition, the randomized interventional trial will explore the relevance of the implementation of a supportive intervention by a social worker to help caregivers. These data will help to identify strategies that could be used to improve the existing sources of aid and to propose new approaches to help caregivers. This study will provide the opportunity to identify the most relevant means of support adapted to caregivers, and provide an impulse for new health care policies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02626377 . Retrospectively registered on 9 December 2015. Protocol date/version: 23 October 2014/version 2.


Assuntos
Envelhecimento , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Cuidadores/psicologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Doenças Neurodegenerativas/terapia , Apoio Social , Assistentes Sociais , Adaptação Psicológica , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Ansiedade/etiologia , Ansiedade/psicologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/psicologia , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/etiologia , Depressão/psicologia , Feminino , França , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Vida Independente , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/psicologia , Doenças Neurodegenerativas/diagnóstico , Doenças Neurodegenerativas/psicologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Qualidade de Vida , Projetos de Pesquisa , Fatores de Tempo
6.
Therapie ; 70(4): 359-68, 2015.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25899819

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The capsaïcine 8% cutaneous patch (Qutenza®) was recently approved for the management of patients with peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP). Considering its limited clinical efficacy data, its improvement of medical benefit was determined to be 5 which was insufficient to support its reimbursement in addition to diagnosis related groups'tarifs. Nevertheless its commercialization was associated with a marked interest considering the unmet therapeutic needs for patients with PNP. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to assess the effectiveness, the safety, and the economic impact of Qutenza® in real-life conditions. METHODS: An observational cost-consequences study was launched under the aegis of the Drug Committee of our hospital. Medical charts and prescriptions of all patients who received at least one patch application were analyzed. Effectiveness and safety were assessed after 12-week and 24-week of follow-up. The economic impact was measured within the Hospital and Health Insurance perspective and with limitation to direct costs. RESULTS: From March 2012 to October 2013, 91 patients (54.3 ± 14.1 years; 52.7% of male) received at least one application. The average follow- up duration was 188.3 ± 86.4 days. The PNP etiologies were mainly post-surgery (42.9%) and post-traumatology (20.8%). A therapeutic response (decrease of ENS score of least 30%) after 12 weeks and 24 weeks was observed in 27.9% and 37.1% of patients respectively. The SF-36 mental score was significantly improved. The safety profile was good. The application of the patch resulted in incremental costs of 154 euros per hospital stay without impact on outpatient-prescription drug expenditures. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the interest of Qutenza® for heavily pretreated, refractory patients with PNP. The clinical profile of responders has to be further investigated in large observational studies.


Assuntos
Capsaicina/administração & dosagem , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/tratamento farmacológico , Adesivo Transdérmico , Administração Cutânea , Adulto , Idoso , Capsaicina/efeitos adversos , Capsaicina/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/economia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/epidemiologia , Adesivo Transdérmico/efeitos adversos , Adesivo Transdérmico/economia
7.
Bull Cancer ; 98(6): 671-8, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21642049

RESUMO

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment in patients with unresectable non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). New drug eluting beads aim at improving efficacy of TACE in retaining as long as possible the anticancer drug within the tumor. Our monocentric study compares direct hospital medical costs, according to two different methods, for a first course of conventional TACE and for a first course of TACE using drug eluting beads in 30 patients with HCC. The average cost of a first course of conventional TACE valued by the analytic accounting system is 4 332 € versus 3 577 € for a first course of TACE using drug eluting beads. The average cost of a first course of conventional TACE valued by the official tariffs from the new French Diagnosis Related Group prospective payment system is 4 507 € (+175 €) versus 2 852 € (-725 €) for a first course of TACE using drug eluting beads. Our study shows that a first TACE using drug eluting beads, valued by the official tariffs from the new French Diagnosis Related Group prospective payment system, is significantly (p  =  0.006) less expensive than a first conventional TACE.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioembolização Terapêutica/economia , Preços Hospitalares , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Microesferas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Quimioembolização Terapêutica/métodos , Custos Diretos de Serviços , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos/economia , Feminino , França , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
8.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 27(1): 55-68, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19178124

RESUMO

The GOELAMS 072 study showed that first-line high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) with peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) support was superior to the standard chemotherapy regimen (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone; CHOP) in adults with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The aim of the study was to evaluate the pharmacoeconomic profile of HDT with PBSCT support relative to standard CHOP therapy as first-line treatment in adults with aggressive NHL. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis from the French Public Health Insurance perspective, restricted to hospital costs (euro, year 2008 values). The clinical effectiveness criterion was censured overall survival (OS) difference after a median follow-up of 4 years for the entire cohort. A total of 197 patients were included (CHOP, n = 99; HDT, n = 98). Uncertainty was assessed using non-parametric bootstrap simulations and various scenario analyses. Five-year OS did not differ significantly between groups for the entire cohort. Nevertheless, subgroup analyses appeared to be more relevant for decision making: among patients with a high-intermediate risk according to the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI), HDT yielded a significantly higher 5-year OS than CHOP (74% vs 44%; p = 0.001). Among these patients, the mean censured OS survival, adjusted for time discounting and quality of life (QOL), increased with HDT by 1.20 years (95% CI 1.19, 1.21). The cost per life-year saved with HDT was estimated as euro34 315 (95% CI 32 683, 35 947) in this subgroup. Results suggested that HDT with PBSCT support might be considered a cost-effective strategy among patients with high-intermediate-risk NHL according to the age-adjusted IPI. Its place and its cost effectiveness potential versus, or in combination with, rituximab still need further research.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Linfoma não Hodgkin/economia , Linfoma não Hodgkin/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco de Sangue Periférico/economia , Adulto , Ciclofosfamida/economia , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Doxorrubicina/economia , Doxorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prednisolona/economia , Prednisolona/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores de Tempo , Transplante Autólogo/economia , Vincristina/economia , Vincristina/uso terapêutico
9.
Bull Cancer ; 93(8): 813-9, 2006 Aug.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16935786

RESUMO

The confrontation of the macro- and micro-economic approaches of hospital costs is a recurrent question, in particular for pathologies where length of stay is highly variable, like acute myeloid leukemias (AML). This monocentric and retrospective study compares direct hospital medical costs of induction and relapse treatment sequences for AML, valued according to four different approaches: the analytic accounting system of our hospital, the French Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) cost databases of hospital discharges (readjusted, or not, to actual hospital stay duration), and official tariffs from the new French DRG prospective payment system. The average cost of hospital AML care valued by the analytic accounting system of our hospital is 61,248 euros for the induction phase and 91,702 euros for the relapse phase. All other national valuation methods result in a two- to four-fold underestimation of these costs. Even though AMLs are now individualized in the 10th version of the French diagnosis related group (DRG) classification, the impact of this issue in other pathologies is going to increase with the gradual implementation of the French DRG prospective payment system. That is why it must be assessed before the progressive extension of this financing system.


Assuntos
Custos Hospitalares , Leucemia Mieloide/economia , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo/economia , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economia , Feminino , França , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Leucemia Mieloide/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Indução de Remissão , Estudos Retrospectivos
10.
Support Care Cancer ; 14(10): 1030-7, 2006 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16802128

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Anaemia is a common toxicity in cancer patients and epoetins (EPOs) are now an established treatment. The economic profile of EPO treatment was assessed in patients with breast cancer treated by adjuvant-chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two strategies were compared: without treatment by EPO and with the possible use of treatment by EPO (epoetin alfa) when required. The clinical effectiveness criterion was time adjusted to quality of life and economic data included only direct medical costs. MAIN RESULTS: One hundred ninety-two patients were included. In the group with the strategy containing the possible use of EPO, 45.5% of patients effectively received EPO. A significant difference in the haemoglobin level profile over time was observed which provided a significant overall benefit of 0.0052 (p<10(-4)) quality-adjusted life year (QALY) associated with an extra cost of 1,615 (p<10(-4)). In the base case analysis, the cost per added QALY was estimated as 310,577 with the strategy containing the possible use of EPO. CONCLUSION: This robust result seems to be unacceptable, but the only relevant point of discussion might be the level of acceptable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for a patient.


Assuntos
Anemia/tratamento farmacológico , Anemia/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Eritropoetina/economia , Eritropoetina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Anemia/induzido quimicamente , Biomarcadores/sangue , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Análise Custo-Benefício , Ciclofosfamida/efeitos adversos , Doxorrubicina/efeitos adversos , Epirubicina/efeitos adversos , Epoetina alfa , Feminino , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , França , Hematínicos/economia , Hematínicos/uso terapêutico , Hemoglobinas/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Proteínas Recombinantes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA