Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Br J Cancer ; 128(9): 1710-1722, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36828871

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Establishing the existence of health inequalities remains a high research and policy agenda item in the United Kingdom. We describe ethnic and socio-economic differences in paediatric cancer survival, focusing specifically on the extent to which disparities have changed over a 20-year period. METHODS: Cancer registration data for 2674 children (0-14 years) in Yorkshire were analysed. Five-year survival estimates by ethnic group (south Asian/non-south Asian) and Townsend deprivation fifths (I-V) were compared over time (1997-2016) for leukaemia, lymphoma, central nervous system (CNS) and other solid tumours. Hazard ratios (HR: 95% CI) from adjusted Cox models quantified the joint effect of ethnicity and deprivation on mortality risk over time, framed through causal interpretation of the deprivation coefficient. RESULTS: Increasing deprivation was associated with significantly higher risk of death for children with leukaemia (1.11 (1.03-1.20)) and all cancers between 1997 and 2001. While we observed a trend towards reducing differences in survival over time in this group, a contrasting trend was observed for CNS tumours whereby sizeable variation in outcome remained for cases diagnosed until 2012. South Asian children with lymphoma had a 15% reduced chance of surviving at least 5 years compared to non-south Asian, across the study period. DISCUSSION: Even in the United Kingdom, with a universally accessible healthcare system, socio-economic and ethnic disparities in childhood cancer survival exist. Findings should inform where resources should be directed to provide all children with an equitable survival outcome following a cancer diagnosis.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central , Leucemia , Criança , Humanos , Etnicidade , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos
2.
Diabet Med ; 23(1): 86-9, 2006 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16409571

RESUMO

AIMS: Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) are now responsible for the planning and delivery of health-care services throughout England and Wales. As the 25 PCTs throughout Yorkshire are representative of the national distribution in terms of population structure and socio-economic status, we aimed to address the paucity of information describing the burden of childhood diabetes in primary care and to evaluate the cost implications of insulin pump therapy on individual PCTs. METHODS: We extracted information from a population-based register in Yorkshire, including 1952 patients diagnosed under the age of 15 years from 1990 to 2003. Each patient's postcode was linked to an individual PCT. Incidence rates (per 100 000 patient years) were derived and assessed for evidence of heterogeneity across PCTs and within Strategic Health Authorities (SHAs). RESULTS: Incidence rates were lower in West Yorkshire (19.1, 95% CI 18.0-20.2) than North-east Yorkshire (20.3, 18.9-21.6), although this difference was not significant (P = 0.20). No significant evidence of heterogeneity in incidence rates was observed across PCTs (P = 0.46). Ninety per cent of all PCTs would expect four to seven newly diagnosed children per year, corresponding to a single general practitioner (GP) referring an individual for diagnosis once every 15 years on average. Assuming 1% of current patients under the age of 15 years with diabetes were to move onto insulin pump therapy, this would impose an additional cost of pound400-1300 per year for each PCT. The average cost was 15% lower for PCTs in West Yorkshire than North and East Yorkshire. CONCLUSIONS: The additional resources required to pay for insulin pump therapy for a small proportion of the diabetes population would be minimal given the potential benefits to these patients of improved control and anticipated reduction in long-term morbidity.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamento farmacológico , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Sistemas de Infusão de Insulina/economia , Insulina/administração & dosagem , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Adolescente , Criança , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/economia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiologia , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/economia , Incidência , Insulina/economia , Medicina Estatal/economia
3.
Public Health ; 114(5): 374-9, 2000 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11035459

RESUMO

The aim of the present study is to compare the health status of Armed Forces and civilian infants, accounting for social class. In a prospective cohort study, demographic data were obtained from mothers of liveborn infants from 436 civilian and 162 Armed Forces families. Birth details were taken from hospital maternity and child health systems. A six month follow-up was completed by health visitors. Standard social class classification, based on occupation, was used for civilian families and a new equivalent scheme for military personnel. No significant differences were found between civilian and military infants for birthweight, prematurity and failure to thrive. Military infants had significantly more hospital admissions (P=0.015) and accident and emergency attendances (P=0.002) mainly accounted for by the 'manual' social classes of the Armed Forces. Infant health status of civilian and military babies did not differ overall. Increased uptake of hospital services by military families can be explained by local circumstances.


Assuntos
Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Nível de Saúde , Bem-Estar do Lactente , Militares/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Peso ao Nascer , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Inglaterra , Insuficiência de Crescimento/etiologia , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Idade Materna , Militares/classificação , Mães/educação , Mães/estatística & dados numéricos , Trabalho de Parto Prematuro/etiologia , Ocupações/classificação , Ocupações/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Eur J Cancer ; 35(13): 1816-23, 1999 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10673997

RESUMO

The effect of ethnicity and socio-economic status on the survival of a population-based cohort of 1979 children diagnosed with cancer between 1974 and 1995 was investigated. Ethnicity was assigned by computer algorithms and visual inspection as south Asian (or not) for each child, based on their full name. Socio-economic status was measured using the Carstairs index, based on census areas of case residence at diagnosis. 15 children (0.8%) were lost to follow-up. Log-rank tests showed survival from all cancers did not differ between south Asians and other children and no increased risk was observed for south Asians in any diagnostic category, although numbers were small. Increasing levels of deprivation were associated with significant trends of poorer survival from all cancers, leukaemias and brain tumours. Risk of death was typically higher for children from the most deprived areas although differences were not statistically significant after accounting for other factors including ethnicity. Taking all children with malignant disease together, neither ethnicity nor socio-economic status appear to influence survival after taking other factors into consideration.


Assuntos
Neoplasias/mortalidade , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/etnologia , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Sobreviventes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA