[Assessment of the man in the infertile couple]. / Évaluation de l'homme du couple infertile.

BACKGROUND: Among couples consulting for infertility, there is a male component, either alone or associated with a female aetiology in around one in 2 cases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Bibliographic search in PubMed using the keywords "male infertility", "diagnosis", "management" and "evaluation" limited to clinical articles in English and French prior to 1/01/2023. RESULTS: The AFU recommends: (1) a complete medical history including: family history, patient history affecting fertility, lifestyle habits (toxicity), treatments, symptoms, sexual dysfunctions; (2) a physical examination including: BMI, signs of hypogonadism, secondary sexual characteristics, scrotal examination (volume and consistency of testes, vas deferens, epididymal or testicular nodules, presence of varicocele); (3) two spermograms, if abnormal on the first; (4) a systematic scrotal ultrasound,± an endorectal ultrasound depending on the clinic; (5) a hormonal work-up (testosterone, FSH; if testosterone is low: LH assay to differentiate between central or peripheral hypogonadism); (6) karyotype if sperm concentration≤10 million/mL; (7) evaluation of Y chromosome microdeletions if concentration≤1 million/mL; (8) evaluation of the CFTR gene in cases of suspected bilateral or unilateral agenesis of the vas deferens and seminal vesicles. The role and usefulness of direct and indirect tests to assess the effects of oxidative stress on sperm DNA will also be explained. CONCLUSION: This review complements and updates the AFU/SALF 2021 recommendations.

[Male contraception]. / Contraception masculine.

CONTEXT: Contraception is a major global health issue, which is still dominated by female contraception. Developments in male contraception could help redistribute the contraceptive burden. METHODS: A literature search was carried out to review the existing options and the criteria for optimal contraception, to establish the principles of a male pre-contraception consultation, and to review the various research avenues with their advantages and disadvantages. RESULTS: The new male contraception options are detailed, whether hormonal (androgen therapy, combination of progestins and testosterone) or non-hormonal, particularly thermal, with current results and avenues for improvement. Condom use and vasectomy remain the only 2 validated options. The recent development of minimally invasive vasectomy without the need for a scalpel and of occlusion techniques has simplified the procedure, minimised the risk of complications (pain, haematomas, post-vasectomy pain syndrome) and improved efficacy. The issues of regret and the possibility of repermeabilisation are also raised. CONCLUSION: The question of male contraception will become increasingly important in consultations with urologists. The urologist will have to inform the patient, as required by law, before the vasectomy is performed, and provide the best possible advice on the technique, which will often be minimally invasive without the need for a scalpel. New reversible options should also broaden the range of options available on a routine basis, with a view to gradually moving towards contraceptive equity.

[French Urological Association (AFU) guidelines for Peyronie's disease assessment and treatment]. / Recommandations pour l'évaluation et la prise en charge de la maladie de Lapeyronie : rapport du comité d'andrologie et de médecine sexuelle de l'AFU.

INTRODUCTION: Peyronie's disease is a common cause for consultation in urology. Many controversies surround its treatment. No French Guidelines have been published so far. The Committee of Andrology and Sexual Medicine of the French Association of Urology therefore offers a series of evidence-based recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: These recommendations are made according to the ADAPTE method, based on European (EAU, ESSM), American (AUA, ISSM) and Canadian (CAU) recommendations, integrating French specificities due to the availability of treatments, and an update of the recent bibliography. RESULTS: The assessment of the disease is clinical. Patients with functional impairment or significant psychological repercussions may be offered treatment. The benefits and drawbacks of each treatment should be explained to the patient. Regarding non-surgical treatments, no available treatment has market authorization in France. Vitamin E is not recommended. Analgesic (oral or low-intensity shock waves) or proerectile treatments may be offered as needed, as well as traction therapy. Due to the unavailability of collagenase injections, verapamil injections may be offered. Surgical treatments are to be considered in the stabilized phase of the disease, and consist of performing a plication, an incision-graft or the placement of a penile implant according to the patient's wishes, the curvature and the penis size, as well as erectile function. Combination treatments can be offered. CONCLUSION: The management of Peyronie's disease is complex, and the levels of evidence for treatments are generally low. The success of treatment will depend on the quality of the initial assessment, the patient's information and understanding of the expected effects, and the practitioner's experience.

Perioperative and economic analysis of surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: A study of the French committee on LUT.

PURPOSE: To evaluate perioperative cost related to surgical treatments of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO): photoselective vaporization of the prostate (pvp), holmium/thullium laser enucleation (HoLEP/ThuLEP), transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and open prostatectomy (OP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from 237 patients who consecutively underwent a surgical treatment for BPH between January 2012 and June 2013 at nine institutions in France. An economic simulation model was constructed to estimate the cost of hospitalization related to surgical procedure from the hospital perspective and a cost minimization analysis was performed. RESULTS: TURP, OP, HoLEP/ThuLEP and PVP were performed in 99 (42%), 23 (10%), 64 (27%) and 51 (21%) patients, respectively. For men with prostate size<80mL: mean operative time was shorter with mTURP and PVP than HoLEP/thuLEP (P<0.001); Mean postoperative length of stay were 1.9, 3 vs. 3.4 days, for HoLEP/Thulep, PVP and TURP respectively (P=0.006); Costs of first hospitalization were comparable between HoLEP/ThuLEP and TURP but higher with PVP (P<0.001). For men with prostate size≥80mL: Compared to PVP and HoLEP/ThuLEP, OP was associated with shorter operative time (P<0.001) but longer length of stay (2.4, 4.2 vs. 7.8 days, respectively, P<0.0001); Costs of first hospitalization were significantly higher with OP than HoLEP/ThuLEP or PVP (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PVP and HoLEP/ThuLEP were associated with a shorter LOS than TURP and OP. This benefit suggests these procedures could be more cost effective than OP, but still not cheaper alternatives to TURP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

[Medicoeconomic aspects of benign prostatic hyperplasia medical treatment]. / Aspects médicoéconomiques des traitements médicamenteux de l'hypertrophie bénigne de la prostate : une revue de la littérature du Comité des troubles mictionnels de l'homme de l'Association française d'urologie.

INTRODUCTION: The medicoeconomic issues of drug management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are essential due to the aging population and the increasing number of therapeutic options. It is thus essential to assess the cost-effectiveness in order to define the most appropriate therapeutic strategies economically. The objective of this work was to conduct a literature review on the medicoeconomic studies on the drug therapy of BPH. METHOD: After analyzing the literature, 43 articles were found and 9 were selected for their relevance. RESULTS: Based on Markov models, we observed that: combination therapy and combined treatments (alphablockers and inhibitors of 5-alpha reductase [5ARI]) seemed to have the best cost-effectiveness. Then came the alphablockers, less expensive but exposing to a greater risk of progression and to the necessity of surgical treatments. Then came the 5ARI monotherapy and finally simple monitoring. CONCLUSION: The Markov models are imperfect tools, and resources invested in care depend on both the economic model and the value that individuals and society give to efficiency and cost.

[Initial assessment of male non-neurogenic incontinence: systematic review of the literature by the LUTS committee of the French Urological Association]. / Bilan initial d'une incontinence urinaire masculine (non neurologique): revue de la littérature du CTMH de l'AFU.

PURPOSE: To perform an update on the initial evaluation of male urinary incontinence (MUI). METHOD: A systematic review was conducted using Pubmed/Medline from 1995 to 2013. RESULTS: Definition of MUI and its prevalence is variable according its definition and the population. Tools for its evaluation have been mainly studied in female population or only in patients with UI after radical prostatectomy. Objectives of the initial evaluation are to assess the type of incontinence, to evaluate its severity and the bother associated, and define the choice of treatment. Medical history, clinical assessment, and urine analysis are the first steps of the evaluation. Bladder diary, questionnaires and pad test can be useful to evaluate MUI. Post-void residual volume assessment is necessary if lower urinary tract symptoms are associated. Imaging is not routinely used in MUI. A specialist referral and further investigations such as urethrocystoscopy and urodynamics should be considered in case of invasive treatment, recurrent incontinence and specific situations. CONCLUSIONS: Initial assessment of MUI should be sequential with systematic investigations and optional ones.

[Initial assessment, follow-up and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia: guidelines of the LUTS committee of the French Urological Association]. / Bilan initial, suivi et traitement des troubles mictionnels en rapport avec hyperplasie bénigne de prostate : recommandations du CTMH de l'AFU.

AIM: To elaborate guidelines for the diagnosis, the follow-up, and the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to select more relevant publications. The level of evidence was evaluated. Graded recommendations were written by a working group, and then reviewed by a reviewer group according to the formalized consensus technique. RESULTS: Terminology of the International Continence Society was used. Initial assessment has several aims: making sure that lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are related to BPH, assessing bother related to LUTS and checking for a possible complicated bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Initial assessment should include: medical history, LUTS assessment using a symptomatic score, physical examination including digital rectal examination, urinalysis, flow rate recording, and residual urine volume. Frequency volume chart is recommended when storage symptoms are predominant. Serum PSA should be done when the diagnosis of prostate cancer can modify the management. When a surgical treatment is discussed, serum PSA, serum creatinine and ultrasonography of the urinary tract are recommended. BPH patients should be informed of the benign and possibly progressive patterns of the disease. When LUTS cause no bother, annual follow-up should be planned. Medical treatment includes some phytotherapy agents, alpha-blockers and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors. The last two can be associated. The association of antimuscarinics and alpha-blockers can be offered to patients with residual storage symptoms when already under alpha-blockers therapy, after checking for the absence of severe BOO (residual volume more than 200mL or max urinary flow less than 10mL/s). Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors could be used in patients complaining for both LUTS and erectile dysfunction. In case of complication, or when medical treatment is inefficient or not tolerated, then a surgical treatment should be discussed. Treatment decision should be done according to type of LUTS and related bother, prostate anatomy, level of obstruction and its consequences on urinary tract, patient co-morbidities, experience of practitioner, and choice of patient. Surgical treatments with the higher level of evidence of efficacy include monopolar or bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate, open prostatectomy, transurethral incision of the prostate, photoselective vaporization of the prostate, and Holmium laser enuclation of the prostate. CONCLUSION: Here are the first guidelines of the French Urological Association for the initial assessment, the follow-up and the treatment of urinary disorders related to BPH.

[Clinical and para-clinical assessment of Peyronie's disease: Place of questionnaires and penile duplex ultrasound]. / Évaluation clinique et paraclinique de la maladie de Lapeyronie : place des questionnaires et du pharmaco-doppler pénien.

PURPOSE: Assessment of the Peyronie's disease (PD) is clinical in absence of validated questionnaire or of para-clinical standardized test. The international index of erectile function (IIEF) and Lue's score are used for the clinical evaluation. Penile dynamic duplex ultrasound (PDU) was considered in the 2010 recommendations as "useful but not necessary test". The objective of this study was to estimate the utility of the scores and of the PDU in the diagnostic and in the therapeutic decision at the patients suffering from a PD. PATIENTS: Twenty-one patients were included in this forward-looking single-center study over 12 months. All the patients had a clinical examination with photos, an evaluation using the IIEF-5 and the Lue's score and a PDU. RESULTS: The average age was of 57.7 years (34-77) with an average evolution duration of 38.9 months. IIEF-5 was not adapted to the assessment of the preoperative erectile function of the PD because the questions 3 to 5 were modified by the penil deformity. The result of Lue's score did not seem to us to have interest in the therapeutic decision because it is not recommended to operate a patient in evolution. Plaques were classified according to ultrasonographic patterns : presence of hyperechoic or/and calcified lesion. The application of relevant differential ultrasound criteria turned out delicate. The PDU found abnormalities of the vascular flows for 61.9 % of the patients. Nine patients were operated and PDU modified the surgical gesture for two of them. CONCLUSION: The search for objective criteria of evaluation of the PD is essential, but those currently proposed, clinical or ultrasound seemed to us a little adapted or difficult to apply.