Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Rheumatol Int ; 39(12): 2119-2127, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31535169

RESUMO

The objective of our study was to standardize magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of spine and sacroiliac joints in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and/or inflammatory spinal pain, by creating checklists and templates based on the opinions of rheumatologists and radiologists. A scientific committee developed a series of questionnaires with multiple items regarding MRI in patients with axial inflammatory pain and/or axSpA. Then an expert panel of rheumatologists and radiologists rated all items in a 9-point Likert scale. Finally, the scientific committee and the expert panel met to create the definitive documents. Several definitive checklists and templates were generated for rheumatologist-requested MRI and for radiologist-requested MRI reports of sacroiliac joint and spinal examinations. A technical requirement protocol was also agreed on. Our results could be useful in increasing understanding between rheumatologists and radiologists regarding MRI in axSpA diagnosis and follow-up.


Assuntos
Lista de Checagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Articulação Sacroilíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Espondilartrite/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Sacroileíte/diagnóstico por imagem , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Reumatol Clin ; 7(5): 284-98, 2011.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21925444

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Due to the increasing use of biologic therapy in rheumatic diseases and the importance of its risk management, the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER) has promoted the development of recommendations based on the best evidence available. These recommendations should be a reference to rheumatologists and those involved in the treatment of patients who are using, or about to use biologic therapy irrespectively of the rheumatic disease. METHODS: Recommendations were developed following a nominal group methodology and based on systematic reviews. The level of evidence and degree of recommendation were classified according to the model proposed by the Center for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford. The level of agreement was established through a Delphi technique. Evidence from previous consensus and clinical guidelines was used. RESULTS: We have produced recommendations on risk management of biologic therapy in rheumatic patients. These recommendations include indication risk management, risk management before the use of biologic therapy, risk management during follow-up, attitude to adverse events, and attitude to special situations. CONCLUSIONS: We present the SER recommendations related to biologic therapy risk management.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Terapia Biológica , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Doenças Reumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Anti-Inflamatórios/efeitos adversos , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Farmacovigilância , Gestão de Riscos
3.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 70(5): 827-30, 2011 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21242234

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of a healthcare programme in early spondyloarthritis (SpA). METHODS: Based on previous analyses and expectations of a nominal group, the following were set: (1) minimum standards to create early SpA units; (2) standard operating procedures; and (3) eight performance indicators that can be measured in real time using a web-based platform. RESULTS: At the end of the evaluation of the programme the expected level of performance was achieved in three of the indicators: 'referral reliability' (standard (S) >50%, real value (RV) 92%), 'accessibility' (S >90%, RV=91%) and 'duration of first visit' (S >50%, RV=53%). The performance in the remaining indicators was inferior: 'success of referral criteria' (S >50%, RV=28%), 'clinical reports issued' (S >90%, RV=25%), 'feedback guarantee' (S >85%, RV=2%), 'missing data' (S <10%, RV=24%) and 'frequency of review' (S >90%, RV=84%). Explanations for the low performance are provided. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to implement a large-scale programme that is measurable.


Assuntos
Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Modelos Organizacionais , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Espondilartrite/terapia , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Diagnóstico Precoce , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Encaminhamento e Consulta/normas , Espanha , Espondilartrite/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA