Discordant results in 18F-FDG PET/CT and ultrasound-based assessment for axillary lymph node metastasis detection: A large retrospective analysis in 560 patients with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Ultrasound is the recommended modality to assess axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer; nevertheless, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) diagnostic efficiency, to identify suspicious lesions, is also considered. We aim to report discrepancies in ultrasound and 18F-FDG PET/CT results. METHODS: This single-centered retrospective analysis selected consecutive patients with invasive ductal biopsy-proven breast cancer, for whom divergent 18F-FDG PET/CT and axillary ultrasound imaging (and/or core needle biopsy if available) had been performed, and described clinical, histological, imaging, and surgery data. RESULTS: This retrospective study included 560 patients and identified discordant results between 18F-FDG PET/CT and ultrasound (suspicious 18F-FDG PET/CT and normal ultrasound imaging and/or core needle biopsy) in 20 (4%) patients. Axillary lymph node involvement was confirmed in 17 (85%) out of these 20 patients. Further, the lymph nodes were smaller than one centimeter in 12 (60%) patients, macrometastasic involvement (involvement >2 mm) was detected in 13 (65%) patients, and more than 3 macrometastases were detected in 6 (30%) patients. All patients had an aggressive breast cancer. The sentinel node biopsy performed in 9 (45%) patients allowed to reveal lymph node involvement, even in cases of macrometastatic involvement. CONCLUSION: Discordant results were issued from normal ultrasound imaging and/or core needle biopsy, and suspicious 18F-FDG PET/CT revealed that 18F-FDG PET/CT may overcome axillary ultrasound limits in the specific case of aggressive breast cancers, especially for axillary lymph nodes smaller than 1 centimeter. Sentinel node biopsy remains a valuable aid, even in patients with macrometastatic involvement.

Management of patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia by vacuum-assisted core biopsy: a prospective assessment of the guidelines used at our institution.

BACKGROUND: Because of underestimation, surgical excision is recommended for atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed on directional vacuum-assisted biopsies. The following guidelines have been established according to our retrospective study published in 2008: excision for lesions ≥ 21 mm, follow-up for lesions <6 mm with complete removal of microcalcifications, and follow-up or excision for 6 to 21-mm lesions with respectively less or >2 atypical ductal hyperplasia foci. METHODS AND RESULTS: These guidelines were assessed in a prospective series of 124 patients with a median follow-up of 30 months. Conformity rate was 92%. Upgrading was 28% (15 of 53 patients) for conformed surgery and absent for surgery performed beyond the scope of guidelines. For the patients with benign result at surgery (n = 38) or just followed (n = 61), 3 cancers occurred in either breast at 1 to 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: These convenient guidelines can safely spare surgery for a subset of patients. However, annual mammographic follow-up is recommended since the risk of subsequent cancer remains high for both breasts.

Multidisciplinarity and medical decision, impact for patients with cancer: sociological assessment of two tumour committees' organization.

PURPOSE: Medical practices in oncology are expected to be multidisciplinary, yet few articles studied how this may be concretely applied. In the present study, we evaluated the organization of two multidisciplinary committees, one for breast cancer and one for sarcoma, in a French Comprehensive Cancer Centre. METHODS: Both tumours were specifically chosen so as to emphasise substantial differences in relation with incidence, histological subtypes, management strategy, and scientific evidence. Between 2003 and 2004, 404 decision processes were observed, 210 for sarcoma (26 meetings) and 194 for breast cancer (10 meetings). The number of physicians who took part in the discussions and their medical specialties were systematically noted as well as the number of contradictory discussions, medical specialties represented in these contradictory discussions and the topics of contradiction. The last measured data was whether the final committee's decision was in conformity with the referent preferences or not. All these measures were related to the referent's medical speciality and working place, to the stage of the disease and to the disease management stage. RESULTS: Committees' specificities concerned their organization, referent's medical specialties, the number of participants in discussions and their medical specialties. Discussions in the sarcoma committee tended to be more multidisciplinary, involving more specialties. Initial strategy proposal for one patient was modified during the discussions for 86 patients out of 210 (41%) and for 62 out of 194 (32%) respectively for sarcoma and breast cancer. However, there was no significant difference in the rate of contradictory discussions between breast cancer and sarcoma committees (32% versus 41% respectively; P = 0.08). The rates of contradictory discussions were similar for localized cancers, local relapse and metastasis disease (37%, 41% and 34% respectively; P = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: The present study reports more than 30% of changes concerning strategy for patient with cancer due to multidisciplinary discussions. This indicates that, providing tumour committees are adapted to the pathologies' characteristics, they can promote a collective and multidisciplinary approach to oncology.