Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Hepatol ; 76(3): 619-627, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34774638

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In Italy, since August 2014, liver transplant (LT) candidates with model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores ≥30 receive national allocation priority. This multicenter cohort study aims to evaluate time on the waiting list, dropout rate, and graft survival before and after introducing the macro-area sharing policy. METHODS: A total of 4,238 patients registered from 2010 to 2018 were enrolled and categorized into an ERA-1 Group (n = 2,013; before August 2014) and an ERA-2 Group (n = 2,225; during and after August 2014). A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of receiving a LT or death between the two eras. The Fine-Gray model was used to estimate the HR for dropout from the waiting list and graft loss, considering death as a competing risk event. A Fine-Gray model was also used to estimate risk factors of graft loss. RESULTS: Patients with MELD ≥30 had a lower median time on the waiting list (4 vs.12 days, p <0.001) and a higher probability of being transplanted (HR 2.27; 95% CI 1.78-2.90; p = 0.001) in ERA-2 compared to ERA-1. The subgroup analysis on 3,515 LTs confirmed ERA-2 (odds ratio 0.56; 95% CI 0.46-0.68; p = 0.001) as a protective factor for better graft survival rate. The protective variables for lower dropouts on the waiting list were: ERA-2, high-volume centers, no competition centers, male recipients, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The protective variables for graft loss were high-volume center and ERA-2, while MELD ≥30 remained related to a higher risk of graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: The national MELD ≥30 priority allocation was associated with improved patient outcomes, although MELD ≥30 was associated with a higher risk of graft loss. Transplant center volumes and competition among centers may have a role in recipient prioritization and outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT04530240 LAY SUMMARY: Italy introduced a new policy in 2014 to give national allocation priority to patients with a model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score ≥30 (i.e. very sick patients). This policy has led to more liver transplants, fewer dropouts, and shorter waiting times for patients with MELD ≥30. However, a higher risk of graft loss still burdens these cases. Transplant center volumes and competition among centers may have a role in recipient prioritization and outcomes.


Assuntos
Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/normas , Estudos de Coortes , Doença Hepática Terminal/epidemiologia , Doença Hepática Terminal/mortalidade , Doença Hepática Terminal/cirurgia , Feminino , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/fisiologia , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Política de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Itália , Transplante de Fígado/reabilitação , Transplante de Fígado/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Seleção de Pacientes , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de Risco , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/métodos , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/estatística & dados numéricos , Listas de Espera/mortalidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA