Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Urolithiasis ; 41(2): 159-63, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23503878

RESUMO

This study was designed to evaluate ureterovesical jet dynamics in obstructed ureter and to compare it with those of contralateral unobstructed side. Forty-six patients with diagnosis of ureteral stone, based on imaging findings in computed tomography were enrolled in this study. The gray-scale ultrasound exam from both kidneys and urinary bladder was performed. Then, ureterovesical jet characteristics including ureteral jet frequency, duration and peak velocity were assessed by color Doppler and duplex Doppler studies in both obstructed and unobstructed ureters by a radiologist, 15-30 min after oral hydration with 750-1,000 mL of water. When compared with contralateral normal side, the ureterovesical jet in obstructed ureter showed less frequency (0.59 vs. 3.04 jets/min; P < 0.05), shorter duration (1.24 vs. 5.26 s; P < 0.05) and lower peak velocity (5.41 vs. 32.09 cm/s; P < 0.05). The cut-off points of 1.5 jets/min, 2.5 s and 19.5 cm/s for difference of ureteral jet frequency, duration and peak velocity between obstructed and contralateral normal ureters yielded sensitivities of 97.8, 95.6 and 100 % and specificities of 87, 87.9 and 97.8 %, respectively for diagnosis of ureteral obstruction. Given the safety of Doppler study and significant differences in flow dynamics of obstructed versus unobstructed ureters, our findings demonstrated the utility of Doppler ultrasound examination as a useful adjunct to gray-scale ultrasound by improving the accuracy of ultrasound exam in diagnosis of ureteral obstruction.


Assuntos
Cálculos Ureterais/diagnóstico por imagem , Obstrução Ureteral/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Hidrodinâmica , Hidronefrose/diagnóstico por imagem , Hidronefrose/etiologia , Hidronefrose/urina , Rim/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ultrassonografia Doppler em Cores , Ultrassonografia Doppler Dupla , Cálculos Ureterais/complicações , Cálculos Ureterais/urina , Obstrução Ureteral/etiologia , Obstrução Ureteral/urina , Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto Jovem
2.
Acta Med Iran ; 49(12): 789-94, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22174166

RESUMO

The previous large retrospective studies demonstrated that treatment with Statins reduces both the incidence of prostate cancer by 50% and serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) level up to 40%. However the main problem in those studies was the absence of control groups of men with hypercholesterolemia without Statin treatment. We performed a small prospective controlled clinical trial to assess the influence of the treatment with Atorvastatin on serum PSA in men with hypercholesterolemia referred to our educational and treatment center from October 2007 to March 2008. In this study, among the newly diagnosed males with hypercholesterolemia (LDL > 130 mg/dl), 40 patients with LDL more than 190 mg/dl were selected as a case group and were treated with Atorvastatin (20 mg/day). Among the same population and in the same period, another 40 patients with LDL between 130 and 190 mg/dl were selected as first control group and were treated only with low fat diet. Another 40 patients with normal serum cholesterol and without any treatment were selected as second control group. The lipid profile and serum PSA level of patients of all groups were tested at the first and third months after the therapy. After completion of data, the mean serum lipids and PSA level were measured in both visits and compared with each other by paired t-test. Also the mean PSA change in two visits between three groups was compared by ANOVA and Tukey HSD test. There was not any significant difference in mean baseline PSA between hypercholesterolemic and normocholesterolemic patients (P=0.547). In case group, mean PSA and LDL was reduced by 14.1% (P=0.0001) and 30% (P=0.0001) respectively by second visit. In first control group, mean PSA was not changed significantly (P=0.337), whereas mean LDL in this group was reduced by 9.6% (P= 0.0001). Similarly in the second control group mean PSA was not changed significantly (P=0.309) by second visit. In addition, mean change of PSA in case group was compared with first and second control groups that was significantly different (P=0.0001) whereas mean change of PSA between two control groups was not significantly different (P=0.615). The results of this study showed that: 1) Short term treatment with Atorvastatin can reduce serum PSA level, and 2) This reduction is more likely to be due to direct effect and is not related to lowering serum cholesterol levels. Thus, if results of this study are confirmed by large prospective randomized clinical trials with longer follow up period, it will be possible that Atorvastatin could be used in long term as a safe chemoprophylactic agent against prostate cancer in high risk patients.


Assuntos
Ácidos Heptanoicos/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Hipercolesterolemia/tratamento farmacológico , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Atorvastatina , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Humanos , Hipercolesterolemia/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Triglicerídeos/sangue
3.
Urology ; 75(3): 540-2, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19962730

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of the combination of intranasal desmopressin spray and diclofenac sodium suppository on acute renal colic and compare it with diclofenac sodium suppository alone. METHODS: A total of 150 patients aged 15-65 years referred to our hospital with acute renal colic were included in a double-blind controlled clinical trial study. Patients in group 1 received desmopressin, 40 microg intranasally plus diclofenac sodium suppository 100 mg, and patients in group 2 received diclofenac sodium suppository 100 mg plus a placebo spray consisting of normal saline 0.9%. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the pain scores at 15 and 30 minutes between the 2 groups (P < .05). Also, significant differences were found in the mean pain scores in the first 15 and first 30 minutes after treatment between the 2 groups (P < .05). Of the patients in group 1, 37.3% had no pain relief and required pethidine. However, this rate in group 2 was 69.3%. In 17 cases, we prescribed pethidine within 20 minutes after treatment, and these patients were excluded from our study. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, intranasal desmopressin plus diclofenac sodium suppository caused prompt pain relief with significant decreases in pain scores after 15 and 30 minutes. We suggest that intranasal desmopressin spray is a useful supplemental therapy for renal colic in combination with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, especially to reduce the use of opioids.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Antidiuréticos/administração & dosagem , Desamino Arginina Vasopressina/administração & dosagem , Diclofenaco/administração & dosagem , Cólica Renal/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Intranasal , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Supositórios , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA